Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

[The Hitch]

Hmmm... I guess you are right.
So lets clarify: So the Hog is the Hog so he can come back as the Hog.

No answer to that one.

Joachim was asking for a ban unfortunately but then the Hog has been asking for bans for who knows how long.

I suppose what it is is that hog has shown he can contribute to the forum without trolling(eg offering links to the landis thread).

Joachim has not. He only joined a month or 2 ago and has contributed nothing but flaming and baiting from the word go, in a very direct manner no less. He was given a warning and ban but chose to continue even worse.

Thats what i understand. Personally id prefer a far longer ban for the hog who's fake insider information, overreactions, insults etc offer nothing

But im surprised at peoples willingness to defend joachim. Hog has been told to stfu by a number of us on the sky "haterz" side (as have some others- and their ideas mocked). I even dug into him big time in your defense yesterday over the comments he made to you about going to sleep with a Bailsford teddy bear.
And his trolling was never anywhere near as bad or direct in the first place.

Joachim meanwhile strutted around as he pleased shoving what baits he could think of directly into peoples faces and carefully worded every post for maximum baiting effects (eg - "shrill rantings of internet loons") and i didnt see a word from the sky side telling him he was out of line and derailing the discussion.

As such what resistance he got was always dismissed as "bitter" "trolls" who live with their mums.

And now im hearing how because hog was only given a week joachim should be look favorably upon?no the way to look at it is - joachim got a lifeban he deserved. How long should hog's sentence have been. And the beginning of that answer is- not as much,

 

[Cyivel]

Y'all need to stop being such drama queens.

In memory of the departed Hog, I'll bump my own post from earlier in this thread.

 

[sittingbison]

the problem for me is Joachim sent out 700 posts in less than 2 months alienating many readers and members in the process by being smarmy and clearly baiting. Reminiscent of one Laura Lyn. Again threads became unreadable and unbearable.

The question is why did it take 700 posts and two months to ban "him". I suspect there must have been a fair few PMs flying around complaining.

 

[ElChingon]

the problem for me is Joachim sent out 700 posts in less than 2 months alienating many readers and members in the process by being smarmy and clearly baiting. Reminiscent of one Laura Lyn. Again threads became unreadable and unbearable.

The question is why did it take 700 posts and two months to ban "him". I suspect there must have been a fair few PMs flying around complaining.

He was a front runner for our S.P. thread which is now locked, the posts stating so are still there in the threads but no one reads them that can do anything. There are still a solid couple current ex-members on the prowl, give it time.

 

[D-Queued]

...

Thats what i understand. Personally id prefer a far longer ban for the hog who's fake insider information, overreactions, insults etc offer nothing

...

I recently validated one of thehog's connections. It is solid.

However, that connection (and others) may not always have correct or reliable information.

Dave.

 

[mewmewmew13]

why?...............for providing entertainment

hoggie v joachim spat 1..............hoggie banned 24 hrs joachim 1 week

hoggie v joachim spat 2..............hoggie banned 1 week joachim probably
permanently banned?

is that fair?

Exactly like hitch said...joachim's sole purpose here to flame.

I mentioned that he was in the wrong thread/off topic and he flamed me up and down. Not your normal response....

 

[mewmewmew13]

the problem for me is Joachim sent out 700 posts in less than 2 months alienating many readers and members in the process by being smarmy and clearly baiting. Reminiscent of one Laura Lyn. Again threads became unreadable and unbearable.

The question is why did it take 700 posts and two months to ban "him". I suspect there must have been a fair few PMs flying around complaining.

Bingo dingo

 

[will10]

Joachim will be back. He was hammering out 20 posts a day at literally all hours of the day (assuring us along the way that he did have a life, honest). He won't be able to handle going cold turkey.

 

[Caruut]

Joachim will be back. He was hammering out 20 posts a day at literally all hours of the day (assuring us along the way that he did have a life, honest). He won't be able to handle going cold turkey.

I agree. Don't think we've seen the last of him. He was a pretty good troll, though, a lot more effective than some you see.

 

[MarkvW]

I agree. Don't think we've seen the last of him. He was a pretty good troll, though, a lot more effective than some you see.

I enjoyed his posts--except for the condescending and insulting tone that he almost constantly took. Sometimes he took very effective pokes at the Clinic's conventional wisdom.

 

[Benotti69]

the problem for me is Joachim sent out 700 posts in less than 2 months alienating many readers and members in the process by being smarmy and clearly baiting. Reminiscent of one Laura Lyn. Again threads became unreadable and unbearable.

The question is why did it take 700 posts and two months to ban "him". I suspect there must have been a fair few PMs flying around complaining.

I have no doubt the poster is already back here. Yep it will take 2 months of post reporting and warnings before a ban is made, meanwhile they will have derailed the sky threads for the umpteenth time.

I think Joachim only posted to try and get Hog banned.

 

[thirteen]

I have no doubt the poster is already back here. Yep it will take 2 months of post reporting and warnings before a ban is made, meanwhile they will have derailed the sky threads for the umpteenth time.

I think Joachim only posted to try and get Hog banned.

and even more annoying in the current incarnation

 

[ebandit]

mission

I think Joachim only posted to try and get Hog banned.

and did hoggie tweet that it was their 'mission' to get joachim banned?

sure some members can be annoying but sometimes one must be 'man'
enough to take it on the chin

 

[thirteen]

and did hoggie tweet that it was his 'mission' to get joachim banned?

sure some members can be annoying but sometimes one must be 'man'
enough to take it on the chin

what i can't stand is post after post after post, designed to obfuscate.

i can handle alternate views leading to good discussion (thank god for PM). what i can't do is be a "man" (no desire to be) and put up with the trolling of someone doing his/her utmost to make sure no meaningful discussion will ever take place and/or get lost in the babble.

it makes me want to request that someone PM me if anything pertinent to the discussion has been posted

i will give "Joaquim" credit in that he answered a question i posted quite nicely and, seemingly, honestly... but that doesn't make up for the months of making certain threads unreadable.

hog went overboard, sure, but the mods need a good shove now and again... it's a pity that when he comes back, there's fresh fish to fry, but it's really just the same old, same old.

 

[Mellow Velo]

I have no doubt the poster is already back here. Yep it will take 2 months of post reporting and warnings before a ban is made, meanwhile they will have derailed the sky threads for the umpteenth time.

I think Joachim only posted to try and get Hog banned.

The Sky threads derail because of the lack of new material.
So, old stuff gets regurgitated in ever more ridiculous guises.
Would the Clinic's cynics really be happy, if all they had was to continually congratulate eachother, over increasingly outlandish claims?
I think not. Forum verbal jousting much more entertaining.


Anyhow, one Twitter boast and Joachim is toast.

Many have now seen said tweet.

It's his MO: Others have smelt the Hog's baited breath on their neck.

Friends in low places.

Back with his hoggie hook in just a few days.

 

[Benotti69]

and did hoggie tweet that it was their 'mission' to get joachim banned?

sure some members can be annoying but sometimes one must be 'man'
enough to take it on the chin

plenty are annoying but Joachim had an agenda. big difference.

 

[Benotti69]

The Sky threads derail because of the lack of new material.
So, old stuff gets regurgitated in ever more ridiculous guises.
Would the Clinic's cynics really be happy, if all they had was to continually congratulate eachother, over increasingly outlandish claims?
I think not. Forum verbal jousting much more entertaining.


Anyhow, one Twitter boast and Joachim is toast.

Many have now seen said tweet.

It's his MO: Others have smelt the Hog's baited breath on their neck.

Friends in low places.

Back with his hoggie hook in just a few days.

any chance of a link to said tweet?

 

[Djave Bikinus]

Out of sheer work avoidance and nosiness, I put 'Joachim banned' as a search string in Twitter earlier, it came up with a tweet from 'Mew' asking 'JimSteel56' if he'd paid the price for getting Joaquin banned.

I looked at JimSteel56's tweets and there were two may seem relevant. There was a discussion about Joaquin and Jim said something like "Don't worry, I'll bait him into a ban".

Jimsteel identified himself to another tweeter with " my forum name is thehog".

It wasn't very pleasant reading. Lots of real nastiness from a bunch of people who seemed connected with CN. The only other name I remember was 'Sitting Bison' if that means anything.

It appears theyve now all locked down their twitter accounts.

Probably just as well. A brief look at who Jim/thehog follows revealed something called 'creep shots'. He was following lots of creep shot sites. These was news to me but they appear to be where people post peeping Tom (voyeuristic) photos taken furtively of unsuspecting women's breasts and bottoms.

Not very nice.

 

[Semper Fidelis]

The Sky threads derail because of the lack of new material.
So, old stuff gets regurgitated in ever more ridiculous guises.
Would the Clinic's cynics really be happy, if all they had was to continually congratulate eachother, over increasingly outlandish claims?
I think not. Forum verbal jousting much more entertaining.


Anyhow, one Twitter boast and Joachim is toast.

Many have now seen said tweet.

It's his MO: Others have smelt the Hog's baited breath on their neck.

Friends in low places.

Back with his hoggie hook in just a few days.

any chance of a link to said tweet?

Nice one Mellow Velo! One twitter boast and Joachim is toast.

Why ask for a link to something that more than one person read on twitter? I also was in the group to have seen the tweet. To bad you don't have a twitter account.

 

[the asian]

Out of sheer work avoidance and nosiness, I put 'Joachim banned' as a search string in Twitter earlier, it came up with a tweet from 'Mew' asking 'JimSteel56' if he'd paid the price for getting Joaquin banned.

I looked at JimSteel56's tweets and there were two may seem relevant. There was a discussion about Joaquin and Jim said something like "Don't worry, I'll bait him into a ban".

Jimsteel identified himself to another tweeter with " my forum name is thehog".

It wasn't very pleasant reading. Lots of real nastiness from a bunch of people who seemed connected with CN. The only other name I remember was 'Sitting Bison' if that means anything.

It appears theyve now all locked down their twitter accounts.

Probably just as well. A brief look at who Jim/thehog follows revealed something called 'creep shots'. He was following lots of creep shot sites. These was news to me but they appear to be where people post peeping Tom (voyeuristic) photos taken furtively of unsuspecting women's breasts and bottoms.

Not very nice.

So you join on the 30th of january, after Joaquim was banned and you seem to know all about that user getting banned and drop names of some other CN Forum members.

Interesting...

 

[Semper Fidelis]

Out of sheer work avoidance and nosiness, I put 'Joachim banned' as a search string in Twitter earlier, it came up with a tweet from 'Mew' asking 'JimSteel56' if he'd paid the price for getting Joaquin banned.

I looked at JimSteel56's tweets and there were two may seem relevant. There was a discussion about Joaquin and Jim said something like "Don't worry, I'll bait him into a ban".

Jimsteel identified himself to another tweeter with " my forum name is thehog".

It wasn't very pleasant reading. Lots of real nastiness from a bunch of people who seemed connected with CN. The only other name I remember was 'Sitting Bison' if that means anything.

It appears theyve now all locked down their twitter accounts.

Probably just as well. A brief look at who Jim/thehog follows revealed something called 'creep shots'. He was following lots of creep shot sites. These was news to me but they appear to be where people post peeping Tom (voyeuristic) photos taken furtively of unsuspecting women's breasts and bottoms.

Not very nice.

Carefule Benotti69 will be asking for links like the tweets do not exist.

 

[thirteen]

So you join on the 30th of january, after Joaquim was banned and you seem to know all about that user getting banned and drop names of some other CN Forum members.

Interesting...

very.

i find prying into someone's personal life and posting it here is quite offensive.

Djave Bikinus, you are really creepy.

 

[Djave Bikinus]

So you join on the 30th of january, after Joaquim was banned and you seem to know all about that user getting banned and drop names of some other CN Forum members.

Interesting...

What the **** is this?The ****ing twilight zone? Whatevers innit. Right now Im just interested in finding out more about what the hell 'creeping sites' are about.There are pervs everywhere on the net but I didn't know people got their rocks off to that.Really weird. Wish Jim Steele or the hog or whoever the **** he is hadnt locked down his twitter account then I could go back and have a perv myself.

weird

 

[Djave Bikinus]

very.

i find prying into someone's personal life and posting it here is quite offensive.

Djave Bikinus, you are really creepy.

Funny thatz

I guess you approve of people taking unsolicited photos of unknowing victims breasts and publishing them on the Internet for pervs to jerk off too.

Not to mention the fact that that person's personal life was also publishèd on the Internet for all to see. I'd be wanting to hide that kind of stuff if I was a perv, not have it in my Twitter followed page.

 

[thirteen]

What the **** is this?The ****ing twilight zone? Whatevers innit. Right now Im just interested in finding out more about what the hell 'creeping sites' are about.There are pervs everywhere on the net but I didn't know people got their rocks off to that.Really weird. Wish Jim Steele or the hog or whoever the **** he is hadnt locked down his twitter account then I could go back and have a perv myself.

weird

Funny thatz

I guess you approve of people taking unsolicited photos of unknowing victims breasts and publishing them on the Internet for pervs to jerk off too.

Not to mention the fact that that person's personal life was also publishèd on the Internet for all to see. I'd be wanting to hide that kind of stuff if I was a perv, not have it in my Twitter followed page.

you are really sick, you know that?

he's following hundreds of people. to be honest, i wouldn't put it past him to have followed some of those users just to give you something to dig yourself a grave with.

the hog is a master! he draws out the trolls without even having to be here

and you're a smart fellow Djave, i'm sure you can find enough perv sites all on your own and have a tremendous w@nk.

i hope you enjoy your thirty seconds!