Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 72 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
MarkvW said:
For anybody who has not seen this pattern before, this is a classic example of RR and his attack dog working a poster in tandem. If the pattern holds, Berzin will be intervening against that poster in 3. . . 2 . . . 1.

Yet another **** post.

Maybe take a look at who the aggressor is.
 
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
Digger said:
ironic.........:rolleyes:

you are clearly handling your own ones extremely well. Kudos.

Yeah dude, there's a big difference between you two. When Chewie thinks he went over the line he'll be a man and apologize.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
I give you that Digger is aggressive, rude, and not unworthy of blame. But the way that the two other posters get him to amplify himself is truly a work of art.
 
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
Scott SoCal said:
Yet another **** post.

Maybe take a look at who the aggressor is.

From what I see...RR puts out some info that is 99% correct...and then the other ones who don't have anything to contribute tend to get all snarly.
...not a great way to get the point across..

If you don't agree..maybe try a different approach..it all ends up so petty and troll-y.
Egos are a fragile concept
 
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
MarkvW said:
I give you that Digger is aggressive, rude, and not unworthy of blame. But the way that the two other posters get him to amplify himself is truly a work of art.


Oh my. Digger isn't responsible for what he types on his keyboard and then hitting the 'go' button.

Amazing how one poster defends himself and then out come the long knives.
 
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
mewmewmew13 said:
From what I see...RR puts out some info that is 99% correct...and then the other ones who don't have anything to contribute tend to get all snarly.
...not a great way to get the point across..

If you don't agree..maybe try a different approach..it all ends up so petty and troll-y.
Egos are a fragile concept


Some people want to see it all burned down and will try and run over whomever doesn't see it the way they do. This is some of that.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
MarkvW said:
I give you that Digger is aggressive, rude, and not unworthy of blame. But the way that the two other posters get him to amplify himself is truly a work of art.

vortex must be spinning around in his grave when reading this thread.. he would have loved it here right now.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Scott SoCal said:
Yeah dude, there's a big difference between you two. When Chewie thinks he went over the line he'll be a man and apologize.

Thanks for this Scott. As the person on this forum who has taken the worst of my outbursts, I truly appreciate this. I absolutely let emotions get the best of me sometimes, and that isn't on anyone but me. That's why I don't feel like engaging with Digger here. I have never seen a rational response from him when he starts to freak-out.

That happened between he and I some time back, and I was man enough to admit my error to him. He never admitted any wrong in the situation, but said everything was cool, so I let it ride. I'm not going back there with him.

I will fight again and again with you because I find value in the content of your posts. RR and I definitely don't see eye-to-eye, but I respect him.

Past that, I certainly won't lose sleep because an intertubes attorney is angry because he posts absurd s**t, and I call him on it, nor some perpetually angry blowhard who would fight with a brick wall about bricks.

Cheers man. I'll be out there in Droughtafornia in 5 weeks...I have to say, I am already a bit intimidated about all of the fees I'm going to need to pay just to live there...:)
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Scott SoCal said:
Oh my. Digger isn't responsible for what he types on his keyboard and then hitting the 'go' button.

Amazing how one poster defends himself and then out come the long knives.


I'd take issue with your "one poster" statement, your "defends himself" statement, and your "long knives" statement.

(1) It is two posters working in tandem.
(2) It goes far beyond "defending himself"
(3) The "long knives" will probably come out, but not as you imply.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
the sceptic said:
vortex must be spinning around in his grave when reading this thread.. he would have loved it here right now.

At some point, and this is an earnest request, I would like to know what it is that started the row between you and I. I cannot remember anything, but that may very well be due to the fact that at some point, I've p***ed everyone here off. But the aggressiveness you show to some of my posts suggests that I must have written something really sh*tty to you. If you're game, I'd like to know what that was. PM me if you care to.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
The only person I've ever lobbied to be banned was BPC, and I will do it again, and again, and again, and again.

Past that, if someone gets banned for replying to one of my posts, that's on them. I've been banned plenty, and I don't flinch when I take my medicine. If others can't admit their complicity in their actions, that has nothing to do with me. Almost every time I've been banned, I deserved it because I was clearly breaking the rules.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
the sceptic said:
hog doesnt always troll, he also provides humor and good content. Im not sure why he bothers to argue with RR, because that is a battle no sane person can win. But the clinic will definitely miss him.

Agreed, he doesn't always troll, but when he does, I just wonder what would happen if people didn't respond every, single time.

I guess we'll never know.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
MarkvW said:
For anybody who has not seen this pattern before, this is a classic example of RR and his attack dog working a poster in tandem. If the pattern holds, Berzin will be intervening against that poster in 3. . . 2 . . . 1.

Nah. You got it all wrong. He won't be lobbying Berzin to ban people. He will be lobbying Berzin to uphold the rules by banning people he does not like. That is like...uh...not lobbying to ban people. :rolleyes:

Still waiting for SB to weigh in and back up the lies about what happened with thehog.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Race Radio said:
Digger thinks the only way to know anything about the case is to call Floyd.....Floyd will not talk. I would never even ask him as I know he can't talk about it.

Or, perhaps, Floyd can or does talk, but it's in private, and that's why Digger can't publicly respond to your request for him to correct your errors in that particular thread.

Just sayin'.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Dear Wiggo said:
Or, perhaps, Floyd can or does talk, but it's in private, and that's why Digger can't publicly respond to your request for him to correct your errors in that particular thread.

Just sayin'.

Um....Digger is not Floyd.

Digger has figured out that taunting people with fake innuendo is better then having any facts
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Race Radio said:
Um....Digger is not Floyd.

:eek: :confused:

Race Radio said:
*deleted by mod*

Or he can't say.

The best bit: it will all shake out in the wash. Looking forward to the case ending.

I do wonder if the thread will die at the same time.

What will people have to rage against then.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Dear Wiggo said:
:eek: :confused:
Or he can't say.

Digger does not know. Floyd would certainly not tell him, or anyone outside his legal team, anything about the case. He claims over and over that I have written something wrong about the Qui Tam case......but refuses to point out what it is. That is because it does not exist.

Pretty simple
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
BroDeal said:
From what I know they are lying. They banned thehog in Feb. because of this. Look to the moderator's thread to see their refusal to give the reason for the his ban. This sort of underhanded dealing has festered ever since.

you mean this?
sittingbison said:
Thehog is banned for a month for deliberately disregarding a direct commitment (s)he made :mad:.

This post explains perfectly what happened. The hog knew what s/he was doing, and knew what would happen. What is underhand about having a discussion via PM? You know, the PRIVATE message feature that Americans for some inexplicable reason fail to comprehend?

However, the hog was not banned for breaking a direct commitment s/he made to me. The hog was banned for breaking a direct commitment made to Daniel via email - going that route is asking for it in any walk of like.

kingjr said:
... please tell me what the motivation for the mods would be to make secret deals with RR.

there are no secret deals - with race radio or anybody else.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
sittingbison said:
This post explains perfectly what happened. The hog knew what s/he was doing, and knew what would happen. What is underhand about having a discussion via PM? You know, the PRIVATE message feature that Americans for some inexplicable reason fail to comprehend?

It does not explain what happened; at the time you guys flatly refused to explain why thehog was banned. It does not explain that management is making deals with posters not to respond to other posters and they will be banned if they do. It does not detail the lobbying RR has done with the mods and management. And it does not acknowledge that RR then spent his time baiting thehog into engaging with him.

The mods have turned into RR's b!tches. He shows up and posts disappear. It is like clockwork it is so predictable. From what I hear he has been colluding with other members to report certain members' posts.

You guys have done your best to ban everyone so this place turns into twitter without the 140 char limit.
 
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
What is going on with the conspiracy theories here lately?

AS if...:confused:

To remind you of the fun we used to have in the old days..just look at the first page of posts on this thread.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
mewmewmew13 said:
To remind you of the fun we used to have in the old days..just look at the first page of posts on this thread.

That was before RR started lobbying to get people banned and reporting every other post.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
BroDeal said:
It does not explain what happened; at the time you guys flatly refused to explain why thehog was banned. It does not explain that management is making deals with posters not to respond to other posters and they will be banned if they do. It does not detail the lobbying RR has done with the mods and management. And it does not acknowledge that RR then spent his time baiting thehog into engaging with him.

The mods have turned into RR's b!tches. He shows up and posts disappear. It is like clockwork it is so predictable. From what I hear he has been colluding with other members to report certain members' posts.

You guys have done your best to ban everyone so this place turns into twitter without the 140 char limit.

Your just spreading and making up conspiracy theories BroDeal. I'd advice you to stop for your own good, but I know it wouldn't do any good.

__________________________________________________________________________

So I'll just say this, for anyone reading through this and the mod thread. The things BroDeal is writing about secret deals, getting others to report posts, and RR lobbying us among other things are not true in any way. It's been said and explained by 3 different mods now, I don't know how it can be explained any more clearer. And that's the last I'll say on the matter.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
Afrank said:
Your just spreading and making up conspiracy theories BroDeal. I'd advice you to stop for your own good, but I know it wouldn't do any good.

What part am I making up? The fact that word is going around that RR has tried to enlist other members to report posts? The part where RR knew that thehog would get banned if he responded to him so he did his best to bait thehog into engaging? The part where RR regularly reports posts he does not like and the mods jump to it like they are in his employ? The part where you have banned or driven off most of the posters who had anything interesting to say? The part where SB has stated he will conceal what agreements were in place?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.