Moderators

Page 302 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 25, 2013
1,442
0
0
sittingbison said:
I banned butterhead. And have posted the reason in the suspension thread. Sorry it took me an hour, I had to do some work at work.

I also deleted all his posts because of his attitude and comments towards me...he brought this and removal of his CN "persona" on his own (butter)head through his vile obnoxious comments and attitude in PM exchange.

I don't have to put up with shit like that, if any of you want to play that card there is only going to be one result.

EDIT: looking back at my inbox I have noticed (s)he did the same thing a couple of weeks ago. I can remember at the time being really annoyed but said what the hey and I let it slide

I think you should look beyond the effect of those posts on you and whether or not what he has posted in the threads substantiates a banning.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
darwin553 said:
I think you should look beyond the effect of those posts on you and whether or not what he has posted in the threads substantiates a banning.
no he shouldn't. The rules are in place everywhere in the forum, not just in the threads, but also in the PMs, in the visitor messages and so on.
The **** s/he wrote was not acceptable, no matter where s/he wrote it.
 
Sep 9, 2012
5,278
2,492
20,680
I think if you take the insults to the PM's it shows you're taking this **** here way too serious. It's a forum about bloody bike racing after all.
 
Jun 25, 2013
1,442
0
0
One other thing I don't understand bison is you go around accusing him of using 'vile' language then you yourself use vulgar language describing the emotions you felt... :rolleyes:

Eshnar said:
no he shouldn't. The rules are in place everywhere in the forum, not just in the threads, but also in the PMs, in the visitor messages and so on.
The **** s/he wrote was not acceptable, no matter where s/he wrote it.

I understand that. But, there should be a greater tolerance to inappropriate language in PMs as they don't, if kept private, offend the masses which is the higher interest to protect but only the individual mod if indeed the mod is offended to begin with. This isn't saying that where it is clearly highly distasteful language used that any reasonable person would find offensive it isn't worthy of a penalty. It just allows for greater discretion to apply a punishment I suppose. And as these PMs are likely to remain concealed, I guess we will never know what actual words were used...
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
I've had disagreements with Del and king... And we are all still here. I don't recall being rude to either, could be wrong though - we live and learn

Put it this way. butterhead is a sockpuppet of xrayvision.... Who was a sockpuppet of fidolix ....

butterhead wasn't banninated as a sockpuppet, there is a trend though.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,186
29,831
28,180
sittingbison said:
I've had disagreements with Del and king... And we are all still here. I don't recall being rude to either, could be wrong though - we live and learn

Put it this way. butterhead is a sockpuppet of xrayvision.... Who was a sockpuppet of fidolix ....

butterhead wasn't banninated as a sockpuppet, there is a trend though.

If you know this, then why wasn't he banned before? It's not like I haven't reported him before writing that he probably was xrayvision...
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
I've done the hard yards now (s)he has piqued my interest. And I can't recall your reports.... Might have been when I was having a weekend gliding instead of reading the Forum ;)

send me an email or tweet if you're serious
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
I've done the hard yards now (s)he has piqued my interest. And I can't recall your reports.... Might have been when I was having a weekend gliding instead of reading the Forum ;)

Send me a pm or tweet if you are serious :)
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
sittingbison said:
I've done the hard yards now (s)he has piqued my interest. And I can't recall your reports.... Might have been when I was having a weekend gliding instead of reading the Forum ;)

send me an email or tweet if you're serious

Even if you werent there, strange that other mods didn't do the easy digging.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
sittingbison said:
I banned butterhead. And have posted the reason in the suspension thread. Sorry it took me an hour, I had to do some work at work.

I also deleted all his posts because of his attitude and comments towards me...he brought this and removal of his CN "persona" on his own (butter)head through his vile obnoxious comments and attitude in PM exchange.

I don't have to put up with shit like that, if any of you want to play that card there is only going to be one result.

EDIT: looking back at my inbox I have noticed (s)he did the same thing a couple of weeks ago. I can remember at the time being really annoyed but said what the hey and I let it slide

Are you purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate that the rules don't apply to you?
 
Feb 23, 2014
8,827
254
17,880
MarkvW said:
Are you purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate that the rules don't apply to you?

Do you really expect mods to perfectly hold the standard they enforce? :rolleyes:
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
MarkvW said:
Are you purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate that the rules don't apply to you?
As if we ever banned anyone for writing sh!t.

If you understood that butterhead was banned for using bad words, you're on the wrong track. totally.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Eshnar said:
As if we ever banned anyone for writing sh!t.

If you understood that butterhead was banned for using bad words, you're on the wrong track. totally.

Well, SHIT! It's good to know that shit is now legit!
 
Oct 6, 2009
5,270
2
0
The Froome thread is already eleventy-billion pages long. An off-topic conversation about Indurain's development gets going (with help from a moderator, no less), and a poster quite reasonably says

autologous said:
WTF. take the mig discussion somewhere other than the Froome thread.

And the off-topic long posts on how Mig was only mediocre continue.

So I'll place my request here:

Can a mod please move the Mig development stuff to its own thread? Or start a new thread if the point is to compare Froome to Mig?
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
sittingbison said:
I've had disagreements with Del and king... And we are all still here. I don't recall being rude to either, could be wrong though - we live and learn

Put it this way. butterhead is a sockpuppet of xrayvision.... Who was a sockpuppet of fidolix ....

butterhead wasn't banninated as a sockpuppet, there is a trend though.

When I was looking at xrayvision's posts and though of the bans for insulting via PM, I thought - maybe they're all sockpuppets of Fidolix? Turns out I was right :)
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,186
29,831
28,180
LaFlorecita said:
When I was looking at xrayvision's posts and though of the bans for insulting via PM, I thought - maybe they're all sockpuppets of Fidolix? Turns out I was right :)
Just goes to show the sockpuppet speculation thread should be reopened.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Eshnar said:
As if we ever banned anyone for writing sh!t.

Moondance got a week ban for quoting scarface after the gp Quebec in 2010, because the quotes contained the f word.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
The Hitch said:
Moondance got a week ban for quoting scarface after the gp Quebec in 2010, because the quotes contained the f word.
yeah. It was 2010. Different age. I wasn't even there.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
Beech Mtn said:
Can a mod please move the Mig development stuff to its own thread? Or start a new thread if the point is to compare Froome to Mig?
posts moved.
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
MarkvW said:
Are you purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate that the rules don't apply to you?

no, I was purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate the depth of my anger. Hopefully I've written enough even mannered and tempered posts that members realise this

Jspear said:
Do you really expect mods to perfectly hold the standard they enforce? :rolleyes:

mods usually hold the standard they enforce...indeed they could be considered to BE the standard. However, mods, just like members, are not perfect.

MarkvW said:
Well, SHIT! It's good to know that shit is now legit!

no, its not legit now. see above
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
sittingbison said:
no, I was purposely using vulgarity to demonstrate the depth of my anger. Hopefully I've written enough even mannered and tempered posts that members realise this



mods usually hold the standard they enforce...indeed they could be considered to BE the standard. However, mods, just like members, are not perfect.



no, its not legit now. see above


Why not edit your offensive post, then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.