The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Maybe its because Chip has said that he would like to work with Kaep? Chip made his name by having option QBs who could stack up as many yards as the RBs and still throw a good ball too. Kaep was successful because he was part of the SF run threat plus he could toss a few good balls from the pocket and even more out of it. Its important to point out that you left Vick out which is what Chip really wanted, but MV is past his prime.Billie said:Never understood this whole Kaep will play for Chip Kelly next season. It's superficiel analysis that doesn't go further than Kaep is a running QB, Chip once had a running QB.
Look at the QB's Chip brought in: Barkley, Sanchize, Bradford. Not running QB's at all.
And looking at it from Kaepernicks perspective: he was succesfull in San Fran in a slow grind it out power running scheme that lined up and ran it down the opponents throat. Exactly the opposite of what the Eagles do.
RE: P. Manning: This isn't the way he dreamed about ending his career for sure. Its tough for him and his fans. What happens next depends on his injury, and how well Os plays. Peyton may not be able to play so no discussion. Peyton is able to play (@80%), but Os is playing great so stay with Os. Peyton is able to play (@80%), and Os is struggling so Peyton is back in. Peyton, and Os can't play so Ponder leads the team to a SB victory (sorry, I had to toss that one in there.Merckx index said:It's looking more and more like the only question about Kelly is, will he take the USC job or go to LSU? I don't know if he will be fired after this season--I really think you have to give him more than one year with roster control--but he may decide to leave on his own. It would be a good time in the sense of the HC opportunities available at the college level right now.
Is it possible that Manning has played his last down? He probably won't be healthy until near the end of the season. If Osweiller, who appears more comfortable in Kubiak's offense, performs reasonably well, are they going to change things just before the postseason? At this point, there is a very realistic possibility that Denver plays NE in the championship game (they almost definitely will not play them any sooner in the postseason). This would be I think the fourth time Brady and Manning have met in that situation. Imagine if Manning has to watch the game from the bench. Then imagine if Denver wins, and goes on to win the SB with Manning on the bench. How hard would that be to take? He gets his second SB ring, but it doesn't really count. Would he really get much more pleasure from that than from playing and losing again?
Or maybe he comes in late in the game in a losing cause, a la Unitas in SB3. No matter how you look at it, it's hard to see Manning finishing his career in anything but disappointing fashion.
Anyone think Carolina isn't for real? They picked off Romo three times, two for TDs. Then Romo went down with another injury. Looks like the Giants have a pretty easy path to the division win, unless Amster's team can somehow pull it off.
The Panthers have two games vs. Atlanta left, plus TB, NO, and the Giants. Only Atlanta has a winning record, and right now they may be the poorest team of that bunch.
The threat to run is of some value because it will likely hold a LB. The big value is less that they might run for 100 yards, but more that they scramble well/extend plays (just stepping up in the pocket doesn't count). You already gave the best two examples of that in the NFL: Cam Newton and Russell Wilson. If Drew Brees wasn't mobile, we would have never heard of him. The reason a pure running QB doesn't do as well in the NFL as in the NCAA is because there are at least six guys on the other side of the ball who are just as fast in the NFL instead of one or two in the NCAA.Alpe d'Huez said:The interesting thing about that is that McFadden is more of a run between the tackles RB, but they don't really use him that way. Also, Bradford is anything but a running QB. He's a quick read QB. One of the knocks on Kaep is that he doesn't go through progressions well. The anti-Brady (or anti-Bradford) if you will. So both he, and somewhat Chip would have to adapt if he went there. Plus, Chip has said he likes to have two QBs capable of starting. Presuming he keeps Bradford, and Sam had finally been playing well until hurt, Kaep isn't the same kind of QB, even if he's a better athlete than Sanchez.
I have to say I've never really bought into the running QB in the NFL. They all seem to have electric moments, but never last playing that way. The best "running" QBs in recent times have been Newton, who has done far more damage with his arm, and Wilson, who doesn't run as much as he keep plays alive. The whole idea that the read-option was nearly impossible to defend has been mostly proven wrong, and the QBs that tried it most the last few years (and used the QB run as part of the option), RG3 and Kaep have fallen quite far. I always thought RG3 could make it big in the NFL though because he does have a strong arm and did show deep field and outside accuracy, but once his knee blew out, and he needed to adapt into a Romo-like QB who could use his legs to not run but just keep plays alive, he never seemed to adapt, and I think ego has something to do with that. As to Kaep, it's hard to say what he thinks, if he thinks he can still run, or because he has a very strong arm he can throw anywhere. But obviously both are untrue, at least for right now. Is Chip Kelly the guy who can change that? Turn him into the next Big Ben, who uses his size and feet to keep plays alive? I honestly don't know.
Billie said:Never understood this whole Kaep will play for Chip Kelly next season. It's superficiel analysis.
Amsterhammer said:Forgot games start early...
PHI @ DET
CAR @ DAL
CHI @ GB
I agree with Billie. Problem is, the pundits don't know the game well enough and are driven by pressure to produce, and so come up with all sorts of stirring-the-pot crap.The Hitch said:Billie said:Never understood this whole Kaep will play for Chip Kelly next season. It's superficiel analysis.
Is there any other type of analysis in sport?
on3m@n@rmy said:I agree with Billie. Problem is, the pundits don't know the game well enough and are driven by pressure to produce, and so come up with all sorts of stirring-the-pot crap.The Hitch said:Billie said:Never understood this whole Kaep will play for Chip Kelly next season. It's superficiel analysis.
Is there any other type of analysis in sport?
The other type of analysis that's more intriguing is game-play analysis. Here's a good example of that type from the last NFL game that I paid attention to (Cincy @ Ariz): 1st quarter, no scores, CIN has the ball 3rd and goal at the Ariz 3, Ariz lines up TE Eifert strong right, Dalton (alias Red Ryder BB gun) starts calling signals and in the middle of that Eifert splits out wide right. No other WRs on right side. Ariz splits the CB out over Eifert. At that moment Cincy had created a mismatch of Eifert against one-on-one coverage with the CB... advantage Cincy. Eifert's out route to the right pylon and a dart by Dalton (also alias Red Rocket) resulted in TD Cincy. That was a great play call by Cincy. We often hear about this kind of analysis, but don't get to read that kind of analysis nearly as often.
on3m@n@rmy said:Spectacular catch for TD by Odell Beckham, NYG make valiant come from behind effort, but Washington closes out the game well enough for the win. AND first place in the NFC East. How about that?!
Love it!Amsterhammer said:on3m@n@rmy said:Spectacular catch for TD by Odell Beckham, NYG make valiant come from behind effort, but Washington closes out the game well enough for the win. AND first place in the NFC East. How about that?!
Anybody who predicted the Skins to top the division after week 12 would have been carted off to a padded room. We were in complete control until the last couple of minutes, which were a bit squeaky, but a thoroughly deserved win.
Missed the Cards game but the other two were great games. And Raiders & Wash get nice wins. On officiating, the worst calls seem to primarily be on passing plays, specifically rulings on completions/ incompletions, possession of the ball, and control of the ball. This includes whether or not there was a fumble. So in the next off-season they need to simplify the rules on what constitutes a completion, and maybe drop language about what constitutes a football move. I don't have suggestions at the moment for how the rules should be changed, but if it looks like a completion it should be a completion.movingtarget said:Some game Patriots and Broncos ! Seahawks and Steelers was also very good. Seattle are on the improve.Run of wins by Kansas continues. Panthers now the only undefeated team. 49ers pushed the Cardinals surprisingly and I heard that some bad calls went the way of the Cardinals also.
on3m@n@rmy said:Seattle TE Jimmy Graham lost for rest of season with torn patella tendon.
OOPS (recalling the trade for Graham).
on3m@n@rmy said:Missed the Cards game but the other two were great games. And Raiders & Wash get nice wins. On officiating, the worst calls seem to primarily be on passing plays, specifically rulings on completions/ incompletions, possession of the ball, and control of the ball. This includes whether or not there was a fumble. So in the next off-season they need to simplify the rules on what constitutes a completion, and maybe drop language about what constitutes a football move. I don't have suggestions at the moment for how the rules should be changed, but if it looks like a completion it should be a completion.movingtarget said:Some game Patriots and Broncos ! Seahawks and Steelers was also very good. Seattle are on the improve.Run of wins by Kansas continues. Panthers now the only undefeated team. 49ers pushed the Cardinals surprisingly and I heard that some bad calls went the way of the Cardinals also.
movingtarget said:Some game Patriots and Broncos ! Seahawks and Steelers was also very good. Seattle are on the improve.Run of wins by Kansas continues. Panthers now the only undefeated team. 49ers pushed the Cardinals surprisingly and I heard that some bad calls went the way of the Cardinals also.