Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

[Dr. Maserati]

I agree with this, and also with Parrot's comments. It really is high time that we get an 'official' statement about the increasingly blatant double standards being applied to some posters who are evidently more 'favored' than others. And please, something more than a simple denial.

Hardly double standards - the Hog just about keeps his trolling (my opinion) in check. He actually uses a little truth which baits the Sky fans.
Joachim may have actually been more factually correct - however they were blatantly being abusive and personal.

 

[MarkvW]

We need more grounds to ban someone than "everyone knows"....... that is hardly proof. Do you have any?

Susan

How about "universal truth?"

 

[Granville57]

I see the Hog is back ruining threads...

Nonsense. thehog has never posted anything that could be construed as "ruining" a thread.

 

[Granville57]

Nonsense. thehog has never posted anything that could be construed as "ruining" a thread.

That's an excellent point.

 

[ElChingon]

How about "universal truth?"

Funny, I have posts from Mod's breaking the rules and have sent them in and guess what, nothing. Of course they state that its ok but somehow those posts have disappeared, hum... not a bad post but they choose to remove them, nothing fishing going on there.

 

[MarkvW]

That's an excellent point.

Thank you for that post! Nothing on this forum has made me laugh like this since I started participating here!

 

[sittingbison]

Yes and the Hog was never actually gone during his suspension. How often will we see Horsinabout post from now on

Hell, I thought Joachim was a muppet and deserved to be banned but I don't get the double standards at all.

Also, Sittingbison is not a suitable moderator at all.

Thanks pmcg76, nice of you to say that about me in the same post where you accuse others of being sockpuppets and muppets.

Care to elaborate?

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

That's an excellent point.

Haha.

The problem with this is that the mods have now set a precedent. So now everyone can start quoting their own posts and if mods complain it clearly proves a double standard.

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

The problem with this is that the mods have now set a precedent. So now everyone can start quoting their own posts and if mods complain it clearly proves a double standard.

Great post Pedro.

 

[Ferminal]

If anyone wants to join the "quote yourself" club, be my guest

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

If anyone wants to join the "quote yourself" club, be my guest

Great post Ferminal.

 

[pmcg76]

Thanks pmcg76, nice of you to say that about me in the same post where you accuse others of being sockpuppets and muppets.

Care to elaborate?

It was an afterthought tbh, I do not put you is the same bracket as those I mentioned.

Personally I think mods should be relatively open-minded on all subjects which definitely does not apply to you. To me a mod is like a ref in that they are there to keep a control of things and enforce the rules, if the ref has a clear bias for one side they are not usually considered as being suitable for behaving impartially.

 

[The Hitch]

Great post Ferminal.

You are supposed to start a new thread everytime you have something new to add. Posting in old threads is only for when you've made the point before.

 

[sittingbison]

It was an afterthought tbh, I do not put you is the same bracket as those I mentioned.

Personally I think mods should be relatively open-minded on all subjects which definitely does not apply to you. To me a mod is like a ref in that they are there to keep a control of things and enforce the rules, if the ref has a clear bias for one side they are not usually considered as being suitable for behaving impartially.

A clear bias? Not open minded? Prey tell.

As to modding, would you like to point out where I haven't been impartial, keeping control or enforcing the rules?

As far as I knew, as a poster I'm allowed an opinion just like anyone else.

 

[BroDeal]

I, for one, welcome thehog back. Tuesday would not be the same without him. Funny how we never had much problem with thehog until the Skrybabies started complaining about everyone who questions The Miracle.

 

[Mad Elephant Man]

I, for one, welcome thehog back. Tuesday would not be the same without him. Funny how we never had much problem with thehog until the Skrybabies started complaining about everyone who questions The Miracle.

Skrybabies, LOL

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

I, for one, welcome thehog back. Tuesday would not be the same without him. Funny how we never had much problem with thehog until the Skrybabies started complaining about everyone who questions The Miracle.

Even funnier how the same 'Skrybabies' don't seem to have such a problem with other posters that question the 'Miracle'

Maybe you should stick to your obsession with tossing salads eh, Chef?

 

[BroDeal]

Even funnier how the same 'Skrybabies' don't seem to have such a problem with other posters that question the 'Miracle'

Maybe you should stick to your obsession with tossing salads eh, Chef?

It did not take much to show the Sky fans take it personally when anyone questions The Miracle; and, your honor, seeing how the opposition has proved my point for me, I rest my case.

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

It did not take much to show the Sky fans take it personally when anyone questions The Miracle; and, your honor, seeing how the opposition has proved my point for me, I rest my case.

Chef, given that no such thing has been proven I will throw the case out on account of incompetence on behalf of the claimant's council.

 

[ElChingon]

Take it to the Sky threads, we don't need another Sky BS thread here.

 

[BroDeal]

Chef, given that no such thing has been proven I will throw the case out on account of incompetence on behalf of the claimant's council.

Uh-oh. Pedro getting mad. Pedro wanna smash!

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

Uh-oh. Pedro getting mad. Pedro wanna smash!

Haha. Straight from TheHog playbook. Claim the poster is getting mad (angry) because you are either wrong and/or can't think make a decent argument. You can do better then that Chef.

 

[Hugh Januss]

I would think this whole Sky doping thing was just funnier that sh!t and the product of combining pie in the sky (see what I did) fanboyism with psycho conspiracy theory haterism and getting ............well you see. Nothing going on here..... if it wasn't for the fact that I know I have seen this world go by before, with that Lance guy and his crew of nasty haters and ignorant fanboys.

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

I would think this whole Sky doping thing was just funnier that sh!t and the product of combining pie in the sky (see what I did) fanboyism with psycho conspiracy theory haterism and getting ............well you see. Nothing going on here..... if it wasn't for the fact that I know I have seen this world go by before, with that Lance guy and his crew of nasty haters and ignorant fanboys.

Funny how no one had really mentioned Sky and then one of the usual suspects tries to shoe-horn it in.

btw Hugh Januss and Bro 'Tossing Salad' Deal. Surely you two were made for each other (see what I did)? On that I will leave you two to it.

 

[Hugh Januss]

Funny how no one had really mentioned Sky and then one of the usual suspects tries to shoe-horn it in.

btw Hugh Januss and Bro 'Tossing Salad' Deal. Surely you two were made for each other (see what I did)? On that I will leave you two to it.

Says the guy with the Sky kit avatar.
See what you did.
BTW. Sentence structure, look it up, improve.