Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.BanProCycling said:Originally Posted by BanProCycling "But rather backs up my point that it's a clumsy form of doping that is not as as widespread as made out due to this fact."
ThoughtforFood replies "No, it doesn't".
Game set and match.
WonderLance said:Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.
I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now but has not written anything because I do not like the bullying behaviour from some forum members. Thankyou for making such clear, concise points and putting it to the people who want to drag the good name of cyclists, such as Lance, through the mud. Only a few bad apples dope, if more did there would certainly be more positive tests rather than just idle rumour.
Thoughtforfood said:Oh dear...guess we will now be dealing with a new screen name. Hey, I did it at the Paceline, so what is good for the goose...
WonderLance said:And by the way I don’t make friends with bullies, just like a 12 year old girl.
jees, you need really to stop drinking coolaid.auscyclefan94 said:Mate i'm not talking about a specific year. I'm talking about over the past few years. I did follow cycling back then and understand that doping was a majority back then for multiple reasons. Their is a stricter system in place now which makes it hard for riders to dope. it's a fact and you would know that if you were following cycling closely! I do understand the more wives and girlfirends who bring in the dope of drugs but it wouldn't be hard to catch em and then would be more cases of cheats which is a GOOD thing.
WonderLance said:Thankyou BPC for sticking up for the cyclists, they are not crazy and would not dope unless they were absolutely desperate.
I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now but has not written anything because I do not like the bullying behaviour from some forum members. Thankyou for making such clear, concise points and putting it to the people who want to drag the good name of cyclists, such as Lance, through the mud. Only a few bad apples dope, if more did there would certainly be more positive tests rather than just idle rumour.
Race Radio said:It appears that with BanPro being outed as Arbiter (Not that it wasn't obvious) he has launched his latest troll effort.
WonderLance said:Please see my statement above regarding my identity.
WonderLance said:I am a person who has been registered on the forum for a while now
Race Radio said:You registered two weeks ago. You probably didn't realize that your registration date is in your profile.
East Sycamore said:Thank you for some actual information amongst all the back and forth crap that has hijacked this thread. Also, just because it is difficult to blood dope doesn't mean it doesn't happen. It may mean that only the top teams or riders do it, but that is still a large portion of the peloton at a race like the Tour de France.
Advancedone said:You must be getting some form of satisfaction from your efforts, I just hate to think what that may be!!
krebs303 said:
Race Radio said:But that can't be BanPro/Arbiter can it? He says he is from the Uk and that is clearly from some hillbilly festive......was BPC lying again?
I need to got drink some bourbon and forget about that image
krebs303 said:Sometimes mommy must spank!
WonderLance said:I can only assume you think that I am BPC. I don’t know what would give you that idea, I just happen to agree with some of the points he is making about doping.
And by the way I don’t make friends with bullies, just like a 12 year old girl.
BanProCycling said:Thanks very much. Good to have you here.
There are a lot of trolls in this forum as you can see from this thread, but there are some decent people as well - they're not as visible because they have to moderate their language so the trolls don't target them, but they are around.
BanProCycling said:They are classic examples of trolls.
BanProCycling said:No its those people that go around lying about my positions, throwing insults about and make other ad hominen attacks. Trolls they certainly are, as you can see from their posts directed at me today - nobody could use the 'they just disagree' line after seeing their latest contributions. They are classic examples of trolls.
BanProCycling said:Unlike them, there is no example of me trolling.
BanProCycling said:Psychology is important. We know that young people's frontal lobes - the part of the brain that deals with decision making - doesn't fully mature until the early to mid 20s. That's why you're more likely to crash a car or take drugs, etc, when you're young. For an individual like Armstrong, who was quite immature and hot headed as a younger rider, this process would have been even more important. Put that together with the cancer experience and its quite reasonable to expect an effect on consistency in his performances.
BanProCycling said:It's down to the whim of a moderator who is banned. TFF has multple accounts and can't say more than a few words without insulting someone, yet he is not banned. You yourself used to have an account where you pretended to be a woman, yet you are not banned. Does that mean you are not trolls? Of course not. Who is banned has nothing to do with anything.
Anyway lets not disrupt this thread any further with this nonsense, eh?
BanProCycling said:Anyway lets not disrupt this thread any further with this nonsense, eh?