Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

[Djave Bikinus]

Seem to have touched a nerve here. He's obviously a mate of yours

I prefer to think of the victims not the perpetrators. I'm not sure, in your shoes, I'd be wanting to stick up for a perpetrator.

P.s. I'm gay. Women's breasts don't do it for me.

 

[thirteen]

actually, he's not a mate of mine, Djave.

i would stand up for anyone you did this to, even a troll like Joaquim, as i find your actions reprehensible and vile. i prefer to stick up for the victims.

so you're gay, good for you. i hope you're happy... but why then did you want to check out his perv sites? just so you could rub it in in case people missed your first, second, third, or fourth post?

he's playing you, lol, and you've fallen for it hook, line, and sinker.

 

[Djave Bikinus]

He's playing me?

Wtf

You've a bizarre moral compass.

 

[Mellow Velo]

So you join on the 30th of january, after Joaquim was banned and you seem to know all about that user getting banned and drop names of some other CN Forum members.

Interesting...

Mmmm, interesting.

Talking of new members, I see horsinabout has been posting like an old clinic cynic and he only joined a week earlier.
Better to sock puppet up in advance, if you are expecting a spot of leave?

he's playing you, lol, and you've fallen for it hook, line, and sinker.

Too right.
He tried to reel me in on the same evening, only I left him with an empty rod in his hand.

 

[Fearless Greg Lemond]

Why do people not ignore?

Compare
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=19558

to
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=19855

The guy/girl even has matching numbers, lol.

//ignore, and, just enjoy this most of the times very nice forum.

 

[ElChingon]

Depreciating forumites posting non Apreciative/Depreciative posts here, why can't your bickering continue in those pointless Sky threads.

 

[mewmewmew13]

Out of sheer work avoidance and nosiness, I put 'Joachim banned' as a search string in Twitter earlier, it came up with a tweet from 'Mew' asking 'JimSteel56' if he'd paid the price for getting Joaquin banned.

I looked at JimSteel56's tweets and there were two may seem relevant. There was a discussion about Joaquin and Jim said something like "Don't worry, I'll bait him into a ban".

Jimsteel identified himself to another tweeter with " my forum name is thehog".

It wasn't very pleasant reading. Lots of real nastiness from a bunch of people who seemed connected with CN. The only other name I remember was 'Sitting Bison' if that means anything.

It appears theyve now all locked down their twitter accounts.

Probably just as well. A brief look at who Jim/thehog follows revealed something called 'creep shots'. He was following lots of creep shot sites. These was news to me but they appear to be where people post peeping Tom (voyeuristic) photos taken furtively of unsuspecting women's breasts and bottoms.

Not very nice.

WHAT??
Are you in some other twitter land? You are attributing a lot of false assumptions here...

Joachim was not banned due to one twitter posting...
he was banned by the mods most likely for being a repeAt offender and only being here to cause trouble.

You are speculating about twitter 'followers' and 'followed ' accounts to define a person?? Calling someone 'not nice' from a stilted perspective ??....

Twitter is a joke and a lot of things on there are not the real world...including messages and comments that you are trying to decipher and piece together...
Better sleuthing on google than twitter anyway..

good luck..

 

[Djave Bikinus]

Hey! You must be the Mew in that nasty little gang on twitter who meet up and decide who they are going to bait on CN!

Hi!!

You seem a little panicky, by the way. Don't worry there's probably a bit more time to finish cleaning up your twitter account

Just curious, are you an apologist for sexual abuse too?

 

[Semper Fidelis]

WHAT??
Are you in some other twitter land? You are attributing a lot of false assumptions here...

Joachim was not banned due to one twitter posting...
he was banned by the mods most likely for being a repeAt offender and only being here to cause trouble.

You are speculating about twitter 'followers' and 'followed ' accounts to define a person?? Calling someone 'not nice' from a stilted perspective ??....

Twitter is a joke and a lot of things on there are not the real world...including messages and comments that you are trying to decipher and piece together...
Better sleuthing on google than twitter anyway..

good luck..

True Mew. I was going to chime in and say that I do not think any of the twitter accounts are blocked up or locked from sight so I am not sure what that part of their post was about.

The part that I agreed with was that there was talk on twitter about bannination and people being banninated etc. BUT the part about digging into somone's followers and singling out something like what was or is being discussed is off limits here ...in my opinion.

Anyhow ...where is ChrisE and Python when you need them? They could fix this in a flash.

 

[the asian]

Why do people not ignore?

Compare
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=19558

to
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=19855

The guy/girl even has matching numbers, lol.

//ignore, and, just enjoy this most of the times very nice forum.

Nice find. Unable to change the modus operandi.

 

[Djave Bikinus]

. BUT the part about digging into somone's followers and singling out something like what was or is being discussed is off limits here ...in my opinion.

It just looked very illustrative of the sort of person we are talking about really, underhand, scheming, totally dishonest and rather prurient.

It's pictures of victim's breasts taken without their knowledge. I don't think that is ok, and I think people like that should be exposed. How would you feel if it was pictures of children for sexual purposes?

I don't see a huge difference. None of this is consensual or respectful in any way.

Expose people like this and do your bit to stop it. Doesn't matter where it is exposed.

Silence it and you are complicit.

 

[thirteen]

It just looked very illustrative of the sort of person we are talking about really, underhand, scheming, totally dishonest and rather prurient.

It's pictures of victim's breasts taken without their knowledge. I don't think that is ok, and I think people like that should be exposed. How would you feel if it was pictures of children for sexual purposes?

I don't see a huge difference. None of this is consensual or respectful in any way.

Expose people like this and do your bit to stop it. Doesn't matter where it is exposed.

Silence it and you are complicit.

keep it going, my lovely.

he has played you and played you perfectly. pitch perfect, in fact

where's the popcorn?

 

[Djave Bikinus]

That's a pretty bizarre logic, and you clearly haven't thought very hard about it.

But then again, I guess you'll just turn out to be one of his little nasty Twitter coven, trying to cover for him and his vile sexual exploitation of unknowing victims.

You really should give a little more thought to exactly what it is you are covering for.

Yuk.

Some of you guys are really slimy.

 

[Fearless Greg Lemond]

Hey! You must be the Mew in that nasty little gang on twitter who meet up and decide who they are going to bait on CN!

Hi!!

You seem a little panicky, by the way. Don't worry there's probably a bit more time to finish cleaning up your twitter account

Just curious, are you an apologist for sexual abuse too?

Shall us make a poll for ya what your future forum name will be?

A: Bradislav Wigauskus
B: Christoffel
C: Portable Riccardo
D: Gertje
E: Joaquin

Now, do everyone a favour and just creep back in the cave.

BUT the part about digging into somone's followers and singling out something like what was or is being discussed is off limits here ...in my opinion

It is quite sick, sort of.

Should remind people of the modus operandi of sociopaths.

//ignore with a big smile

 

[thirteen]

That's a pretty bizarre logic, and you clearly haven't thought very hard about it.

But then again, I guess you'll just turn out to be one of his little nasty Twitter coven, trying to cover for him and his vile sexual exploitation of unknowing victims.

You really should give a little more thought to exactly what it is you are covering for.

Yuk.

Some of you guys are really slimy.

playing you, playing you, playing you...

this would be such fun if you hadn't come back as such a disgusting persona. in fact, i find it vile that you say you're gay. you're not. but you've already tried the girl thing and that didn't work either, so wtf.

sorry, charlie.

 

[Djave Bikinus]

bile bile bile

Hi Barry Scherpers! You are here too!!!

Just Sitting Bison to go and we've got a full house and it's

....Bingo Dingo!!!

 

[Djave Bikinus]

I'm an apologist for sexual abuse

I'm embarrased for you

 

[Fearless Greg Lemond]

At least I am not anonymous, cheerio. Twitter warrior.

See ya with your next forumname, I guess.

 

[Havetts]

Holy crap, the dedication. Please, dox me too.

 

[thirteen]

I'm embarrased for you

why how darling of you to notice!

everybody here always says that about me

 

[Sylvester]

Glad I didn't miss this soap opera.

Some nice posts on the last few pages, keep the good work up, Fearless Greg Lemond!

 

[Djave Bikinus]

why how darling of you to notice!

Don't be pleased about out it. Thirteen.

Quite apart from your apologism for sexual predators, you are also not nearly as clever as you think you are.

If thehog/jim Steele is playing me....playing me...playing me, by lacing the list of people he follows with revolting sexual abuse Twitter sites, in some bizarre way to presumably 'catch me out', then why your outrage that I have posted his 'fake' personal details...

i find prying into someone's personal life and posting it here is quite offensive..

Doh!

Playing you... playing you....playing you....

 

[Djave Bikinus]

p.s. Can somebody tell the hog, that now he has finished cleaning up his Tweets of anything incriminating, and clearing out his 'Followed' list of sexual abuse sites to go back and remove the one he missed

 

[Djave Bikinus]

Ahh good old internet, eh?

Never quite know who you are fu<king with.



And like that...he was gone.....

 

[Semper Fidelis]

snip

Well the topic is appreciation / depreciation of Banninated members. Not someone x preference or someone's opinion of anothers preference.

Really it is all about Bannination.