Froome19 said:I depreciate the Hog being banned. His posts are funny.
ElChingon said:Depreciate Mountainman getting banned for mentioning that not so great WWII leader when others can bring him up with not an iota of care from the Mods.
If you say you ban someone for saying or invoking past historical bad guy then everyone else should also be banned for invoking that bad guy's name.
Its called hypocrisy, look it up.
ChrisE said:Hypocrisy? Doubtful, the unwritten clinic rules that are based upon where one aligns in the clinic is well known. It is mountainman's fault for not realizing this...if he wants to continue to play in here he needs to grasp this fact. He can PM me when he gets off ban and I can give him some pointers.
ElChingon said:Depreciate Mountainman getting banned for mentioning that not so great WWII leader when others can bring him up with not an iota of care from the Mods.
If you say you ban someone for saying or invoking past historical bad guy then everyone else should also be banned for invoking that bad guy's name.
Its called hypocrisy, look it up.
red_flanders said:You must have missed the other (and main) reason for the ban.
I missed where you reported the other post you're referring to. You may have but I missed it. We're not responding 24/7, and do miss some reports.
ElChingon said:All's fair in equal, unbiased mod-ing then![]()
Was this something that happened to Fuji, BlackCat, and Chewie?ElChingon said:Depreciating forum-ites getting banned for ignoring mods warning when mods don't get banned for ignoring Dan's warnings.
red_flanders said:Not sure how to make it clear but the race angle in this topic is off topic and off limits. I've had to delete more posts. Next steps will unfortunately be thread closure and/or more bans. Please move on.
moi aussi!D-Queued said:Should we also offer our appreciation to suspended members on this thread?
Sometimes one of us appears to take one for the team. That gets my appreciation.
Dave.
D-Queued said:Should we also offer our appreciation to suspended members on this thread?
ebandit said:why?...............for providing entertainment
hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week
hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?
is that fair?
we don't know the story behind it.ebandit said:why?...............for providing entertainment
hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week
hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?
is that fair?
Joachim was very likely a troll, a banned member returning -- the same thing that you were accused of. in your case, you were able to prove you weren't and returned and continue with the periods lest we forget.ebandit said:but recently hoggie was very much into 'trolling / flaming' mode too
only difference was joachim and hog were locked in opposition during any
debate
thirteen said:J
Hog is the Hog is the Hog. he doesn't need to come back as anyone else.
he is The Hog.
