flicker said:
I just do not like his attitutude. If he had issue with doping he should have attacked doping while he was on top of his game, when he was king. Digger please tell me Greg didn't know about doping while Greg was racing. Greg was a participant in Omerta.
At this point his attacks seem more out of jelousy, spite and a need to be in the limelite.
Gregs time is over, Greg have a seat.
At the time of his retirement, he claimed he was getting his a$$ dropped because of some disease. Yet, he subsequently retracted that and now he says his power numbers were the same or better than previous years.
WTF? The old "I was sick and had no power" got changed to "I was stronger than ever" over the course of time.
I also, like you, scratch my head that he was clueless of what was going on around him. Apparently he only considers doping to be cheating only if the dope is good enough to enable others to beat him.
If Charly Mottet is relegated to also ran behind dopers Fignon and Delgado, then no big deal.
Something else....
GL claims to have stopped winning because of the "two speeds" of the peloton, which is claimed to be the result of oxygen increasing products like EPO superceding the useless steroids and cortisone.
Those types of products, along with other methods like infusions and now HGH, are still prevalent so there should still be two speeds.
Yet, people like Evans and Gilbert have this purity halo in here that they are clean. Taking that into consideration, one can only conclude that Evans and Gilbert are better cyclists than GL ever was because they can excel against the same type of doped competition that he failed at beating.
I'm not sure anybody in here would ever claim that, so hopefully somebody can clear up this bit of confusion brought on by simple deductive reasoning.
I hope this can be cleared up before Digger admonishes us for discussing these outlandish observations.