Mikel Astarloza and Ezequiel Mosquera for sentimental reasons.
A big one for me was Patrik Sinkewitz, the second time. Hitch has questioned me on it a few times as I raised the topic a lot a few years ago, but I had a lot of time for Patrik; meeting him when he made his comeback from his 2007 suspension was a bit of a lightbulb moment for me. People who doped weren't sinister, shady people cooking up dastardly plots and sneaking around under cover of night like a stereotypical villain; sure some of them were two-dimensional villains, like Riccò, or power-hungry megalomaniacs like Armstrong, but the majority of them were just regular guys doing regular things, and doping was something that, for many, came with the job, much as we'd rather it didn't. Sinky returned with PSK Whirlpool but couldn't get a team for 2010, instead riding the entire route of the Frankfurt Maitagrennen for German TV to analyse the course and to effectively advertise his dedication. ISD (later Farnese Vini) signed him mid-season and he got good results in the Volta a Portugal, Tour of Britain and Italy's catalogue of autumn one-day races. Given how he'd been publicly slammed by many people in a way most dopers weren't (that was probably because he talked. At that point we had three dopers in short order - Sinkewitz, Sella and Frei - who were very candid about what they'd done, with who and so on, in a way that we really haven't with anybody that has been caught since) and his comeback restricted in a way that many other dopers weren't, I felt that it was good that he was getting a chance of redemption that had previously been denied him while hypocritical white knights like David Millar, or less contrite and helpful dopers like half the Italian ProConti scene, were not ostracized the same way.
And then he tested positive again.