- Jul 5, 2012
- 2,878
- 1
- 11,485
MarkvW said:Why not edit your offensive post, then?
because of this:
sittingbison said:...to demonstrate the depth of my anger...
MarkvW said:Why not edit your offensive post, then?
sittingbison said:...to demonstrate the depth of my anger...
sittingbison said:Different strokes for different blokes... We are not bots![]()
sittingbison said:because of this:
The Hitch said:Moondance got a week ban for quoting scarface after the gp Quebec in 2010, because the quotes contained the f word.
ebandit said:so if one gives it f**k (ed. yada yada) with feeling 'tis ok?
Mark L
ebandit said:so if one gives it f**k c**t w**n**r with feeling 'tis ok?
Mark L
patricknd said:so can I demonstrate the depths of my ****ing anger? **** house mouse!!!![]()
Zam_Olyas said:So reporting is mostly pointless?..netserk used to investigate despite all his faults.![]()
sittingbison said:ebandit you forgot bone idle lazy![]()
MarkvW said:Why not edit your offensive post, then?
ebandit said:so if one gives it f**k c**t w**n**r with feeling 'tis ok?
Mark L
patricknd said:so can I demonstrate the depths of my ****ing anger? **** house mouse!!!![]()
Afrank said:Sorry, but this is all rather childish. If SB wasn't a mod you all wouldn't have taken a second look at his use of the word ****. This is grasping at straws to find something to attack him for.
Further, I fail to see how the way in which he used it is offensive in any way. If you think it's offensive then IMHO you needs some thicker skin.
So let me get this straight. You never, in the last, say, 2 years, never saw a normal user writing a bad word and getting away with it? Because if you mean that, then I'm rather impressed by the fact that evidently only I saw them.MarkvW said:If it doesn't mean that, Eshnar, then it means that mods can say shit, but other forum members can't say shit.
Now, that's bullshit. And I'm expressing the depth of my anger.
Eshnar said:So let me get this straight. You never, in the last, say, 2 years, never saw a normal user writing a bad word and getting away with it? Because if you mean that, then I'm rather impressed by the fact that evidently only I saw them.
There was indeed a rule about "avoiding foul language, and not circumventing the censors in order to do so" which is obviously what you're quoting, but that rule was just a relic from the past. Since I'm a mod, that is 18 months roughly, we never enforced that. And by never I mean only once Hiero2 did (he gave an infraction), and after a discussion in the mods room we overturned that. And that rule is not even in the current rules, btw.
Huh? What did Afrank say?MarkvW said:I'm getting one vibe from you and Sitting Bison, and I'm getting a different one from Afrank.
Eshnar said:Huh? What did Afrank say?![]()
You're welcomeMarkvW said:Oh. Sorry. I reread his post. I think you are all being consistent. I guess use of vulgarity is now acceptable in this forum if it is not done in an "offensive" way.
I can live within those rules.
We're cool.
MarkvW said:... I guess use of vulgarity is now acceptable in this forum if it is not done in an "offensive" way.
I can live within those rules.
We're cool.
MarkvW said:Well, SHIT! It's good to know that shit is now legit!
sittingbison said:no, its not legit now
MarkvW said:He violated the rules in two ways: (1) he used a vulgar word, (2) he circumvented the censoring software of this forum to do it.
Sitting Bison has stated that it is acceptable to use the word "shit" to "demonstrate the depth" of his anger. That means we all can use vulgarity (and circumvent the censoring software to do it), when we feel a need to demonstrate the depth of our anger.
If it doesn't mean that, Eshnar, then it means that mods can say shit, but other forum members can't say shit.
Now, that's bullshit. And I'm expressing the depth of my anger.
Eshnar said:So let me get this straight. You never, in the last, say, 2 years, never saw a normal user writing a bad word and getting away with it? Because if you mean that, then I'm rather impressed by the fact that evidently only I saw them.
There was indeed a rule about "avoiding foul language, and not circumventing the censors in order to do so" which is obviously what you're quoting, but that rule was just a relic from the past. Since I'm a mod, that is 18 months roughly, we never enforced that. And by never I mean only once Hiero2 did (he gave an infraction), and after a discussion in the mods room we overturned that. And that rule is not even in the current rules, btw.
Eshnar said:You're welcome
sittingbison said:...
I don't have to put up with shit like that, if any of you want to play that card there is only going to be one result....
MarkvW said:Are you a transparent hypocrite, or what? Can you NOT see the double standard you are postulating? Why don't you just do the decent thing and delete the vulgar word from your post? The rules ought to apply equally to everyone, shouldn't they?
MarkvW said:Are you a transparent hypocrite, or what?
Hope you do remember the episode. By "we overturned it" I meant we. You included.hiero2 said:WHAT!?!? You overturned one of my decisions? I am appalled! I am incensed, aggravated, irritated, ANGERED! FEAR MY ANGER OH YOU MERE MORTALS . . .
Ok - now off the ghostbusters second play - I'm not really upset. But I did find it humorous!
Esh - all - read my post about what is in the lexicon carefully. I would strongly recommend you regard it as a guideline to the border between acceptable and not-acceptable. Of course, if the mod room mutually decides to modify the details, behind my back (!)no problem. I won't sweat it. I might give you a hard time, tho, given the chance.
Eshnar said:Hope you do remember the episode. By "we overturned it" I meant we. You included.
At most you can say I opened the topic "Hiero2 doesn't remember a pretty insignificant episode". You can discuss this if you find it interesting.MarkvW said:Is this topic over, as per mod Sitting Bison's edict, or has it been reopened, per mod Eshnar?
