Teams & Riders Nairo Quintana discussion thread

Page 111 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re: Re:

Arredondo said:
Mr.White said:
Afrank said:
portugal11 said:
he won't win another gt until contador retire. froome beat him without time trials so he won't win le tour until froome past his best

Not necessarily. He's showed he can match or beat Froome before. With a little more courage and not being hampered down by Movistar's podium goals, he can beat him.

Could you point me where was exactly the case when he suffered because of Movistar tactics?

La Toussuire

How?
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
Re: Re:

Arredondo said:
Mr.White said:
Afrank said:
portugal11 said:
he won't win another gt until contador retire. froome beat him without time trials so he won't win le tour until froome past his best

Not necessarily. He's showed he can match or beat Froome before. With a little more courage and not being hampered down by Movistar's podium goals, he can beat him.

Could you point me where was exactly the case when he suffered because of Movistar tactics?

La Toussuire

Trust me, he could attack whenever he wanted to. To blame that on Valv is not right.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Arredondo said:
Mr.White said:
Afrank said:
portugal11 said:
he won't win another gt until contador retire. froome beat him without time trials so he won't win le tour until froome past his best

Not necessarily. He's showed he can match or beat Froome before. With a little more courage and not being hampered down by Movistar's podium goals, he can beat him.

Could you point me where was exactly the case when he suffered because of Movistar tactics?

La Toussuire

Trust me, he could attack whenever he wanted to. To blame that on Valv is not right.

There's no evidence for that too. Could be, but we just don't know.

Still i think a teammate who's also is hunting for podium, is not ideal if you want to win the Tour. But from Bala's point of view, it's totally logical and fair.
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Arredondo said:
Mr.White said:
Afrank said:
portugal11 said:
he won't win another gt until contador retire. froome beat him without time trials so he won't win le tour until froome past his best

Not necessarily. He's showed he can match or beat Froome before. With a little more courage and not being hampered down by Movistar's podium goals, he can beat him.

Could you point me where was exactly the case when he suffered because of Movistar tactics?

La Toussuire

Trust me, he could attack whenever he wanted to. To blame that on Valv is not right.

Exactly! He attacked precisely where he wanted according to him, so there's no blame for anyone but him
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,820
9,810
28,180
Re:

portugal11 said:
he won't win another gt until contador retire. froome beat him without time trials so he won't win le tour until froome past his best
Because obviously things can't change :rolleyes:
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
Re: Re:

Which is the more likely? Valverde felt well that day and his only worry was Nibali, who was up front, so you could even argue that it was en Valverde's interest to force the pace a bit form longer way out. Valverde is being blamed all too much for Nairo not jumping more early and more often which simply isnt true. After stage 17 (TJ eliminated, Contador more or less eliminated from podium), Valverde didnt have that much to worry about and even if he had, I don't want to believe than Valverde/Unzue would hold Quintana back if he said 'hey, im going to go early and put a few minutes into Froome'. They just wouldnt. Valverde had everything fairly under control from that point on

Either way, its okay to speculate that, but to state that's how it was (which was very common - journalists, experts, twitter, forums, commentators etc.) is just not right. Give the man a break, even if he isnt totally likeable to many
 
Jun 24, 2013
3,548
1,079
16,680
Valverde only held him back on Glandon when Contador attacked you could see Nairo reacting but Valverde told him don't. But that was when Thomas was still there for Froome so would've been unsuccesfull anyway
 
Jun 29, 2015
173
0
0
Re:

Billie said:
Valverde only held him back on Glandon when Contador attacked you could see Nairo reacting but Valverde told him don't. But that was when Thomas was still there for Froome so would've been unsuccesfull anyway

wasnt he dropped as early as chaussy?
also it looked like strong headwinds in glandon so you would rather stay in the group. i think nairo did his maximum possible. one factor froome not loosing the tour were the 2 truncated, girodonne mountain stages :mad: .
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,936
44,324
28,180
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Re:

Red Rick said:
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there
It was not the right thing to do for Quintana. Probably OK for Nibali, but not for Quintana.

Having said that, after reviewing all the mountain stages and realistically taking into account the strength of Sky, Froome's strength, descents, Quintana's strength, I actually believe that this was the stage where he lost the Tour. I don't thing he would have been successful in the other stages for the things I mentioned. He should have gone early at the bottom of La Toussuire . The numbers show that he could have gone early and he could have sustained it for longer time.
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,820
9,810
28,180
I am happy that he didnt go with nibali on the CdF but I think if he had done so he would have won the tour. (At least if Nibali had worked with him and even if he hadn't done so, Nairo at least would have won the stage because there wouldnt have been any other riders up in front, besides rolland who was just too weak to stay in front, that day)
 
Aug 12, 2012
6,996
1,011
20,680
Re:

Red Rick said:
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there

Froome had a mechabical, it i not from a champoion to win a Tour this way.

The place wanst there, Nibali didnt mind Froome.

Quintana attacked the only place he could drop Froome.
 
May 30, 2015
2,760
53
11,580
the thing is froome could respond if quintana had joined nibali in that move or close the gap on the descent at least. inspite of the mechanical, he was able to accelerate on the summit of croix de fer yet, unlike toussuire.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,936
44,324
28,180
Oh, let's not forget he waited till very late on la Toussuire to attack, they rode with the same group the whole time, he could've attacked 8-10km earlier, which is what he would've done if he had waited for Froome for fair play reasons. That tells me it was more a matter of being too afraid to attack than to 'wait'.

Let's agree he's a champion, a single GT champion who's never won the Tour
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
He should of attacked on CdF, with Nibali or without him, but he didn't. Also should of attacked on Toussuire earlier, but he didn't. The blame is on him
 
Jan 25, 2010
264
0
0
Gigs_98 said:
I am happy that he didnt go with nibali on the CdF but I think if he had done so he would have won the tour. (At least if Nibali had worked with him and even if he hadn't done so, Nairo at least would have won the stage because there wouldnt have been any other riders up in front, besides rolland who was just too weak to stay in front, that day)

Coulda, woulda, shoulda!

That doesn't count. Excuses.
 
Aug 9, 2009
505
0
0
Re: Re:

Taxus4a said:
Red Rick said:
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there

Froome had a mechabical, it i not from a champoion to win a Tour this way.

The place wanst there, Nibali didnt mind Froome.

Quintana attacked the only place he could drop Froome.
That's so lame. Having mechanicals is part of racing. If people can't deal with being attacked when *** happens then they should move over and stop wasting space.
 
Jul 12, 2012
8,975
591
19,080
Re: Re:

SergeDeM said:
Taxus4a said:
Red Rick said:
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there

Froome had a mechabical, it i not from a champoion to win a Tour this way.

The place wanst there, Nibali didnt mind Froome.

Quintana attacked the only place he could drop Froome.
That's so lame. Having mechanicals is part of racing. If people can't deal with being attacked when **** happens then they should move over and stop wasting space.

The day cyclists lower themselves to the gutter by attacking a race leader when he has a mechanical is the day this sport pushes a lot of fans to turn off for good. (that's any race leader, not just Froome).
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Re: Re:

Pricey_sky said:
SergeDeM said:
Taxus4a said:
Red Rick said:
Quintana could've gone with Nibali over the CdF. The way he roasted Froome on the easiest 5km of a powerclimb should show you he was better, Nibali would've cooperated, and Quintana would've gained wayy more time then and there

Froome had a mechabical, it i not from a champoion to win a Tour this way.

The place wanst there, Nibali didnt mind Froome.

Quintana attacked the only place he could drop Froome.
That's so lame. Having mechanicals is part of racing. If people can't deal with being attacked when **** happens then they should move over and stop wasting space.

The day cyclists lower themselves to the gutter by attacking a race leader when he has a mechanical is the day this sport pushes a lot of fans to turn off for good. (that's any race leader, not just Froome).
lol. what kind of bull**** you never watched cycling before this century that's for sure
 
Jul 12, 2012
8,975
591
19,080
Re: Re:

Ryo Hazuki said:
[
lol. what kind of bull**** you never watched cycling before this century that's for sure

Ok a bit over the top, but its it's still something which you don't do.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Re: Re:

Pricey_sky said:
Ryo Hazuki said:
[
lol. what kind of bull**** you never watched cycling before this century that's for sure

Ok a bit over the top, but its it's still something which you don't do.
why not? it's all part of cycling and competition. what happens next? when a rider feels ill you don't attack anymore?
 
Jun 24, 2013
3,548
1,079
16,680
it happens all the time. like Roche and Delgado ganging up on Bernard who was behind because of flat. They attacked and rest of the peloton closed up the road on a bridge. Roche actually did it twice that year, also in the Giro. The italian team leader of Roche was in pink when he flatted, Roche was ordered to fall back but instead attacked. Or not so long ago Contador and Andy on Bales.

Also i've never understood the 'don't attack the race leader when he has a mechanical". Why would it be any different for the race leader then nr 189 in classification.
 
Jun 10, 2013
9,240
5
17,495
Re: Re:

Ryo Hazuki said:
Pricey_sky said:
Ryo Hazuki said:
[
lol. what kind of bull**** you never watched cycling before this century that's for sure

Ok a bit over the top, but its it's still something which you don't do.
why not? it's all part of cycling and competition. what happens next? when a rider feels ill you don't attack anymore?

Nonsensical hyperbole is nonsensical. Nobody suggested that.
 

TRENDING THREADS