- May 20, 2010
- 718
- 1
- 0
18-Valve. (pithy) said:Seriously? That article doesn't suggest that to be the case. All it really says is:
Initial examinations on his shoulder showed “a hematoma in both my neck and the articulation that I dislocated. These are putting pressure on the nerve system and are the cause of the pain. Besides this, I still have the inflammation in the left leg, from overcompensating the painful shoulder with a cramped position on the bike.”
-
This all seems quite normal to me. Further medical tests don't suggest it, either. What comments attributed to Bruyneel? At no point did he imply that the injury was worse than it first appeared.
I drew the inference based on:
. JB reported to have indicated that he had a shoulder problem and implied this would have minimal impact on his ability to ride.
. Frank noted symptoms/restrictions were not limited to shoulder and reported problems associated with modified posture/pedalling action. So problems as experienced/reported by Frank were more extensive than just a shoulder injury.
I intended to suggest more extensive and therefore the term "serious" was strictly imprecise. Additional tests suggests to me (perhaps me alone) that more extensive is a valid inference.
But maybe it is just a case of clarifying diagnosis/treatment and his injury is only a simple shoulder as initially reported. I prefer to allow that Frank was in significantly more difficulty that initial reports suggested. To wit he was disabled to a greater extent than JB (initially?) appreciated.
Aside...but relevant analogies:
Casey Stoner was bagged several years ago for "wimping out" in the Moto GP. Several commentators indicated the thought Casey was effectively weak in the head. Subsequent testing was reported (edit) to reveal a viral infection.
More recently Thor's capacity/application (my inference...again) has been questioned. I understand that he now suspects a long term viral infection.
Overall my central thought is give people the benefit of the doubt...