That's not too far fetched, to be honest! I lived in Nevada for some years. I saw the same story over and over. Come to gambling mecca's, go home with just enough gas money to get back. There's a reason why casinos are hugely profitable gigantic monstrosities all lit up like they are, and it's not from getting better reviews for room stays on Yelp.
If the Raiders don't at least interview Bienemy they are fools. Of course, the Raiders have a long, long history of following up good decisions with bad ones. Over and over for 20 years now. In this case it could be the good (firing McDaniels and hiring Pierce as HC), with the bad hiring Getsy instead of Bienemy, and worse: Trading to get Fields. Getsy and Fields would cement the Raider offense to mediocrity. If the Raiders defense overperformed last year, this offense would put even more strain on that. The team could go from 8-9 to back to 6-11. Aiden O'Connell may not be the future QB for the Raiders, but his passing numbers were as good as Fields, and better the last four games of the season. Fields can run, but running QBs don't last long in this league. Only ones that develop as a passing-first QB, and even Lamar struggled when facing a top defense in KC. Despite the lure of a dual-threat QB, it's a passing league, with the ability to run effectively (the way Mahomes, Allen, Purdy do) as needed, only when that's the last option, is how QBs actually run successfully. But no one thinks of Mahomes as a running QB, let alone speaks of him as a "dual threat".