Re:
Are you new to following sports?
If you are, I’ll give you a heads up. Leave aside for a moment that only the most determinedly naive can really hope to banish the entire history of the sport and the cynicism it naturally produces from fans attitudes. In any sport, if there is a dominant team that is, as you suggest, using a huge budget to continuously win major events, that team will be despised by fans of other teams and deeply resented by neutrals. Do you think that other English football fans were keen on Man Utd during the period of their dominance? Not only did their rivals hate them, just about every fan of teams that weren’t even in the same division as them wanted them to lose every game. Do you think other Scottish fans were anything but overjoyed when Glasgow Rangers went under?
Adding to that general phenomenon in Sky’s case is that part of the secret of their success is the use of their megabudget to pay superdoms to impose order and control on races. No cycling fans, barring a few masochists, wants to see orderly, controlled racing. Therefore from the point of view of the neutral who is mostly interested in entertainment, Sky are a thousand times more aggravating than the similarly dominant Quickstep.
Oude Geuze said:Damn it’s hard to tell the clinic from the regular forum these days. Nothing but snark and innuendo all through the stage.
We need more casual fans here who still loves racing, drama and brave efforts without the constant cynicism and outcry. The selective sky hate is getting so old. They have twice the budget of other teams, why tf are people surprised that their doms can hang with team leaders?
Every team knows Egan Bernal is maybe the biggest talent of the last 10 years, Sky signed him, that’s what happens when a team has a lot of money. Learn to accept, it’s been 9 years. They will continue to sign stars, have money to develop and support them and afford to spend top riders just to carry their bottles through France. They will continue to win races. Can we just not moan about it every day?
Are you new to following sports?
If you are, I’ll give you a heads up. Leave aside for a moment that only the most determinedly naive can really hope to banish the entire history of the sport and the cynicism it naturally produces from fans attitudes. In any sport, if there is a dominant team that is, as you suggest, using a huge budget to continuously win major events, that team will be despised by fans of other teams and deeply resented by neutrals. Do you think that other English football fans were keen on Man Utd during the period of their dominance? Not only did their rivals hate them, just about every fan of teams that weren’t even in the same division as them wanted them to lose every game. Do you think other Scottish fans were anything but overjoyed when Glasgow Rangers went under?
Adding to that general phenomenon in Sky’s case is that part of the secret of their success is the use of their megabudget to pay superdoms to impose order and control on races. No cycling fans, barring a few masochists, wants to see orderly, controlled racing. Therefore from the point of view of the neutral who is mostly interested in entertainment, Sky are a thousand times more aggravating than the similarly dominant Quickstep.