Let's "circle back" in 12 months. I predict Movistar regrets letting him go and will have fewer victories. Valverde isn't getting any younger and Mas is not a stage or one day winner.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Mas is actually pretty consistent, but that's the reason he rarely wins. He's always just behind the best riders in GC.With all respect to Movistar... getting rid of MAL at this point is absurd. Valverde is old and Mas isn't consistent.
Yeah, consistent in finishing top 5. Not really impressive for sponsors.Mas is actually pretty consistent, but that's the reason he rarely wins. He's always just behind the best riders in GC.
Well, it didn't have to do with what you said but what he did on stage 20 of La Vuelta. I thought that was very clear.With all respect to Movistar... getting rid of MAL at this point is absurd. Valverde is old and Mas isn't consistent.
With all respect to Movistar... getting rid of MAL at this point is absurd. Valverde is old and Mas isn't consistent.
Yeah, always good when a team gets rid of their winningest rider.
With all respect to Movistar... getting rid of MAL at this point is absurd. Valverde is old and Mas isn't consistent.
If he works for Vino he probably understands the consequences of screwing over the Kazakhs. It won't happen with him again but he's going to have a tougher time regaining support on a team he already left once and now returns as scolded kid. He's a great rider and he let his emotions carry him away.well, if the rider wants to work for vino, who knows why, and uses pathetic tricks to achieve that, let’s hope the door doesn’t hit him on the way out too hard. or do we still think his temper tantrum at vuelta was just him being a ***?
MAL isn't a one day winner either, in fact he basically doesn't ride one day races at all. Any suggestion that Movistar will somehow come to regret this decision makes no sense whatsoever. MAL made this decision for them.Let's "circle back" in 12 months. I predict Movistar regrets letting him go and will have fewer victories. Valverde isn't getting any younger and Mas is not a stage or one day winner.
Was definitely calling Vinokoerov just before disappearing from La Vuelta.He only left Astaná because Yana Seel tried to lowball him on his wage, he wanted to stay for the same amount of money. The team also doesn't mind the fact that he prefers to ride Giro-Vuelta because he wants to stay away from the hecric first week of the Tour (that would have been a smarter option for Movistar too, instead of having him and Mas as co-leaders in the same 2 gts).
He only left Astaná because Yana Seel tried to lowball him on his wage, he wanted to stay for the same amount of money. The team also doesn't mind the fact that he prefers to ride Giro-Vuelta because he wants to stay away from the hecric first week of the Tour (that would have been a smarter option for Movistar too, instead of having him and Mas as co-leaders in the same 2 gts).
Maybe to put food on the table for his family. He can't quit cycling just to please you or anybody that is not pleased with his act. He made a mistake, just like a human being, especially if you have issues. But certainly he needs to move on, just like his team did.well, if the rider wants to work for vino, who knows why, and uses pathetic tricks to achieve that, let’s hope the door doesn’t hit him on the way out too hard. or do we still think his temper tantrum at vuelta was just him being a ***?
I still think he would have been taken to the Tour. No way Movistar loses a chance to win a mountain stage with him.Well, he wouldn't have been ready to do the Giro anyway, he only started his season in Romandie.
I know here in the USA so many teams take chances at trouble makers just to win. I don't know about soccer, but I have known a lot of troublemakers in soccer too. I still saw them playing soccer for a long time.There was no way he could stay at Movi short of groveling and begging for forgiveness. He's actually a bit fortunate to have landed back at Astana.
I don't think his behavior was ok. I just have a feeling that Movistar was trying to decrease his wage / cancel the contract anyway and used this issue to support their actions.So what should they have done? Just let it go that he acted like a diva and left the race, which is not only disrespectful to his teammates and staff, but also cost them prize money and UCI points? That would be a silly precedent then and end in total chaos.
And even if Unzue would have wanted to keep him in the roster, I'm pretty sure that some of his teammates would not have trusted him anymore and would not have been very keen to work for him again. This team already had a lot of internal issues in the last few years and I think they are wise to go on without López now and avoid any future conflicts in this matter.
Of course, it's sad and they will miss him performance-wise, as he seemed to be a pretty good fit and counterpart to Mas who races less aggressive. But I think they really had no other choice.
I don't think his behavior was ok. I just have a feeling that Movistar was trying to decrease his wage / cancel the contract anyway and used this issue to support their actions.
If course it's only my opinion.
Definitely, especially in the NFL. Domestic abuse? No problem!I know here in the USA so many teams take chances at trouble makers just to win. I don't know about soccer, but I have known a lot of troublemakers in soccer too. I still saw them playing soccer for a long time.