The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Trev_S said:I agree ray j willings,
prior to stage 17 Quitana was -3:10 Valverde -4:02 & Contador -4:23 down
Contador's long range attack was perfect for Moviestar. All they had to do was wait until Froome felt a greater threat from Contador's move. Sooner or later Froome & Sky would react, they aren't going to risk letting Contador gain sufficient time.
So Moviestart wait, Sky react and burn off their riders in chase and isolating Froome (if Froome doesn't have to respond himself by then anyway). If/when Froome draws Contador back it opens up the door for Valverde &/or Quintana to then attack. They also need a lot of time & if they want to win the Tour then they have to chance their current position by gambling on allowing Contador free reign when he attacks.
Put Froome & Sky under pressure early enough on the mountains.
They aren't going to beat Froome they way they are currently racing.
Like the superior rider Contador looked to be during the Giro until he cracked and then Astana regretted not trying before?SeriousSam said:Consolidated 2nd and 3rd, great result. Quintana just needs to go on and win Alpe d'huez now. The best reasonably achievable result against a superior rider in Chris Froome.
The only thing he was going to achieve with those late attacks was to appease his conscience by enabling him to say he tried, even though it's hogwash. He can't put enough time on Froome like that. In my book, it doesn't count as trying if what you did could never have been expected to succeed.Broccolidwarf said:Can't really fault Quintana today, he tried several times.
hrotha said:The only thing he was going to achieve with those late attacks was to appease his conscience by enabling him to say he tried, even though it's hogwash. He can't put enough time on Froome like that. In my book, it doesn't count as trying if what you did could never have been expected to succeed.Broccolidwarf said:Can't really fault Quintana today, he tried several times.
He made one tactically astute attack on Allos, but that was entirely too close to the summit, too short, and lacking too much conviction.
Your right it probably wouldn't have worked, not for Contador, but non the less Froome wouldn't want a rider like Contador back in the picture where seconds count. He & what team mates were left would have chased. Don't forget Tinkoff also had riders ahead up the road as well which would have been a concern for Froome and he only had one team mate with him at the time, even though there were 2 up the road they'd have to wait just as Tinkoff would be doing.wwabbit said:Trev_S said:I agree ray j willings,
prior to stage 17 Quitana was -3:10 Valverde -4:02 & Contador -4:23 down
Contador's long range attack was perfect for Moviestar. All they had to do was wait until Froome felt a greater threat from Contador's move. Sooner or later Froome & Sky would react, they aren't going to risk letting Contador gain sufficient time.
So Moviestart wait, Sky react and burn off their riders in chase and isolating Froome (if Froome doesn't have to respond himself by then anyway). If/when Froome draws Contador back it opens up the door for Valverde &/or Quintana to then attack. They also need a lot of time & if they want to win the Tour then they have to chance their current position by gambling on allowing Contador free reign when he attacks.
Put Froome & Sky under pressure early enough on the mountains.
They aren't going to beat Froome they way they are currently racing.
That's not going to work. Sky would allow the gap to Contador to go out to 4 mins by Allos, and they can do that without expending much energy. At which point, Contador would either be going up Allos alone if he had used his teammates to bring him to Allos, or he would be fatigued by the time he reached Allos and will lose a couple of minutes on the climb. Sky only has to continue riding a strong steady tempo, and even if they lose riders on the Allos climb, they still had Porte and Roche ahead - excellent move putting them in the break. So probably at best Contador will gain 2 minutes on the GC, and that suits Froome just fine.
And of course, Movistar can't allow that to happen because that that would put Contador up ahead of Quintana and Valverde, so they did the right thing in closing down that move.
Carl0880 said:My guess is if they see Froome's team in trouble or Froome himself in trouble early in the stage then they will go out for the assault on the yellow.
[...]
mr. tibbs said:Carl0880 said:My guess is if they see Froome's team in trouble or Froome himself in trouble early in the stage then they will go out for the assault on the yellow.
[...]
Welp, we can pretty much count on THAT not happening--especially since Movistar hasn't shown any interest in testing Sky until the finale of each stage, if even then.
Podium spots for everyone!
EDIT: This speaks to why guys like Valverde and Hincapie languish without getting the wins they could have: they wait and see. They look, they check things out, they test the waters, they wait for the race to happen and then react. And the guys who make the race happen--instead of waiting--win.
For Valverde, just look at last year's Lombardia. Or Gerrans and the WC. Or Hincapie and any edition of Paris-Roubaix that he didn't crash out of. They all lost these races to guys who risked blowing up to get the win, while they themselves rode conservatively (or smart or tactically or whatever pacifying euphemism you prefer) and gained yet more podium or top-five finishes instead.
That's essentially what Movistar and Quintana are doing at the Tour. If Quintana wants to break Froome with an attack, he has to risk breaking himself, first. But that would risk him losing a couple of minutes and the podium spot, so podium places it is.
bala v said:mr. tibbs said:Carl0880 said:My guess is if they see Froome's team in trouble or Froome himself in trouble early in the stage then they will go out for the assault on the yellow.
[...]
Welp, we can pretty much count on THAT not happening--especially since Movistar hasn't shown any interest in testing Sky until the finale of each stage, if even then.
Podium spots for everyone!
EDIT: This speaks to why guys like Valverde and Hincapie languish without getting the wins they could have [...]
Pretty strange statement for a guy who won nearly 100 races in his career
BigMac said:Sky looks weak. But they want 2nd and 3rd too much.
Actually it's 30%. And 50% if Valverde attacks from far. Also there is 99% chance Valverde will be out of the podium by Sunday.IndianCyclist said:Too much to lose with 2% chance of winning. So 2 &3 is ok
cineteq said:Actually it's 30%. And 50% if Valverde attacks from far. Also there is 99% chance Valverde will be out of the podium by Sunday.IndianCyclist said:Too much to lose with 2% chance of winning. So 2 &3 is ok
Trev_S said:Your right it probably wouldn't have worked, not for Contador, but non the less Froome wouldn't want a rider like Contador back in the picture where seconds count. He & what team mates were left would have chased. Don't forget Tinkoff also had riders ahead up the road as well which would have been a concern for Froome and he only had one team mate with him at the time, even though there were 2 up the road they'd have to wait just as Tinkoff would be doing.
ILovecycling said:From those videos interview I have seen this Tour, Unzue as a DS of such a good GC team is a massive disgrace.To put it mildly.