Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Please report any posts which would fall under "Clinic Baiting" or any other excessive trollbaiting.
 
hogwash

Froome19 said:
I depreciate the Hog being banned. His posts are funny.

i was happy to see hoggie..............banned again ...........no-one deserved it

more.......endless crap made up to impress? constantly displaying double

standards

i was surprised that they were banned for insults..................i have never

noticed insults from hoggie? they always accept criticism without drama
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Depreciate Mountainman getting banned for mentioning that not so great WWII leader when others can bring him up with not an iota of care from the Mods.

If you say you ban someone for saying or invoking past historical bad guy then everyone else should also be banned for invoking that bad guy's name.

Its called hypocrisy, look it up.
 
May 18, 2009
3,757
0
0
ElChingon said:
Depreciate Mountainman getting banned for mentioning that not so great WWII leader when others can bring him up with not an iota of care from the Mods.

If you say you ban someone for saying or invoking past historical bad guy then everyone else should also be banned for invoking that bad guy's name.

Its called hypocrisy, look it up.

Hypocrisy? Doubtful, the unwritten clinic rules that are based upon where one aligns in the clinic is well known. It is mountainman's fault for not realizing this...if he wants to continue to play in here he needs to grasp this fact. He can PM me when he gets off ban and I can give him some pointers.
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
ChrisE said:
Hypocrisy? Doubtful, the unwritten clinic rules that are based upon where one aligns in the clinic is well known. It is mountainman's fault for not realizing this...if he wants to continue to play in here he needs to grasp this fact. He can PM me when he gets off ban and I can give him some pointers.

I have his Twitter handle it you want it. :cool:
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,662
8,583
28,180
ElChingon said:
Depreciate Mountainman getting banned for mentioning that not so great WWII leader when others can bring him up with not an iota of care from the Mods.

If you say you ban someone for saying or invoking past historical bad guy then everyone else should also be banned for invoking that bad guy's name.

Its called hypocrisy, look it up.

You must have missed the other (and main) reason for the ban.

I missed where you reported the other post you're referring to. You may have but I missed it. We're not responding 24/7, and do miss some reports.
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
red_flanders said:
You must have missed the other (and main) reason for the ban.

I missed where you reported the other post you're referring to. You may have but I missed it. We're not responding 24/7, and do miss some reports.

All's fair in equal, unbiased mod-ing then :rolleyes:
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Depreciating forum-ites getting banned for ignoring mods warning when mods don't get banned for ignoring Dan's warnings.
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
ElChingon said:
Depreciating forum-ites getting banned for ignoring mods warning when mods don't get banned for ignoring Dan's warnings.
Was this something that happened to Fuji, BlackCat, and Chewie?

No idea what was going on. Clear Warnings?
 
May 27, 2010
6,333
3
17,485
red_flanders said:
Not sure how to make it clear but the race angle in this topic is off topic and off limits. I've had to delete more posts. Next steps will unfortunately be thread closure and/or more bans. Please move on.

Much appreciated that you have cleaned up that thread - even though I am a big fan of some of those with short vacations.

Thanks.

Dave.
 
Oct 16, 2012
10,364
179
22,680
Why was a poster called Truth & Reconcilliation Banned, I read through there posts and could see nothing warranting a ban?
 
May 27, 2010
6,333
3
17,485
Should we also offer our appreciation to suspended members on this thread?

Sometimes one of us appears to take one for the team. That gets my appreciation.

Dave.
 
Feb 25, 2011
2,538
0
11,480
D-Queued said:
Should we also offer our appreciation to suspended members on this thread?

Sometimes one of us appears to take one for the team. That gets my appreciation.

Dave.
moi aussi!

merci, le porc :p
 
?

D-Queued said:
Should we also offer our appreciation to suspended members on this thread?

why?...............for providing entertainment

hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week

hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?

is that fair?
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
ebandit said:
why?...............for providing entertainment

hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week

hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?

is that fair?


So Joachim was banned for a spat with the hog?

no.

He was flaming and insulting half the forum. Youd be hard pressed to find a post where he wasnt trying to troll someone or another.

For someone supposedly so anti trolling in the case of the hog you are quite the apologist for others.
 
Feb 25, 2011
2,538
0
11,480
ebandit said:
why?...............for providing entertainment

hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week

hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?

is that fair?
we don't know the story behind it.

a permanent ban is typically reserved for those who have already been banned returning as another entity.

i know it still smarts that people thought you were Polish because of your style and excessive use of periods, but understand: BPC, sons of BPC, daughters of BPC, lovers of BPC, whatever, truly do make threads here unreadable.

there is only so much obfuscation a person can take. every other post is really trying.
 
Feb 25, 2011
2,538
0
11,480
ebandit said:
but recently hoggie was very much into 'trolling / flaming' mode too

only difference was joachim and hog were locked in opposition during any
debate
Joachim was very likely a troll, a banned member returning -- the same thing that you were accused of. in your case, you were able to prove you weren't and returned and continue with the periods lest we forget.

if Joaquim is able to prove he is not, he will return. and we will be in for endless unreadable threads.

Hog is the Hog is the Hog. he doesn't need to come back as anyone else.

he is The Hog.

(i know you're still sore about your ban, but sometimes the mods actually know what they're doing -- even if they may need a bit of prodding.)
 
Dec 30, 2011
3,547
0
0
thirteen said:
J

Hog is the Hog is the Hog. he doesn't need to come back as anyone else.

he is The Hog.

Hmmm... I guess you are right.
So lets clarify: So the Hog is the Hog so he can come back as the Hog.

No answer to that one.

Joachim was asking for a ban unfortunately but then the Hog has been asking for bans for who knows how long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.