• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.


Mental or random cycling statistics

Page 24 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Has anyone won the final grand tour of the season after starting & finishing all three?
No. Nencini did all three in 1957, winning the Giro, but that was not the third of the three.
That was one of 2 occasions when a rider top tenned in all three, Geminiani having done so 2 years earlier. The closest anyone has come since was Valverde in 2016, with 3rd, 6th, 12th.

Assuming that pre 1995 the Tour was always the last of the three, the best finish in the third of three completed GTs was Sastre's 4th in the 2006 Vuelta.

If Wikipedia is to be trusted.
  • Like
Reactions: Izzyeviel
Cycling is like most sports: there can be only one winner. Except when there isn’t. There are a few more well-known examples where two riders were declared the winner - most famously the 1949 edition of Paris-Roubaix where André Mahé and Serse Coppi were controversially both declared winners (the final verdict only coming four months after the race), but also for example the 1961 version of Kuurne where the sprint was extremely tight and the photo finish was taken a metre before the line, rendering it impossible to separate Fred De Bruyne and Leon Van Daele, or a stage of the 1907 Tour where Louis Trousselier and Emile Georget shared the victory.

In the spirit of this thread, that begs a question - what is the record for the highest number of ex aequo finishers in the same race? Perhaps, in the early days of cycling, three or even four riders could not be separated at the line?

The reality, as it turns out, is much crazier. In the final stage of the 1920 Giro, no less than nine riders were declared the winner. I’m not actually sure what happened - BikeRaceInfo claims a horse broke onto the course during the sprint, disrupting the race completely, whereas Wikipedia tells me that some riders were sent onto the hippodrome where the race finished through the wrong entrance, causing another rider to overtake them. In any case, it appears that the GC times were retroactively taken at the entrance to the hippodrome (remind you of anything?).

As insane as that story is, it’s not even close to what I believe to be the real answer. Enter the 2004 Noord-Nederland Tour, where a mind-boggling 22 riders ended up sharing the victory.

22? In 2004?? How in the *** did that happen?

This article provides the answers. I’ve translated the relevant parts below, with a couple of appendages on my part.

Then, too, there were races where the convoying of the riders went completely wrong, and that was also the case on that warm day in June in the centre of Leeuwarden. A front group of no less than 22 riders, including the likes of Erik Dekker and Rudi Kemna, rode the final circuits in the middle of regular road traffic [because, as per a different source, the organisation sent them the wrong way]. The riders had enough of it and decided to come to a standstill on the finish line to demand a safe finale. Only Matthé Pronk decided to push on alone, but was ultimately not recognised as the leader within the race by the jury. I cannot recall whether the finish was actually safe after the restart, but I do recall Bobbie Traksel winning the race [in a sprint]. I interviewed the then-Rabobank rider, who was happy to win in his own country, the victory ceremony was carried out and riders and fans went their separate ways. For me, what remained was a short walk to the improvised press centre, where I was on my own. Doubtlessly, the Frisian press had left for their own workplaces. As luck would have it, the press centre was in the same room where the jury was meeting, because otherwise I, much like my Frisian colleagues, would have gone home thinking Bobbie Traksel had won the race.

As I was typing up my story, I noticed that the jury meeting was not following the usual pattern of ‘are there any questions, should we give the organisation any advice, good work everyone’. The Briton Ken Farmes, supported by the Dutchman Erwin Kistemaker, decided to annul the race results and declare all 22 riders in the front group as the winners. Look it up on ProCyclingStats: not only Bobbie Traksel won the race, but also Niels Scheuneman, the late Arno Wallaard, Rudie Kemna, Bert Hiemstra, Matthé Pronk, Marvin van der Pluijm, Eelke van der Wal, Erik Dekker, Tom Veelers, Gerben Lowik, Paul van Schalen, Arne Kornegoor, Rik Reinierink, Thorwald Veneberg, Stefan Kupfernagel, Roy Sentjens, Preben van Hecke, Igor Abakumov, Dennis Haueisen, Allan Bo Andresen and Nico Mattan. When I asked the jury for a reaction after the meeting, they answered that ‘because the finale could not be raced in a normal way, there can also be no winner’. As proof, I also received a result sheet in which a 1 had been noted in front of the first 22 riders. Bizarre.

Social media were not as developed then as they are now, so I quickly realised that Traksel himself did not yet know what the jury had declared to be the results. So I called his then-DS Adri van Houwelingen and took at least 10 minutes to convince both him and Traksel, in their Rabobank team car, that I was both sober and completely serious when I told them what had ended up happening in Leeuwarden. ‘I have the trophy of the organisation here in the car, for goodness sake!’, exclaimed Traksel, who called the victory ceremony a sham and, together with Van Houwelingen, criticised the jury and the security of Dutch courses [again, remind you of anything?].

Surely, that has to be one of the most surreal stories in the history of the sport, and also one that deserves mentioning in some other categories - most incompetent race organisation and most baffling jury decision, for example.
These last 10 years have seen a lot of first when it comes to GTs.

First Colombian winner - Quintana 2014
First Dutch winner - Dumoulin 2017
First British winner - Froome 2018
First Ecuadorian winner - Carapaz 2019 (also first Ecuadorian GT winner period)
First Australian winner - Hindley 2022
First Slovenian winner - Roglic 2023

First Colombian winner - Bernal 2019
First Slovenian winner - Pogacar 2020

First* British winner - Froome 2017
First Slovenian winner - Roglic 2019 (also first Slovenian GT winner period)

As well as first GT stage wins for the following countries:

Ecuador: Carapaz - Giro 2018
Eritrea: Girmay - Giro 2022

*Well... we all know what happened! Yes, I know he's also the winner of the 2011 Vuelta, but he wasn't originally.
Basically, when he won the Vuelta in 2017, that was the first time he - or any British rider - had won the Vuelta, but then - in 2019 - he also won the Vuelta in 2011. Makes perfect sense.
Remco is the first rider born this century to win a grand tour
Alfredo Binda was the first rider born in the 20th century to win a grand tour
Maurice Garin was the first rider born in the 19th century to win a grand tour

Makes you wonder who the first rider born in the 22nd century to win a grand tour will be.

"The 21st (twenty-first) century is the current century in the Anno Domini or Common Era, in accordance with the Gregorian calendar. It began on 1 January 2001 (MMI) and will end on 31 December 2100 (MMC). It is the first century of the 3rd millennium."
Wait what? Sounds so crazy that 1900 is 18th century etc.
Didn't know about that distinction with "It is distinct from the century known as the 2000s, which began on 1 January 2000 and will end on 31 December 2099."