Teams & Riders Mark Cavendish Discussion Thread

Page 85 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Damn, that's a shame. Now there is almost no competition for Kittel at the Tour. Flat stages where boring enough as it is but now it's obvious, who takes those stages. Last year was the first in a long while that he actually challenged Kittel and even won more stages than him and now this.
 
Re:

tobydawq said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mark-cavendish-diagnosed-with-epstein-barr-virus/

Sad for him. This could probably mean no Tour given how long this disease usually lasts. Let's hope it doesn't hit him as harshly as it did Beñat Intxausti.

It's not uncommon in endurance athletes. Michael Rodgers also had a few seasons badly effected by it.
 
Bummer....I really was looking forward to him winning in the Tour. He made last years sprints so interesting. I was enjoying the weaker leadout trains - little bit more chaotic than the last few years...in a good way. I guess it will be harder for him to reach Merckx's record.
 
NOOOOOOOOO!
I hope he recovers in time for Le Tour especially since him and Armstrong is what got me into cycling in 2009. Hopefully this doesn't beat his chances to pass Merckx.

If he can't ride it I hope he goes to Vuelta and adds to his tally there and get closer to 10 wins and hopefully win the points classification.
 
Apr 21, 2017
140
0
0
Re: Re:

movingtarget said:
tobydawq said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mark-cavendish-diagnosed-with-epstein-barr-virus/

Sad for him. This could probably mean no Tour given how long this disease usually lasts. Let's hope it doesn't hit him as harshly as it did Beñat Intxausti.

It's not uncommon in endurance athletes. Michael Rodgers also had a few seasons badly effected by it.

Yep..and there is no telling how long it will be before he is recovered as people react differently. For some it is mild, but the fatigue can persist, for others it can put them in bed for a fortnight and the effects can hamper them for over a year.

My gut feeling is that he won't be competitive come July, which is a shame as he has developed into a skilled stage poacher, rather than a straight up sheer speed merchant at the end of a train.

There will still be plenty of fun in the sprints without him, but I hope he can add to it.
 
I wonder if his added travel to support the team bike project, Qhubeka, contributed to his fatigue and hammered immune system? Huge 2016+extra travel=E-BV? I'm always amazed that these guys aren't sick more often than they are (or maybe we don't hear about most of it) since they are racing, training, and traveling all over the globe.
 
Good to see him back racing, hopefully he can win another Tour stage but its hard to see him getting into the same form as last July after his health problems. I suppose there is no guarantee he will even make the Tour if he suffers during his return.
 
I hope he gets well enough to do the Tour. Without him the sprint stages would be boring for me and I would be stock just rooting for Contador to win and Valverde to do well.

I wish he would give the Vuelta a try more then just 10 and 11. I think that would be a big achievement being the 1st and possibly only person with at least 10 wins in each GT.
 
Re:

yaco said:
Think Cavendish should ease into riding and aim for the Vuelta, though this will make the second tier sprinter's unhappy.

No way, there's way too many sprint opportunities this year to completely give the Tour a miss. Take the start line, see how he goes, and then maybe pull out before the mountains before giving the Vuelta a go
 
There's only about 2 stages in the Vuelta that Cav has a decent chance of winning, and one more where he has an outside chance. Would be crazy to target that. Even if he's got no form at all he could ride himself into shape at the start of the Tour and have at least three good chances in the last week. It's not like there is huge competition for places at DD either.
 
Re:

DFA123 said:
There's only about 2 stages in the Vuelta that Cav has a decent chance of winning, and one more where he has an outside chance. Would be crazy to target that. Even if he's got no form at all he could ride himself into shape at the start of the Tour and have at least three good chances in the last week. It's not like there is huge competition for places at DD either.

The only thing is bringing Cav means bringing a bunch of leadout men who have no chance of winning any stages. But yeah, this is DD we're talking about, not Etixx, and an off-form Cav probs still has far higher chances of winning a stage than 5 other DD riders combined
 
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
There's only about 2 stages in the Vuelta that Cav has a decent chance of winning, and one more where he has an outside chance. Would be crazy to target that. Even if he's got no form at all he could ride himself into shape at the start of the Tour and have at least three good chances in the last week. It's not like there is huge competition for places at DD either.

The only thing is bringing Cav means bringing a bunch of leadout men who have no chance of winning any stages. But yeah, this is DD we're talking about, not Etixx, and an off-form Cav probs still has far higher chances of winning a stage than 5 other DD riders combined
Definitely. He basically saved their season last year, so they can repay him a bit.. Well, him and the UCI changing the WT 'relegation' system. If they think he's a big risk, then they could even just give him one leadout man and tell him to fight for himself. Still would have a way better chance of a stage win in that situation than anyone else they could potentially replace him with.
 
Re:

DFA123 said:
There's only about 2 stages in the Vuelta that Cav has a decent chance of winning, and one more where he has an outside chance. Would be crazy to target that. Even if he's got no form at all he could ride himself into shape at the start of the Tour and have at least three good chances in the last week. It's not like there is huge competition for places at DD either.

No point in going to the TDF unless you are close to 100% - Go to the Vuelta and that gives you a base for 2018 - Yo gotta think long-term and not only short-term.
 
Re: Re:

yaco said:
DFA123 said:
There's only about 2 stages in the Vuelta that Cav has a decent chance of winning, and one more where he has an outside chance. Would be crazy to target that. Even if he's got no form at all he could ride himself into shape at the start of the Tour and have at least three good chances in the last week. It's not like there is huge competition for places at DD either.

No point in going to the TDF unless you are close to 100% - Go to the Vuelta and that gives you a base for 2018 - Yo gotta think long-term and not only short-term.

Assuming he's in anything close to good shape, he should 100% go to the Tour. A stage in the Tour is easily worth 5 in the Vuelta. No-one cares about Vuelta sprint stages and for good reason - there basically are no sprint stages and (therefore) basically no sprinters!
The Vuelta means nothing to Cav - he's already won stages there and the points jersey. With him so close to Merckx and every stage win getting closer to the last in his career, unless he really isn't feeling it he must go to the Tour.
 
I agree. Most people in this forum would assumingly consider it a travesty for Cavendish to beat the Merckx record, but it would be a big deal. So if he thinks he has any chance at all to win a stage, he must go to the Tour.
 

TRENDING THREADS