DAOTEC said:and what to think about this beauty
![]()
Kolo is Kroo, Kro is Kol, KroKol is KolKro![]()
Jancouver said:Kroon is wearing skinsuit made for Kolobnev?
DAOTEC said:
La Pandera said:I hadn't seen the back of the new Garmin kit. HMMMM. That does alter my opinion. I was giving Garmin the benefit of the doubt but now it does seem questionable. At the same time they were probably offered several designs options, felt that this particular one was the best one regardless of the obvious similarities to SKY. Also if you go to garmin.com, you would see that the colors chosen are an accurate reflection of the company's colors. Can they be helped that their primary sponsor has similar colors to SKY?
Using more red in the design wouldn't be an accurate reflection of the hierarchy of the team's sponsors. Last year with Cervelo the primary and Castelli and Rotor Rings below them, red was acceptable. The inclusion of the white back panel has to be the primary arguing point but in deciding between perceived rider comfort and offending one of your opponents I'm not surprised which route they chose.
And yes, the designer couldn't help to have known that the design was similar to SKY but since SKY's is a retro design it's not like they were breaking any new ground like the CTT kit which was in my opinion one of the more original kit designs that I've seen.
La Pandera said:I hadn't seen the back of the new Garmin kit. HMMMM. That does alter my opinion. I was giving Garmin the benefit of the doubt but now it does seem questionable. At the same time they were probably offered several designs options, felt that this particular one was the best one regardless of the obvious similarities to SKY. Also if you go to garmin.com, you would see that the colors chosen are an accurate reflection of the company's colors. Can they be helped that their primary sponsor has similar colors to SKY?
Using more red in the design wouldn't be an accurate reflection of the hierarchy of the team's sponsors. Last year with Cervelo the primary and Castelli and Rotor Rings below them, red was acceptable. The inclusion of the white back panel has to be the primary arguing point but in deciding between perceived rider comfort and offending one of your opponents I'm not surprised which route they chose.
And yes, the designer couldn't help to have known that the design was similar to SKY but since SKY's is a retro design it's not like they were breaking any new ground like the CTT kit which was in my opinion one of the more original kit designs that I've seen.
La Pandera said:I hadn't seen the back of the new Garmin kit. HMMMM. That does alter my opinion. I was giving Garmin the benefit of the doubt but now it does seem questionable. At the same time they were probably offered several designs options, felt that this particular one was the best one regardless of the obvious similarities to SKY. Also if you go to garmin.com, you would see that the colors chosen are an accurate reflection of the company's colors. Can they be helped that their primary sponsor has similar colors to SKY?
Using more red in the design wouldn't be an accurate reflection of the hierarchy of the team's sponsors. Last year with Cervelo the primary and Castelli and Rotor Rings below them, red was acceptable. The inclusion of the white back panel has to be the primary arguing point but in deciding between perceived rider comfort and offending one of your opponents I'm not surprised which route they chose.
And yes, the designer couldn't help to have known that the design was similar to SKY but since SKY's is a retro design it's not like they were breaking any new ground like the CTT kit which was in my opinion one of the more original kit designs that I've seen.
TeamSkyFans said:telling them apart in the tdu wasnt the easiest from the front, and from above combined with the fact the columbia kit is predominantly white telling them apart was a complete headache. Throw in Lay-o-pard with their white back invisible blue stripe and black shoulders and this year is going to be a headache for fans.
DB hit it right on the head. He was actually very forthright in both webchats.
taiwan said:Just overall a bit too close IMO. They weren't obliged to use the retro band or the white back (are it's benefits proven?). How about this variant(bad quality, but you get the idea)?
![]()
Michielveedeebee said:extreme looking bikenow is it just me or does it look like the Trek speed concept?
DAOTEC said:![]()
Why not wait until tomorrow morning?![]()
jaylew said:
taiwan said:I don't get why that should be uci legal. Shouldn't the seattube allow a straight line to be drawn through it?
xnobrakesx said:I know Kestrel had to ad that seat tube to their TT bike t make it legal, I think the only rule otherwise is 3:1.
Why are they using Kestrel TT bikes if Fuji is a co sponsor?
![]()
Hunter Grant said:Because Advanced Sports ( the huge conglomerate that owns both Fuji and Kestrel ) wants to make things as confusing as possible.....
As if those paint jobs weren't enough....
Oh and they also own Oval Concepts ( wheels ).
If i was a rider on that team i would feel like i've been sold out.
Hunter Grant said:Oh and they also own Oval Concepts ( wheels ).
jaylew said:Not sure if DAOTEC already posted this:
![]()
xnobrakesx said:I know Kestrel had to ad that seat tube to their TT bike t make it legal, I think the only rule otherwise is 3:1.
Why are they using Kestrel TT bikes if Fuji is a co sponsor?
![]()
L'arriviste said:Supremely hideous! Who do they employ to do this stuff? Xzibit?
TeamSkyFans said:telling them apart in the tdu wasnt the easiest from the front, and from above combined with the fact the columbia kit is predominantly white telling them apart was a complete headache. Throw in Lay-o-pard with their white back invisible blue stripe and black shoulders and this year is going to be a headache for fans.
DB hit it right on the head. He was actually very forthright in both webchats.