Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 154 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 6, 2009
4,607
505
17,080
Re: Re:

blutto said:
pmcg76 said:
aphronesis said:
No I don't. And I said that sniper's posts may lack in terms trad history format. Or bleed too much context. But others get overly excited by that leakage and sloppy causality. None of us can say how a "thing" went, but I'm entertained by the resistance to sniper's posts and the vehemence to his (sometimes) overconnection of the dots. As perceived.

This post basically reads as "Yes, we know sniper is a troll, but he is our troll so we are fine with that and as an Armstrong apologist, we particularly enjoy that he trolls the LeMond thread hard"

The transperency is clear and the fact that Blutto and SF have been in line to agree confirms it.

As I have posted before, not all trolls are equal in the cyclingnews forum.

Also I would like to know what other posters have returned from perma-bans. I don't be here all the time so maybe I missed a few, but I cannot think of any. Was Chewie perman-banned at one time?

....let's get one thing perfectly clear you cannot call neither Aphro nor SF or myself Armstrong apologists just because we are not as thrilled with LeMond as you are....maybe that defines your bipolar world but I don't subscribe to such simplistic reductionism ( and judging from things they have said before I assume the others don't either )....

Cheers

<edited> You dont subscribe to simplistic reduction, but say that I am thrilled with LeMond :lol:

I personally dont really care for LeMond and I have said before if people believe he doped, so be it. My opinions on LeMond are not based on LeMond, but rather other athletes of that time and I have posted this multiple times. However, I do take issue with posters who spend their time trolling hard like sniper does. I have disagreed with sniper across multiple issues, not just the LeMond thread. It is however more blatant in that thread.
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

pmcg76 said:
blutto said:
pmcg76 said:
aphronesis said:
No I don't. And I said that sniper's posts may lack in terms trad history format. Or bleed too much context. But others get overly excited by that leakage and sloppy causality. None of us can say how a "thing" went, but I'm entertained by the resistance to sniper's posts and the vehemence to his (sometimes) overconnection of the dots. As perceived.

This post basically reads as "Yes, we know sniper is a troll, but he is our troll so we are fine with that and as an Armstrong apologist, we particularly enjoy that he trolls the LeMond thread hard"

The transperency is clear and the fact that Blutto and SF have been in line to agree confirms it.

As I have posted before, not all trolls are equal in the cyclingnews forum.

Also I would like to know what other posters have returned from perma-bans. I don't be here all the time so maybe I missed a few, but I cannot think of any. Was Chewie perman-banned at one time?

....let's get one thing perfectly clear you cannot call neither Aphro nor SF or myself Armstrong apologists just because we are not as thrilled with LeMond as you are....maybe that defines your bipolar world but I don't subscribe to such simplistic reductionism ( and judging from things they have said before I assume the others don't either )....

Cheers

Man, you are full of BS. You dont subscribe to simplistic reduction, but say that I am thrilled with LeMond :lol:

I personally dont really care for LeMond and I have said before if people believe he doped, so be it. My opinions on LeMond are not based on LeMond, but rather other athletes of that time and I have posted this multiple times. However, I do take issue with posters who spend their time trolling hard like sniper does. I have disagreed with sniper across multiple issues, not just the LeMond thread. It is however more blatant in that thread.

....if I were you I'd give your monkey a peanut quick, I see he's real hungry....

Cheers
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
Re: Re:

....if I were you I'd give your monkey a peanut quick, I see he's real hungry....

Cheers

I read it somewhat in the same nature as you did fellow "stooge" now "ClubHouse" member. But hey I also got really tired of my very well educated friend from baltimore calling some homophotovalic. So I would caution against the snap judgment to adjust mills and put rounds down range.

The rabbit is still trying to figure out why ole girl got into the hot stuff and almost O.D'd thank goodness for John Travolta and that Giant needle. Otherwise she would have been a dead one after the night of dancing and blow at the Rabbit.

Anyhow I have called up other fellow stooges on the bat line and they will be around directly.

To bad you and Aphro are Lance apologist. I really feel bad about that.

AnyWHO in classic fashion I can't wait for the sniper to get back and erect a POLL for the greatest dopers between 85 and 89.

Cheers stooges.
 
Jan 10, 2010
1,717
1
10,485
Re: Re:

Semper Fidelis said:
....if I were you I'd give your monkey a peanut quick, I see he's real hungry....

Cheers

I read it somewhat in the same nature as you did fellow "stooge" now "ClubHouse" member. But hey I also got really tired of my very well educated friend from baltimore calling some homophotovalic. So I would caution against the snap judgment to adjust mills and put rounds down range.

The rabbit is still trying to figure out why ole girl got into the hot stuff and almost O.D'd thank goodness for John Travolta and that Giant needle. Otherwise she would have been a dead one after the night of dancing and blow at the Rabbit.

Anyhow I have called up other fellow stooges on the bat line and they will be around directly.

To bad you and Aphro are Lance apologist. I really feel bad about that.

AnyWHO in classic fashion I can't wait for the sniper to get back and erect a POLL for the greatest dopers between 85 and 89.

Cheers stooges.

Semper Fidelis had his name changed because his employer decided to do deep background checks that include searching social media and websites.

A very wise move my friend, very wise - :D
 
Jan 10, 2010
1,717
1
10,485
Re:

Semper Fidelis said:
Have a wonderful evening Friend jackrabbits. I wish you and your after hours life much success.

<edited by mods>. I could not understand a word this old man was saying.

Stay Frosty troll craft.

Thank you kind sir - still in the AM here, but I'll carry your well wishes on with me throughout the day and into the evening.


I'll let the "<edited by mods>" reference slide this time around Pal....normally I'd report such a disgusting reference.
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

JackRabbitSlims said:
Semper Fidelis said:
Have a wonderful evening Friend jackrabbits. I wish you and your after hours life much success.

<edited by mods>. I could not understand a word this old man was saying.

Stay Frosty troll craft.

Thank you kind sir - still in the AM here, but I'll carry your well wishes on with me throughout the day and into the evening.


I'll let the "<edited by mods>" reference slide this time around Pal....normally I'd report such a disgusting reference.

.....funny, but not that long ago I had been thinking just the very same thing....and have to add, gee, how very big of you , considering....and I mean that in the good sense.... :D

Cheers
 
Oct 6, 2009
5,270
2
0
The thread disappears and reappears, much like the UCI rulebook.

@Irondan, do you have the power to permaban Brian Cookson?
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
I think most will agree that python is a good member here. I guess he ran aground trying to keep ? Not sure if it was that or another glitch in the matrix.
 
Mar 31, 2015
10,200
4,961
28,180
Re:

Benotti69 said:
Python banned??? Wtf???

If he is calling a poster names they no doubt deserved it. Python A1 poster!!!!
Pretty sure dj didn't care either. He was angry when mods had previously intervened.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,241
29,892
28,180
Re: Re:

Semper Fidelis said:
Brullnux said:
Benotti69 said:
Python banned??? Wtf???

If he is calling a poster names they no doubt deserved it. Python A1 poster!!!!
Pretty sure dj didn't care either. He was angry when mods had previously intervened.
How sure?
This is what google shows when I search for "pretty":
pretty-wild-aw15-06.jpeg
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

Semper Fidelis said:
Brullnux said:
Benotti69 said:
Python banned??? Wtf???

If he is calling a poster names they no doubt deserved it. Python A1 poster!!!!
Pretty sure dj didn't care either. He was angry when mods had previously intervened.
How sure?

...in camera proof would be nice...you know, just to be sure...

Cheers
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

Netserk said:
Semper Fidelis said:
Brullnux said:
Benotti69 said:
Python banned??? Wtf???

If he is calling a poster names they no doubt deserved it. Python A1 poster!!!!
Pretty sure dj didn't care either. He was angry when mods had previously intervened.
How sure?
This is what google shows when I search for "pretty":
pretty-wild-aw15-06.jpeg

....match point!....the good news is.... you win....the bad news?....you owe me a keyboard....

Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.