I think not being in a position to win makes you a pretty big loser!
My apologies to guys like Tim Declercq!
No, you're a loser if you're trying to win, but fudge it up, like Tim Declercq would do (allegedly).
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I think not being in a position to win makes you a pretty big loser!
My apologies to guys like Tim Declercq!
Declercq is set free next year. He's gonna win 10 races.No, you're a loser if you're trying to win, but fudge it up, like Tim Declercq would do (allegedly).
No, you're a loser if you're trying to win, but fudge it up, like Tim Declercq would do (allegedly).
His endurance in a Monument is still a bit of a question mark for me.Is Bagioli riding Lombardia?
That's Landa!Yes, but you need to be second in order to be the rider with most top-10s without a win and not even win the most top-10s without a win competition.
Did that make sense?
Declercq is set free next year. He's gonna win 10 races.
What about riders who try to win, but still never managed to get into the front group near the end?
Speak for yourself!
I meant thar I'm among those riders; not that you were, which wouldn't be possible anyway, since you don't ride any races.
After several years of debates about this, yesYes, but you need to be second in order to be the rider with most top-10s without a win and not even win the most top-10s without a win competition.
Did that make sense?
Martin was DQed for an illegal position
I think it's the hardest climb ever seen in a pro race (it 100% is the hardest climb ever seen in a European* race) - it has a APM coefficient of 703 going by the PCS profile, well above anything in this extensive PRC list, and also above anything in the APM database except for the never-raced Passo della Forcella at 758 and Oscheniksee at 712 - Pico Veleta via Hazallanas is back at 616 because it doesn't have the monster ramps that the APM coefficient overvalues). By cyclingcols coefficient, it lands at 2099, which is higher than literally anything in their database (Pico Veleta via Hazallanas leads at 2088, just ahead of Oscheniksee at 2067 and Forcella at 2044), let alone anything actually raced (Edelweissspitze is 1614, just ahead of Finestre at 1588).Just looked at the Tour of Turkey and there’s a 18km climb at 10.8%! Keep this away from Vegni so we can’t have an ITT here.
This is pretty f…. insane!Just looked at the Tour of Turkey and there’s a 18km climb at 10.8%! Keep this away from Vegni so we can’t have an ITT here.
Froome with a decent 80th place, only losing 4 minutes.Óscar Sevilla, Óscar Sevilla, Óscar Sevilla comes 2nd in a .Pro stage. Is this the real life?!
Froome with a decent 80th place, only losing 4 minutes.