I Love To Dope said:Innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean sit there amd think up ways evidence is false.
staubsauger said:Unai Osa?
Once a Giro podium. Not much afterwards. One hit wonder produced by Fuentes!?
This. Followed by one year of Gilbert and the Sky transformations.Archibald said:(...), and probably the last 5 years of Valverde's continuous clean riding improvements over his former doped period...
doolols said:And this is all assuming that the "leaked numbers" were correct, and real, and not just made up by someone with an agenda.
RownhamHill said:doolols said:And this is all assuming that the "leaked numbers" were correct, and real, and not just made up by someone with an agenda.
I thought Froome alluded to the numbers on the video being real at some point of the TdF? I thought when he was talking about releasing data he said that some of his numbers were already out there and everyone had seen them, or some such. Sorry, can't be more specific than that as I wasn't paying too much attention, but I think it's acknowledged that the numbers are real.
thehog said:RownhamHill said:doolols said:And this is all assuming that the "leaked numbers" were correct, and real, and not just made up by someone with an agenda.
I thought Froome alluded to the numbers on the video being real at some point of the TdF? I thought when he was talking about releasing data he said that some of his numbers were already out there and everyone had seen them, or some such. Sorry, can't be more specific than that as I wasn't paying too much attention, but I think it's acknowledged that the numbers are real.
Considering Brailsford said it was a ‘data hack’ he basically confirmed the numbers were real.
with Froome at Planche des belles filles, agreed.Digger said:froome ventoux
Gregga said:with Froome at Planche des belles filles, agreed.Digger said:froome ventoux
roundabout said:Gregga said:with Froome at Planche des belles filles, agreed.Digger said:froome ventoux
Eh, he couldn't even drop Taaramäe until the final corner.
I think you're conflating suspicious with surprising. Armstrong's 2004 Alpe TT wasn't surprising in the least, but very suspicious.PremierAndrew said:Surprised people are saying Froome's 2013 Tour was more suspicious than his 2011 Vuelta.
A dominant performance in a 3 week stage race by a rider who had finished runner up the previous year (and was the strongest), as well as being the dominant rider of stage races leading up to that as well. More suspicious than a performance out of nowhere by a rider who had no contract for the following season and had shown nothing in his career to warrant one before suddenly finishing runner up despite being a dom for half the race?
PremierAndrew said:Surprised people are saying Froome's 2013 Tour was more suspicious than his 2011 Vuelta.
A dominant performance in a 3 week stage race by a rider who had finished runner up the previous year (and was the strongest), as well as being the dominant rider of stage races leading up to that as well. More suspicious than a performance out of nowhere by a rider who had no contract for the following season and had shown nothing in his career to warrant one before suddenly finishing runner up despite being a dom for half the race?
Front runner for Post Of The Year.Big Doopie said:*Deleted*
oldcrank said:Front runner for Post Of The Year.Big Doopie said:*deleted*
Nice to read someone who wasn't
fooled by Phil Ligget's ''dancing on
his pedals.''