• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Logisitcs

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
Had to laugh at that. He sent me a friend invite because he thought it would annoy me or something, but to his surprise I called his bluff and accepted it, knowing the egg would be on his face if he had to be associated with me. And yes, he's had to withdraw it. :D

No, I sent it to you because I knew you would accept, and I would then get to dump you. Dang. Full *** indeed.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
If a group of people are banned then the mistakes are likely. You can see a pattern. There was a dispute about whether The Arbiter was a troll or not, but nobody could seriously argue that you, TFF are trolls based on the evidence. There is pages and pages of it here.

What is you native language?
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
If a group of people are banned then the mistakes are likely. You can see a pattern. There was a dispute about whether The Arbiter was a troll or not, but nobody could seriously argue that you, TFF are trolls based on the evidence. There is pages and pages of it here.

What evidence? Questioning your BS?

You continue to make *** claims, refuse to provide anything to support them, call anyone that questions you a troll, and have been banned before for trolling. Why should you be surprised that others question you?

You must be proud of your success to derail every thread you participate in.
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Yes, it's very hard though - they tend to suck you in. Got to eat now anyway...

Oh, I meant you too! Wow, you eat late in the UK..... :rolleyes:

Seriously folks, this troll bashing may be fun, but some of you are spending a lot of time on this, including some very knowledgeable people capable of posting some very insightful and interesting material. Damn does it get old when you are faced with page after page of it on every thread in The Clinic. For the sake of those of us who are really interested in your opinions, puhleese resist the temptation... except in the rare cases when you have something really funny to add.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
pedaling squares said:
Oh, I meant you too! Wow, you eat late in the UK..... :rolleyes:

Seriously folks, this troll bashing may be fun, but some of you are spending a lot of time on this, including some very knowledgeable people capable of posting some very insightful and interesting material. Damn does it get old when you are faced with page after page of it on every thread in The Clinic. For the sake of those of us who are really interested in your opinions, puhleese resist the temptation... except in the rare cases when you have something really funny to add.

You are right. I will "ignore" him, and I suggest everyone do the same. He isn't here to provide anything new and insightful nor is his new persona WonderLance. Just ignore them both. Surely if I can, you all can do the same. It will make this place much better.
 
Sep 3, 2009
26
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
No, please do ignore me. I've consistently said on every thread if you have nothing to add on the topic then please do not comment. I told Race to ignore me as well, and I have repeatedly said it is spoiling the threads for the others.

Yea jist ignore them they aint got you're brains all they do is try to bring you down to there leval and confus all the grate points you keep bringin up
 
Mar 13, 2009
65
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Pssst, nobody ever said it doesn't or can't happen. Pay attention. :rolleyes:

So what are you still posting in this thread for. If you agree it can and does happen, you agree with the rest of us. Any further posts just highlight that you are trolling. I guess we already knew that though.

Seriously dude, you are TIRESOME. Unfortunately I have now risen to your bait.
I can just imagine the little warm glow this fires in you petty little mind.
 
Mar 13, 2009
65
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
If you have time to read a single post of mine in the thread, you will see that my point has been consistently that blood doping is rarer than is made out. It's not rampant bascially. I think it would be especially hard for the big stars due to the reasons stated. Hope that helps - no need to be stroppy with me.

I know I'm not meant to be doing this (i'm fairly sure you are just a troll) but as you haven't called me any names yet can I ask you a few questions. Your response will prove to me if you are serious or not. Maybe you are just labouring under a false idea (even though it has been spelt out fairly clearly).

How often and how many blood transfusions do you think actually go on at a race like TDF?

And just for your information, I've read every post in this thread, including yours. Unfortunately that's a few hours of my life I'm never getting back.
 
Sep 3, 2009
26
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
If you have time to read a single post of mine in the thread, you will see that my point has been consistently that blood doping is rarer than is made out. It's not rampant bascially. I think it would be especially hard for the big stars due to the reasons stated. Hope that helps - no need to be stroppy with me.

+1 The bloob pastport has singnaled the death of doping Pat McQuaid the head dictater of the UCI has sayd that there is no more doping and there won't be no more posative tests in the tour de france so you are right
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Advancedone said:
So what are you still posting in this thread for. If you agree it can and does happen, you agree with the rest of us. Any further posts just highlight that you are trolling. I guess we already knew that though.

Seriously dude, you are TIRESOME. Unfortunately I have now risen to your bait.
I can just imagine the little warm glow this fires in you petty little mind.

Just go http://forum.cyclingnews.com/profile.php?do=ignorelisthttp://fhereorum.cyclingnews.com/profile.php?do=ignorelist

to put him, and his sockpuppet WonderLance, on ignore.
 
Aug 16, 2009
600
0
0
Visit site
Full *** said:
+1 The bloob pastport has singnaled the death of doping Pat McQuaid the head dictater of the UCI has sayd that there is no more doping and there won't be no more posative tests in the tour de france so you are right

With all the accusations of 'sock puppets' flying around it is a little odd to see this kind of post. If I was a lesser person this poster woud be first on my list of ignored posters.
 
Sep 3, 2009
26
0
0
Visit site
WonderLance said:
With all the accusations of 'sock puppets' flying around it is a little odd to see this kind of post. If I was a lesser person this poster woud be first on my list of ignored posters.

You are a lesser person and you'ld be the first on my ignord list to
 
Mar 13, 2009
65
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
It's very difficult to tell of course. I think these days it's limited to the more crazy riders who are only in the game for the money and desperate, and isn't part of the team structures as it was in the past because of the huge consequenses. How many of these guys there are I don't know, but I think they are the minority.

You still didn't answer the question. I'll make it easier.

How often do you think a GC rider would need to transfuse during a GT.
Do you think it is every day, every second day, once a week or only a couple of times during the event?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Advancedone said:
You still didn't answer the question. I'll make it easier.

How often do you think a GC rider would need to transfuse during a GT.
Do you think it is every day, every second day, once a week or only a couple of times during the event?

Don't feed the troll man, he doesn't want to discuss anything. He/she/it just wants to disrupt threads and get attention. He isn't even a cycling fan. He is just some dude who came along and decided to cause some havoc.
 
Jul 24, 2009
351
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
No its those people that go around lying about my positions, throwing insults about and make other ad hominen attacks. Trolls they certainly are, as you can see from their posts directed at me today - nobody could use the 'they just disagree' line after seeing their latest contributions. They are classic examples of trolls.

What exactly IS you position then, Mr? I'm honestly intrigued how an apparently not-entirely-stupid person can can read so many situations with such obtuse eyes. Is this all rhetorical preactice for you or do you actually believe the niavete that you preach? Let me ask you a specific question: If there was some miraculous test invented (indulge the fantasy) that could retroactively test riders stored samples for the last 10 TDF's with complete accuracy, and you had to put ever dollar you own on either a) - LA has never doped on EPO or blood-doped, or b) - Lance has doped with EPO and blood, which option would you go with? Hypothetically, would you put your money where yor mouth is?? If any of you other Lance nut-huggers would like to interject and answer to this little thought experiment i'd be keen to hear your answers as well.

Regards,

Sarz
 
Jul 24, 2009
351
0
0
Visit site
WonderLance said:
I have been reading for about a month and have been registered for two weeks as you have pointed out. I waited for the post TdF screaming matches died down before registering. I am well aware that this shows up in my profile, but was not aware that the definition of 'a while' was so specific. It clearly is defined by you as more that two weeks, I am sorry for misleading you.

Wonderlance!!!!!!!!! lofl!! Honestly, how could people NOT troll when people sign up with names like "WONDERLANCE" and proceed to post in a sub-froum about DOPING!!!!! Wonderlance!!! WonderFULLLLLL :D
 
Jul 24, 2009
351
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
I am fairly sure he did dope along with everybody else during the 90s on EPO. Why would he not do given there was no test at that point and was part of the set up for all teams?

That's a good quetion.