python said:
a couple of late thoughts on the late developments...
1. at torebear:
did you ever come across sundby's physio, like his weight and height ? it may eventually matter...i dont seem to find any. i am now convinced he's the main contender for the overall besides legkov. he'll stand his ground in the 2 remaining classic legs (his favourite) all right, but i am not sure if he can climb cermis well. the 2 times he did (2009 and 2010) he was not impressive. looking at pictures, he should be 180-182 cm and about 75-80 kg. not as big as northug but roughly the size of legkov.
2. i am irritated by randall, the athlete's rep at fis, by her political, hore-like rhetoric towards justyna's decision to withdraw. she clearly protects the authorities in stead of the athletes she supposed to.
granted, the changes to the tds programme (another skating sprint instead of a classic pursuit) were due to weather. but she talks bs here:
what process ? she herself is not at the tour and can babble freely as it has no impact on her, but she knows too well that the athletes were NOT consulted. she even said:
. the facts are on justyna's side - a heavily skewed towards skating programme was decided upon and NO athlete, including the athlete rep, was part of the decision.
i respect kikkan but when she acts likes a political hore i start recalling some of her strange blood values never acted upon.
1. Your guess is probably almost as good as mine, though I have probably seen him a few more times. I think he is smaller than Northug, but I'm not sure.
But I don't believe the power to weight ratio is that important in xc as in cycling. Reasons are:
- Less dead weight, since you use your upper body in xc.
- More anaerobic.
- The general form is important.
- The good or bad day is very important.
- Technique is important, even up alpe de cermis.
- The skies are essential.
So power to weight would only be one of those factors in my mind that determines who wins up the alpe.
For Sundby, the thing about him is that in his previous climbs he did not have a good freestyle technique. Now his freestyle technique is excellent, though probably there are still a lot of things to work on. The climb on cermis requires it's own style(skate 1 I think it's called), the question is how much he has worked on that? I don't think it's been a top priority for him, like increasing his finishing ability has.
So I guess we will just have to wait and see.
2. On Randall, I haven't heard what she said, and as always there is a question of reporting(how questions were asked, context, etc).
Also remember she is one of the two xc athlete reps, and she was not shy about organizing a revolt against the track in Falun last year. So she has not shied away from saying unpopular things in the past.
On the issue itself, I'm not sure what FIS could have done in the situation they found themselves in. The options were either cancel or have a race. Ironically had Justyna showed up, her chances might not have been as bad as she previously thought due to the course and conditions.
One can argue that FIS should have had an alternative venue available especially with Oberhof having a long history of problems. Then again why not ditch Oberhof in the first place, since they have previously showed lack of ability/will to deliver good conditions. I remember last year(or the year before), there was talk of them saving snow for the Biathlon. And this seems to be the same, so FIS should perhaps have ditched them as an organizer already.
But they didn't, and in the situation they found themselves in, this was the least worse option. I can see arguments for and against withdrawing in the case of Justyna. Perhaps this will give the impetus FIS needs to dump Oberhof, or perhaps they didn't need any impetus and Oberhof would be dumped anyway. Who knows? I think she should have stayed. But thats just my opinion.
As for Randalls 2006 blood, I'm willing to give her a huge benefit of doubt, due to all the circumstances at the time.
- It was acted upon, she was not allowed to start for 48hrs after a new test, which she passed.
- The event was at high altitude which complicates the procedure of finding the real blood values.
- We don't know how big a deviation there was.
- We don't know if somebody botched something in the test(testing standards were probably not as high then as now).
- I have grown suspicious of the man in charge at the time's understanding of how natural variability, testing methods, high altitude, etc. effect the measured blood values.
Anyway, if there was something fishy, we might find out about it since the IOC is currently in or about to begin the process of retesting the samples since the SOL is about to end.
And what was undetectable then, might light up like a christmas tree now.