Mental or random cycling statistics

[Panda Claws]

That‘s because it‘s not.

19th century I meant lmao.

 

[Panda Claws]

Other way around 1900s = 20th Century.

No Wikipedia says that 1800, 1900, 2000 is part of 1800s, 1900s, 2000s but not of 19th, 20th amd 21st century.

The 1900s are but 1900 itself is not.

Unless Netserk sneakily edited that page.

 

[Netserk]

No Wikipedia says that 1800, 1900, 2000 is part of 1800s, 1900s, 2000s but not of 19th, 20th amd 21st century.

The 1900s are but 1900 itself is not.

Unless Netserk sneakily edited that page.

It's very simple. The first century covers the first 100 years. There's no year 0, so it covers the years 1-100.

 

[Panda Claws]

It's very simple. The first century covers the first 100 years. There's no year 0, so it covers the years 1-100.

Yes it makes sense to me just hadn't thought about it before.

In practice mostly everyone uses the 1900s, 2000s, etc. definition in day-to-day life imo.

 

[RedheadDane]

This is the first year since 2018 where non of the GT winners also won the BYR competition.

2019: Bernal won the Tour
2020: Pogacar won the Tour, Geoghegan Hart won the Giro (ahead of Hindley, who was - in fact - also in the BYR competition)
2021: Bernal won the Giro, Pogacar won the Tour (ahead of Vingegaard, who was - in fact - also in the BYR competition)
2022: Evenepoel won the Vuelta (another guy in the BYR competition - Ayuso - finished third)

 

[Armchair cyclist]

Makes you wonder who the first rider born in the 22nd century to win a grand tour will be.

If you think you know, and want to have wealthy great grandchildren, contact your local bookmaker today.

 

[Finn84]

Makes you wonder who the first rider born in the 22nd century to win a grand tour will be.

I would say almost all of us in the forum aren't going to see that.

 

[Samu Cuenca]

I'm planning on getting reborn in January of 2100/2101, so I'll happily pick up any earnings from successful bets on your behalves.