National Football League

Page 415 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 27, 2010
5,121
884
19,680
IMO, Kaep ended his NFL chances Saturday.

His chances were almost certainly ended when he filed suit vs. the NFL. It was always going to to be very difficult to play after he had won money by arguing he wasn't allowed to play. As a sportswriter pointed out, any of the two dozen or so teams that had planned to attend (and the more than a dozen, like Denver, who backed out after the site was moved), could have invited Kaep to work out for them at any time, no money risked, no strings attached. They didn't need this workout.

I don't think the NFL arranged the workout to let teams see if Kaep's skills were still good enough for him to be a backup QB. As one sympathetic player said, why should someone with his track record have to prove anything at this point? He replaced Alex Smith, a no. 1 draft choice who while not living up to that, was until his injury considered a sold starting QB, one who probably half the teams in the NFL would have taken over their current starter. Not so long ago, Kaep was considered one of the most promising young QBs in the league, ranked behind the now-departed Luck, but ahead of the likely MVP this year, Wilson. Kaep still holds the record for most rushing yards by a QB in a postseason game, a record even Lamar Jackson is unlikely to break.

I think the workout was a test. The NFL wanted to see how well Kaep would behave, if he would do what he was told. Just throw the ball, without any distractions. And had they allowed him to film the workout independently, which sure doesn't sound like an outrageous request to me, Kaep might have fallen into line.

According to this writer, it was also an effort by the NFL to get all the fans who supported Kaep's political stance to return to the fold. Remember, despite all the flack Kaep has taken, he has a large body of support, even including from major players like Nike. The NFL doesn't want to write off all that if they can find some way to appease them. But that's probably what has happened.
 
Apr 20, 2016
778
2,745
15,680
Thanks for posting this. My initial read was from an early report saying the waiver wasn't much different than any others. Obviously that reporter wasn't reading the finer print.

I still question his approach, some decisions he made, but maybe Colin did have a point when he told the scouts that coaches and execs had nothing to fear by signing him. As I noted before, if you look at his Twitter account or anything he's said in the last two years, it's fairly tame.

Don't believe that for a second. The only contract he offered was when Colin was still on the 49ers and a trade was being discussed. Denver wanted him to take a pay cut of about $5m-$9m per year (about $12-16m, down to $7m), an astounding amount. Kaepernick was willing to take a pay cut, even flying to Denver and meeting with team management, just not that much. Denver simply wouldn't budge in negotiating, knowing the contract bordered on absurd, and Elway is in a sense trying to wash their hands of it.

One may think Elway knew SF would jettison Kaepernick and used that as leverage, but there's no way he could have known that, as it happened sometime later, after Shanahan was brought on as SF coach and ultimately made the call to cut Kaepernick.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/08/nfl-broncos-john-elway-colin-kaepernick-contract-collusion-case

Let's take a look at every Denver QB who was named a starter, since that time, and just after Manning retired:

Trevor Siemian,
Paxton Lynch,
Brock Osweiller,
Case Keenum,
Joe Flacco,
Brandon Allen.

Can anyone really say that during this period of time, Kaepernick would have been worse than all of those guys? Any of them? My honest answer is no. Flacco 2010-2012 was better (beat Colin in the SB!), but not since. Keenum had some good years, some average. I'd expect that level of quality from Kaep probably. The rest were all below average. Even if you take into consideration the two things I think make Kaep a hard QB to keep as a starter (concern about distraction/negative feedback), and his not looking well through progressions and not moving well at all in a pocket, he's still a much better QB option than most of those guys. This doesn't even consider the guys who mostly sat on the bench, but did play some, during this time:

Chad Kelly
Kevin Hogan
Garrett Grayson
Nick Stevens
Kyle Sloter
Mark Sanchez
Austin Davis
Brett Rypien

So yes, he's controversial. Yes, he'd likely be a bit of a distraction. But I'd argue less than Michael Vick was. I'd also argue while he's made some questionable decisions, ones that give me pause, he really isn't a jerk, and really isn't that hated of a player. Would fans dislike him any less than, say, Kareem Hunt? Blake Bortals? Mitch Trubisky? Jameis Winston? Jalen Ramsey? Ndamukong Suh? Vontez Burfict? Heck, there's a lot of football fans that despise Tom Brady, Kirk Cousins, even Baker Mayfield.
Yeah...I've read that link before - so I'm aware of the controversy. However, the main issue there is that Elway wasn't pursuing Kaepernick as the future QB of the Broncos, but as the backup, therefore he wasn't going to pay him starting QB money (and that is what Kaep wanted).

Remember Elway took Lynch in that year's draft (drafting up several spots to get him), so Lynch was to be the franchise QB. Secondly, Kaep started to unravel the year before. Coming off an disappointing 8-8 season in 2014, Kaep gets benched in week #8 of the 2015 season losing his starting job to Gabbert and later going on IR for a shoulder injury that required surgery in the off season. Furthermore, Tomsula is fired after an embarrassing 5-11 season and Kaep announces in Feb (2016) that he wants to be traded.

So, given that Kaep wasn't looking like the Stud QB he was his first 3 seasons and the fact that Elway was putting all his marbles with Lynch as the franchise guy, why wouldn't Elway want him to take a huge pay cut? (more along the lines of a backup QB).

So, he was offered a contract to play at Denver with the opportunity to compete for the backup job with Siemian. And if he beats out Siemian, then he becomes the starter for 2016 because of Lynch's disastrous preseason which clearly showed he wasn't anything close to being ready to play. And if doesn't beat out Siemian, he would be the backup and would end up starting anyway when Sieman got hurt mid-season. So, IMO, he blew it by letting his ego get in his way when he declined the Broncos'offer. I reiterate: His performance was declining at SF, got beat out by Gabbert, the team was losing badly, and he expressed an interest in being traded.

And it's SF that ultimately didn't want him and not Elway. Remember after declining the Broncos' offer, Kaep stays at SF with new HC Chip Kelly who plays musical QBs with him & Gabbert ending in a disastrous 2-14 season that cost Kelly his job after just one year! In comes new GM John Lynch & Shanahan, who stated that Kaep doesn't fit into their new offensive scheme and he was history.


 
Last edited:
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,577
28,180
Is there a better OG than Quentin Nelson?
After they mentioned him last night I was watching him in isolation on plays. He's pretty amazing. As a run blocker he is a human bulldozer, and in pass blocking his awareness is keen. Plus he's tough, big, strong and sturdy. He also has a reputation for being a "nasty" guy. Not dirty, but just brutal in the trenches. An OL other players don't want to cross, or get in the way of. Teams need guys like this, like it or not. Teammates feed off it, and it's a very rough sport, especially in the lines where down by down, play after play, games are really won and lost.

Good win for the Texans, but I still can't get out of my mind how badly they were beaten by the Ravens a week ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: on3m@n@rmy
Aug 13, 2011
7,886
12,048
23,180
So the NFL has no mic'd sound recording of the incident.

"Instead of sound, the NFL based its conclusion on the game official’s report, and any camera angles available, the source said. Referee Clete Blakeman was in close proximity to Garrett and Rudolph as they scuffled, and did not hear a racial slur, according to the officials’ report."

 
Dec 6, 2013
8,519
7,801
23,180
So the NFL has no mic'd sound recording of the incident.

"Instead of sound, the NFL based its conclusion on the game official’s report, and any camera angles available, the source said. Referee Clete Blakeman was in close proximity to Garrett and Rudolph as they scuffled, and did not hear a racial slur, according to the officials’ report."

Plus, no one said anything until the hearing. Wouldn't you think that Garrett would have said "that *sshat called me N!" to the guys in the locker room?
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,577
28,180
Thoughts on some games. This is the time of year when injuries, and weather start to come into play, as there's heavy rain across the entire Northeast right now that should linger, coupled with some fairly cold temps and breeze.

DEN@BUF- Denver playing fairly well, while Bills still above average, but winning. Expect a low scoring affair.
NYG@CHI - I can't figure out of Trubisky is starting or not. But I went with the home team.
PIT@CIN - Here's Cincy's chance for a win, against a rattled Steeler team.
TB@ATL - Amazing how these last 2 weeks the Falcon team everyone expected to see all year finally showed up, too late.
CAR@NO - Went with home team, though Saints could be playing better.
SEA@PHI - Seattle rolls, as Eagles struggle, despite talent. Could be wet in Philly.
DET@WAS - Stafford still out, but Washington banged up too. Rain could equalize play some.
OAK@NYJ - Rain here as well likely. Jets really banged up, Raiders playing well. Look for lots of yards from Jacobs.
JAX@TEN - Both teams on the verge of elimination. Went with home team.
DAL@NE - Pats list Brady as questionable. Right. In fact, they have about 15 players listed as that, including Edelman, Sanu, McCourty, Dorsett, Chung, Cannon. Rain should mostly be over by game time here.
GB@SF - I'm going with the Packers here. They seem ready, and the 49ers haven't been quite the steam roller they were a few weeks ago, even after getting some key players back. I expect a fairly low scoring game, 23-17 or something like that.

BAL@LAR - Ravens on a roll, my only concern is that they are peaking in November.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,152
28,180
Not too surprised by the results so far except for the Raiders getting thumped. The Detroit loss wasn't that unlikely with the way they have been playing. Cowboys and Patriots having a grind out affair so far. Browns finally have some momentum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Another frustrating Pats game. I mean they deserved the win but, its again just an absolutely mediocre team they are facing, And this is supposed to be their "difficult part of the schedule:.

The NFC East is such a weak division again. Its been the weakest NFC division this decade in general, but this year its particularly bad. The best team - Cowboys, are 6-5 and thats' inflated by having the likes of Dolphins, 3 new york games, redskins, on the schedule,

If this Pats shows up for the Playoffs, I feel Baltimore can go in there and get the win. Even ovecome a ref call or 2 (like the tripping calls against Dallas today).

But last year the Pats improved for the playoffs, so i am wary that stumbling to the *1 seed as they are ( at least on offence), once they get it, it will be too late for anyone else to change it.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,886
12,048
23,180
I'm on edge with all the Patriots games. I don't know what they need on offense in order to move the ball. Formations are good but sometimes you need talent. I still wish they got Amendola over the offseason. Chiefs game might turn into that game in 17 I believe that was close at half then Amendola got injured and stalled out in the 2nd.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
I'm on edge with all the Patriots games. I don't know what they need on offense in order to move the ball. Formations are good but sometimes you need talent. I still wish they got Amendola over the offseason. Chiefs game might turn into that game in 17 I believe that was close at half then Amendola got injured and stalled out in the 2nd.
Very similar imo to the Broncos during Mannings last run. And this could be Brady's last run.

9 out of 12 wins by 1 score or less. A few games where offense looked great (Broncos vs GB, Pats vs Steelers), but mostly pure defensive wins that went right to the end. Also got ST help at important times.

Slight difference is Pats 2019 had a few games decided a bit earlier, that appear a bit easier, whereas 2016 Broncos won 3 OT games and another one (vs Chiefs) which was going to OT but Charles fumbled on the last play of the game. But I think thats down to the 16 Brocnos having a few tougher matchups.
 
Happy with the 49ers win. They got on top early and Green Bay never looked likely. GB offense struggled to get going.
GB looked soft and got handed a real beat-down. Jimmy Garoppolo may not be great under pressure normally, but was good enough last night. For the Pack, too much pressure on Rodgers just throttled their offense. Plus a few key drops by their WRs &TEs did not help. GB seemed to have some success running, and I thought they should have leaned on that.
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,577
28,180
Very impressive win by the Niners. I was wrong on them (and GB this game for that matter. Wrong on a few other games as well). SF really looks like the team to beat at this point. Efficient, tough, plenty of skill players, solid QB, astounding D. Their upcoming schedule may answer every question we have of them it's so tough.

I don't know I'd equate Brady slipping the way Manning did, as Tom's arm is still mostly there. It seems as if their entire offense isn't in sync, isn't very refined.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,886
12,048
23,180
I don't think Hitch was stating Brady was falling off based off his previous posts like Manning but that the offense is stagnant like that Broncos team and will be carried by the defense.

I think Brady can still make most of the throws and if he had some previous offenses still put up elite numbers. The offense is just extremely out of sync on routes, timing, etc. On all levels, bad OL, running game not as good, no separation, inconsistent kicker, and drops (even worse drops when they are driving down field, or they are moving the ball and someone fumbles it away. It's no wonder he is extremely frustrated, especially when at the beginning of the year look at his receiving options to present. He could retire just off that. Against Texans could turn into how the Ravens game went.

Packers and Raiders got a shellacking. Chiefs have some breathing room for the division. It'll be crazy if Steelers make the playoffs after the beginning of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Hitch
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
I don't think Hitch was stating Brady was falling off based off his previous posts like Manning but that the offense is stagnant like that Broncos team and will be carried by the defense.

I think Brady can still make most of the throws and if he had some previous offenses still put up elite numbers. The offense is just extremely out of sync on routes, timing, etc. On all levels, bad OL, running game not as good, no separation, inconsistent kicker, and drops (even worse drops when they are driving down field, or they are moving the ball and someone fumbles it away. It's no wonder he is extremely frustrated, especially when at the beginning of the year look at his receiving options to present. He could retire just off that. Against Texans could turn into how the Ravens game went.

Packers and Raiders got a shellacking. Chiefs have some breathing room for the division. It'll be crazy if Steelers make the playoffs after the beginning of the season.
Yeah, Brady now isnt as bad as Manning then. Manning was awful. Except for 2 throws in the AFC CC
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,152
28,180
injuries are what the 49ers don't need at the moment with their schedule to come. Sanders and Kittle are back of course but they lost Kwon Alexander for the season who was in great form. Dee Ford out with a hamstring was also in good form but luckily they have depth in the defense for a change and some of the young guys have stepped up. Their secondary has also really clicked for some reason after being terrible for a few seasons. Jimmy is no Brees or Mahomes but when he shows patience and doesn't force the ball he can be good. They also have depth at RB with Mostert, Breida, Coleman and Jeff. They need Breida back from injury though. The WRs are looking better with Deebo Samuel improving and Sanders when healthy was a good pickup. But Kittle is the Swiss army knife of the offense, a very good blocker and fast for his size and they have the best fullback in the game. Not the most dynamic offense but a skillful and dangerous one . On top of that you have Shanahan's scheming as well. Been an entertaining season for Niners fans so far. Interesting that both the Patriots and Niners defenses have been great but the 49ers are the ones scoring points. Patriots offense has looked off all season. So many low scoring games for them.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,886
12,048
23,180
Absolute dominance by Ravens, maybe in the playoffs teams will have a better game plan but they're pulling ahead.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,152
28,180
Absolute dominance by Ravens, maybe in the playoffs teams will have a better game plan but they're pulling ahead.
Against a mediocre Rams team. The Buccs put 55 on the Rams who have looked a pale imitation of last year's team. The defense has slipped and Goff can't get the offense moving either. Wentz, Goff and Trubisky have all looked bad this season.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,886
12,048
23,180
Against a mediocre Rams team. The Buccs put 55 on the Rams who have looked a pale imitation of last year's team. The defense has slipped and Goff can't get the offense moving either. Wentz, Goff and Trubisky have all looked bad this season.


Any given Sunday, the Browns put 40 up on the Ravens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: movingtarget
Apr 20, 2016
778
2,745
15,680
Against a mediocre Rams team. The Buccs put 55 on the Rams who have looked a pale imitation of last year's team. The defense has slipped and Goff can't get the offense moving either. Wentz, Goff and Trubisky have all looked bad this season.
No kidding and you would expect better play from the #1 & #2 overall picks. These guys aren't making chump change and barring injury, are expected to make the playoffs every season.

And look at the mess at Oakland & Pittsburgh. The Raiders get horse whipped by the Jets 34-3 and Carr is benched in the 3rd quarter for Glennon (supposedly for a concussion). Tomlin benches Rudolph for Hodges as they barely beat the winless & pathetic Bengals. Rudolph hasn't looked very good this year throwing too many picks & too little TDs (12/9). And Tomlin hasn't named the starter yet against the big rematch with Cleveland - this should be interesting:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: movingtarget