Moderation

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jan 8, 2020
5,368
6,134
18,180
So now both @Logic-is-your-friend and @Extinction are banned as well. This is really getting kind of distracting to discussion.
I can only say that if a little devious irony is taken for trolling, without personal insult or mockery, but was completely pertinent to the discussion at hand, then we've moved from taking action to ensure a civil discussion to censorship and persecution. I think the mods folk here should do a little soul searching and be careful not to become thought police.
 
May 5, 2010
51,696
30,244
28,180
I've been reporting your posts for ages now. No luck so far :(

I'm actually quite surprised by that.
Pretty sure I have broken a few rules - there are just so many it's hard to keep track of - and as mentioned multiple times; some of the admins seem to use the "Rule was broken" = BAN method.
 
I don't want people to get banned for individual posts where they crossed a line without mean intent. I would want people banned for general trolling, people who are constantly and deliberately putting other members or riders down. But usually they take care to act within the rules by the letter in their specific posts, so reporting them makes no sense anyway. I have hardly reported anyone. In the beginning I did, but then I realized nothing would happen.
 
Interestingly the point is to report (or politely address) behavior, not people. That mental shift will help deciding what to report (or not) and generally leads to a better forum.

There is behaviour that is meant to bring others down, extremely condescending, disrespectful and provocative behaviour and things like pretending to just make statements about a general subject when it's actually an insult aimed at a certain poster (or rider), behaviour that will not be banned if I report it, because no outright insults with vulgar words were made - and this behaviour comes from the same posters again and again. I want to shy away from the overused word toxic, but I think it's very close to what toxic behaviour actually means.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,621
8,494
28,180
There is behaviour that is meant to bring others down, extremely condescending, disrespectful and provocative behaviour and things like pretending to just make statements about a general subject when it's actually an insult aimed at a certain poster (or rider), behaviour that will not be banned if I report it, because no outright insults with vulgar words were made - and this behaviour comes from the same posters again and again. I want to shy away from the overused word toxic, but I think it's very close to what toxic behaviour actually means.
I hear you, and that does occasionally occur, to be sure. But I think always good to check and see, even in those cases, if we're reacting to the poster or the behavior. I'm not perfect about this either, but "play the ball, not the man" should always be a gut check when replying to posts, or in cases where the behavior is totally out of bounds, reporting posts. More of a general comment than anything specifically about you. Cheers.
 
May 5, 2010
51,696
30,244
28,180
This is just getting silly though.

Yeah, but what can we do?
Apparently, they were getting pretty close to the edge of reason. Hence why I think it would be great if they could just get their own little corner to fight in.