Moderation

Page 20 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 5, 2010
51,691
30,240
28,180
Can't believe @Scarponi was banned for just commentating passionately.

I suppose the problem is that sometimes there can be a really fine line between "passionately" and "argumentative/trolling". Unfortunately, instead of just using common sense and assume it's the former, sometimes whoever's in charge goes straight for the bans...
 
  • Like
Reactions: the delgados
Apr 5, 2023
140
96
930
There was a mod that used to frequently say "mod hat on" and then discuss what was happening and describe what would happen if it didn't stop. That was effective most of the time. They are not longer a mod obviously.
Alpe dhuez? I remember him frequently doing it on the old politics topic when scott socal went crazy
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt
Apr 3, 2009
12,604
8,466
28,180
I got a notification a few minutes ago that my previous post was edited, for the reason: personal attack.
Though i do not agree with it being a personal attack (strongly stating you think someone is talking nonsense, is not a personal attack, imho) but this way of moderating should be the default "go to" in case mods/admins don't like to intervene in the actual discussion, imho. It is both clear which post is being edited, and for what reason. And if nothing else, it is reasonable.
"You're an idiot" is a personal attack.
"This post is idiotic" isn't. Not particularly nice, but I certainly can't say I've not said things like that, and recently.

Not saying you said either of these things, just an example. I guess it really depends on exactly how you strongly stated someone was talking nonsense.

Agree on your larger point, but that said, I don't have any reason to believe it's not actually the most common way the mods are dealing with things.
 
Feb 9, 2013
7,195
8,566
23,180
Just a minor thing I realized: when I, as a German, write "lol" it often means something like half a grin with a shrug - like "what can you say" and some other people use it in a similar way, while for others, especially native speakers it's an actual "laughing out loud" which might explain why such comments in general are perceived differently.
I think it should be understood that humor is the most difficult to translate, especially through writing. So for those of us who are multilingual and whose English is not the first language, some leeway should be allowed. (Please bare [or is it bear?] with us, in other words. ;))
 
Last edited:
Jan 8, 2020
5,365
6,128
18,180
I think it should be understood that humor is the most difficult to translate, especially through writing. So for those of us who are multilingual and whose English is not the first language, some leeway should be allowed. (Please bare [or is it bear?] with us, in other words. ;))
Bear in mind...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tricycle Rider
Oct 15, 2017
16,872
18,771
28,180
I think it should be understood that humor is the most difficult to translate, especially through writing. So for those of us who are multilingual and whose English is not the first language, some leeway should be allowed. (Please bare [or is it bear?] with us, in other words. ;))

Calling someone an "idiot" is pretty universal though :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tricycle Rider