Re: Re:
rm7 said:
Taxus4a said:
SeriousSam said:
I agree that Landa is the strongest climber on current evidence, but you must be smoking something extremely potent if you actually imply that Porte or Uran close to their best could have been 4 minutes quicker than Vasil in that time trial. I mean, what? 1994 Berzin, sure.
I didnt say that. I thougth I didnt need to explain better.
Landa was better than a thought, so he losed less time.
I
MO Uran and Porte at his best could have been put one minute to Contador, so more than 5 to Landa. (I thought could be 8, but I had my doubts becouse the ITT was hilly at the end, and Landa looked very strong)
We watched next day that they are not ok. Maybe Uran now is more recovered and he can try to get an stage, but it will be a fight between Astana and Contador, and there are people very strong as Hesjedal, Kruijwisk,...so very difficult.
That's really BS. Contador smashed that ITT like 2009 level, he would have beaten both Uran and Porte if they were at their best. I dont know with how much, but he was the by FAR the stronget guy that day. Kiriyenka who arguably are better than Uran and Porte in ITT only won by 14 seconds in a lot better wind conditions.
And some people here saying that Contador went full gas and Landa didn't? really? Of course Landa went full gas like Contador, he's just not a good TT rider.
I said that day Contador deserved that ITT, he was really strong, just the change wind avoid him to win the stage (for a little time).
But with the perspective that today, Porte and Uran are not in this Giro at his best, the crash afected his body, and Uran came from an ilness, so, it is diffucut to recover when is raining. the Rigo that could ITT well, is a Rigo that dont lose time in the mountains, at least he dont lose 10 minutes.
Rigo could have done 3 minutes better that ITT, and Porte of course better as well.
Kiriyenka, Van der Broeck, Luis Leon, Grebsch... are not a bad reference, but it should be better with Froome, Wiggo, Nibali, Tony Martin, without the problems of Uran and Porte, to evaluate how good that ITTwas for Contador.
Contador didnt put too much time on Aru, a climber that is not better than him on the mountains, or Kruiswijk, that is not an specialist to think that Uran and Porte couldnt beat that without his problems in this Giro.
To see Landa at the begining of the ITT help him as well, the same that the references were good.
Good for him.
An ITT at the second part of a race, after the mountains, long, with some climbs, show the strongest riders of the race... and Contador is one of the strongerst, and Uran and Porte no.
And I said 1 minute becouse Contador had a great day, other way I would say 2.
if you dont think the same is your respectable opinion
