Randy rex said:
Who do you think would have been able to beat Landa in the mountains of last Giro among Gc riders who weren't present?
Difficult to say, but Quintana was always a little better than Landa when Landa was in good shape, in Avenir, in Madrid, but Landa is a rider that could have moments of inspiration that maybe any other rider has in the climbs. Froome is an stronger rider, in this Giro maybe in Mortirolo Landa is better, not in the other climbs. Mortirolo is a climb for pure climbers.
The problem for Froome and SKY is that with similar strenth, Contador is more inteligent, and how how to handle to his rivals and how to hide his weakness, and Landa has not the experience of Contador but he is clever as well.
I am not saying in Sky are stupids, but the same in the past lot of people was worried just of some things, SKy now is too worried for things of the trac, thinks that give you a little advantage that today counts, but a good strategy in an stage is more important as we saw that stage in that Tirreno that Nibali won.
I think froome and his team dont know what is the weakness of contador or other rivals, they know just: in this era this rider can do 400 watt in half an hour, so.. let it go, we will chat hinm later... that could be dangerpus, cyclings are not computer.. in that way I admire Contador, but I dont like that later he manage to sell that as i am the best, anyone, cant beat me, my victories relation is amazing,
I can be compared with anquetil and all that BS, when he has problems to beat people that Hinault will put 15 minutes far in a GC...
Sorry to mix things but everything is in relation.
So,
to sum up, I thin Quintana and Fropome can beat him in the climbs and maybe the Nibali of 2 years ago in the Giro, but for that must be bad weather. Pinot maybe sometimes, or Purito in some stages, but I think that in a climb as Mortirolo just Quintana could beat him.