Logisitcs

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 16, 2009
600
0
0
BanProCycling said:
Originally Posted by BanProCycling "But rather backs up my point that it's a clumsy form of doping that is not as as widespread as made out due to this fact."

ThoughtforFood replies "No, it doesn't".

Game set and match.
Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.

I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now but has not written anything because I do not like the bullying behaviour from some forum members. Thankyou for making such clear, concise points and putting it to the people who want to drag the good name of cyclists, such as Lance, through the mud. Only a few bad apples dope, if more did there would certainly be more positive tests rather than just idle rumour.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
WonderLance said:
Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.

I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now but has not written anything because I do not like the bullying behaviour from some forum members. Thankyou for making such clear, concise points and putting it to the people who want to drag the good name of cyclists, such as Lance, through the mud. Only a few bad apples dope, if more did there would certainly be more positive tests rather than just idle rumour.

Oh dear...guess we will now be dealing with a new screen name. Hey, I did it at the Paceline, so what is good for the goose...
 
Aug 16, 2009
600
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Oh dear...guess we will now be dealing with a new screen name. Hey, I did it at the Paceline, so what is good for the goose...

I can only assume you think that I am BPC. I don’t know what would give you that idea, I just happen to agree with some of the points he is making about doping.

And by the way I don’t make friends with bullies, just like a 12 year old girl.
 
Jun 16, 2009
647
0
0
WonderLance said:
And by the way I don’t make friends with bullies, just like a 12 year old girl.

you certainly seem to admire one of the sports biggest bullies though, who has also recently been twittering like a 12 year old girl.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
auscyclefan94 said:
Mate i'm not talking about a specific year. I'm talking about over the past few years. I did follow cycling back then and understand that doping was a majority back then for multiple reasons. Their is a stricter system in place now which makes it hard for riders to dope. it's a fact and you would know that if you were following cycling closely! I do understand the more wives and girlfirends who bring in the dope of drugs but it wouldn't be hard to catch em and then would be more cases of cheats which is a GOOD thing.
jees, you need really to stop drinking coolaid.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
WonderLance said:
Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.

I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now but has not written anything because I do not like the bullying behaviour from some forum members. Thankyou for making such clear, concise points and putting it to the people who want to drag the good name of cyclists, such as Lance, through the mud. Only a few bad apples dope, if more did there would certainly be more positive tests rather than just idle rumour.

It appears that with BanPro being outed as Arbiter (Not that it wasn't obvious) he has launched his latest troll effort.
 
Aug 16, 2009
600
0
0
Race Radio said:
It appears that with BanPro being outed as Arbiter (Not that it wasn't obvious) he has launched his latest troll effort.

Please see my statement above regarding my identity.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
WonderLance said:
Please see my statement above regarding my identity.

Why should we believe you? You also wrote

WonderLance said:
I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now

You registered two weeks ago. You probably didn't realize that your registration date is in your profile.

I welcome you to the forum, however if you are just going to troll like your hero BanPro perhaps you might consider going someplace else.
 
Aug 16, 2009
600
0
0
Race Radio said:
You registered two weeks ago. You probably didn't realize that your registration date is in your profile.

I have been reading for about a month and have been registered for two weeks as you have pointed out. I waited for the post TdF screaming matches died down before registering. I am well aware that this shows up in my profile, but was not aware that the definition of 'a while' was so specific. It clearly is defined by you as more that two weeks, I am sorry for misleading you.
 
Mar 13, 2009
65
0
0
East Sycamore said:
Thank you for some actual information amongst all the back and forth crap that has hijacked this thread. Also, just because it is difficult to blood dope doesn't mean it doesn't happen. It may mean that only the top teams or riders do it, but that is still a large portion of the peloton at a race like the Tour de France.

It would appear that the OP has had his question answered to his satisfaction, and is happy to agree that it does happen, it may not be easy but neither is cycling around France in 3 weeks.

In some teams it would only be the leader who may be blood doping. 2 refills on rest days is very easy to achieve. Some teams it is obviously more widespread and organised but these teams have bigger budgets to be able to work an answer to any logistical problem. Not to hard to get your head around.

So BPC, it would seem that your "courageous poster" has the intellect to arrive at a reasoned answer. The question remains, why cant YOU??

I'm really starting to believe that you cant be that stupid. You must be getting some form of satisfaction from your efforts, I just hate to think what that may be!!
 
Mar 16, 2009
19,482
2
0
Advancedone said:
You must be getting some form of satisfaction from your efforts, I just hate to think what that may be!!

3884833822_456193874d.jpg
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
krebs303 said:

But that can't be BanPro/Arbiter can it? He says he is from the Uk and that is clearly from some hillbilly festive......was BPC lying again?

I need to got drink some bourbon and forget about that image
 
Mar 16, 2009
19,482
2
0
Race Radio said:
But that can't be BanPro/Arbiter can it? He says he is from the Uk and that is clearly from some hillbilly festive......was BPC lying again?

I need to got drink some bourbon and forget about that image

Sometimes mommy must spank!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
krebs303 said:
Sometimes mommy must spank!

Yikes... That is someone's mommy. The tattoo is particularly nice...:eek:

(banjo playing in the background)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
WonderLance said:
I can only assume you think that I am BPC. I don’t know what would give you that idea, I just happen to agree with some of the points he is making about doping.

And by the way I don’t make friends with bullies, just like a 12 year old girl.

Thanks for accepting my friend request dude!
 
BanProCycling said:
Thanks very much. Good to have you here.

There are a lot of trolls in this forum as you can see from this thread, but there are some decent people as well - they're not as visible because they have to moderate their language so the trolls don't target them, but they are around.

BPC definition of troll: "Anyone who disagrees with the malarky that I am spewing and attempts to call me on it"
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sorry BPC, I had to break our new found friendship. You won't listen to my wise advice so I will just have to dump you. Sucker.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
BanProCycling said:
They are classic examples of trolls.

A classic example of a troll would be a poster who is banned for trolling then signs up a week later with a new username and continues to troll....right Arbiter?

Shouldn't you be down at the pub now instead of trolling here?
 
BanProCycling said:
No its those people that go around lying about my positions, throwing insults about and make other ad hominen attacks. Trolls they certainly are, as you can see from their posts directed at me today - nobody could use the 'they just disagree' line after seeing their latest contributions. They are classic examples of trolls.

Or classic examples of being frustrated by one troll.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
BanProCycling said:
Unlike them, there is no example of me trolling.

You must have forgotten this gem

BanProCycling said:
Psychology is important. We know that young people's frontal lobes - the part of the brain that deals with decision making - doesn't fully mature until the early to mid 20s. That's why you're more likely to crash a car or take drugs, etc, when you're young. For an individual like Armstrong, who was quite immature and hot headed as a younger rider, this process would have been even more important. Put that together with the cancer experience and its quite reasonable to expect an effect on consistency in his performances.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
BanProCycling said:
It's down to the whim of a moderator who is banned. TFF has multple accounts and can't say more than a few words without insulting someone, yet he is not banned. You yourself used to have an account where you pretended to be a woman, yet you are not banned. Does that mean you are not trolls? Of course not. Who is banned has nothing to do with anything.

Anyway lets not disrupt this thread any further with this nonsense, eh?

Didn't you just accuse a group of posters of being trolls because they were banned at RBR? Now you are saying that "Who is banned has nothing to do with anything. " because you where banned using Arbiter.

It is duplicity like this that causes people to call you a troll