Patrick had a totally bonus day with a win. I think the issue with Cav will fade into the media past tense. Unfortunate for Mark and maybe us, but it's history.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Be kicking himself even more if he wins next year. Hopefully he goes to the Vuelta but they’re probably all in for Remco.I bet Patti is kicking himself today because this sprint had Cav written all over it: could have been yet another win and record breaking at that!
Considering they won the first 2 stages I highly doubt he’d be kicking himself.I bet Patti is kicking himself today because this sprint had Cav written all over it: could have been yet another win and record breaking at that!
3>2Considering they won the first 2 stages I highly doubt he’d be kicking himself.
Nowhere near as successful a Tour for QS this year compared to when they took Cav. More to winning in Tours than looking fast in the spring it seems.
Well 4. 2, 3, 4, and 15.It also helps when there are 7 sprint opportunities on the first 18 stages instead of 2.
Well 4. 2, 3, 4, and 15.
I’m not so sure 15 would be too hard for Cav, it would depend on what has happened in the previous stages, and 4 probably, but still Jakobsen finished in the first chase group behind WVA.Those (4 and 15) were too hard for Jakobsen/Cavendish.
I think Cav could have contested it though who knows if that translates to a win. He was 4/4 before This point last year. Jakobsen has been 1/3. Now if he could have got through the mountains with the Giro in his legs is another question. All I know is Jakobsen winning was huge for him, but the team would have had a massive positive press if Cav was replaced. Whether that is fair or not isn’t up to us. Just like if Froome won on Alpe would have been a far bigger story then what Israel received with their two wins combined.Those (4 and 15) were too hard for Jakobsen/Cavendish.
Cav would have had a better chance than FJ on 4 and 15.Those (4 and 15) were too hard for Jakobsen/Cavendish.
Cav would have had a better chance than FJ on 4 and 15.
Isn’t he 50/50 on the first sprint in the Tour?Maybe. But he wouldn't have won today either, and he might not have won stage 2 (I think he often missed the first opportunity in the Tour). If so, then it would all depend on stage 21 (after making it over all the mountains).
I think this year could have been a very frustrating race for Cavendish.
Nowhere near as successful a Tour for QS this year compared to when they took Cav. More to winning in Tours than looking fast in the spring it seems.
oh boy….Thought i was losing my memory with people claiming Cav would have contested stage 4, Van Aert won by 8 seconds from a solo attack so the idea of Cav contesting the win...well only a fanboy would come up with such an idiotic suggestion. Lets give some context here, last year there was 5 bunch sprints by stage 13 with Cav winning 4, this year there was 2 by the same point in the race. There wasn't a single cat 3 climb on any of those stages, but Cav would have got over two Cat 3s on stage 15 this year, including one in the last 50km to win the stage...without Morkov....... according to the fanboys.
Maybe Cav fans should appreciate how many things went his way last year. I mean just look at the difference in Van Aert week 1 this Tour versus week one last year. No comparison. This Tour reminds me of when I first started watching cycling, far less sprint stages than modern Tours. Hard to rack up the wins when you only get3/4 chances each year.
Shocking huh? Fans of Cav posting in the Cav thread.Thought i was losing my memory with people claiming Cav would have contested stage 4, Van Aert won by 8 seconds from a solo attack so the idea of Cav contesting the win...well only a fanboy would come up with such an idiotic suggestion. Lets give some context here, last year there was 5 bunch sprints by stage 13 with Cav winning 4, this year there was 2 by the same point in the race. There wasn't a single cat 3 climb on any of those stages, but Cav would have got over two Cat 3s on stage 15 this year, including one in the last 50km to win the stage...without Morkov....... according to the fanboys.
Maybe Cav fans should appreciate how many things went his way last year. I mean just look at the difference in Van Aert week 1 this Tour versus week one last year. No comparison. This Tour reminds me of when I first started watching cycling, far less sprint stages than modern Tours. Hard to rack up the wins when you only get3/4 chances each year.
Shocking huh? Fans of Cav posting in the Cav thread.
I enjoyed the lecture with my morning coffee though. Idiotic indeed.