I will not entertain any thoughts of Cav retiring after what came out of Lefeveres egotistical mouth.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
which bit?I will not entertain any thoughts of Cav retiring after what came out of Lefeveres egotistical mouth.
I think there's both a bit of a disdain for sprinters and a deification of Merckx in particular. Some other sports do it with the earlier legends too. But let's be real. A bunch of Merckx wins were half stages, and he rode in days when a bunch of riders were semi-pros at best.
There seems to be this underlying idea Cav wouldn't be worthy of the stage record for some reason, or that he's unworthy of being a legend of the sport in his own right.
With Greipel retiring, what are the chances of him heading to ISN?
Although personally as a big Cav fan there is a part of me that would like this Tour to be the end of his TdF career; 4 time stage winner and green jersey winner, even with another fortunate set of circumstances it's almost impossible that he'll repeat that next year and pretty unlikely he'll grab one stage win, never mind multiple. Wouldn't it be better if this was his last Tour de France, rather than a potential dud?
Is there anything wrong with flat stages and sprints?Let's be real. Cavendish got at least one win after missing the time cut. All of his wins were in bunch sprints. Most of them in pan-flat stages. The vast majority of the stages he won were thanks to relying on a wonderful train (HTC back in the days, Deceuninck this year). If we were to point out the flaws in the wins leading up to the record, Cavendish surely won't look better than Eddy.
I will save this for when you comment on the next TDF route reveal.Is there anything wrong with flat stages and sprints?
In race design, obviously. But I think it's a bit ridiculous to blame a sprinter for winning sprints and taking a record that way. The record is specifically about Tour stage wins, with no style points attached, and nobody uses that record to prop up Cavendish as a champion like Merckx anyway.I will save this for when you comment on the next TDF route reveal.
Cavendish is already hurt in his palmares by being a sprinter in that he can't win stage races of any prestige and that he can't win most classics of any prestige.
Sagan, Boonen and Freire all way better sprinters than Cav smhI can see the discussion about the definition of sprinter coming a mile away...
Chris Hoy would win Ronde if he bothered to try...Sagan, Boonen and Freire all way better sprinters than Cav smh
Only needs to dropChris Hoy would win Ronde if he bothered to try...
Maybe more these days (sorry Chris…).Only needs to drop51023 kgs, and he'll be set.
Wow, no love for the God of Thunder smhSagan, Boonen and Freire all way better sprinters than Cav smh
Not 4 times he would have. Merlier is clearly quicker than Philipsen, but as shown in both the Giro and the Tour he can't get over mountains so he'll always have trouble making the time cut 3 weeks straight.CaV wOuLdN't HaVe EvEn BeAtEn MeRlIeR iF hE dIdN't HaVe To PlAy LeAdOuT tO pHiLiPsEn.
Mark Cavendish delays contract talks to ride and 'win' Roeselare Criterium
'I'm going to make some time for my family now' says Tour de France green jersey winnerwww.cyclingnews.com