- Sep 25, 2009
- 7,527
- 1
- 0
of course, the optimum way to save energy for later, as is done all the time at any olympics, would be...NOT entering a race where everyone knows you'd be lucky to get in top 10. isn't it ?Libertine Seguros said:It's a long Olympic program. No point expending more energy than you need to in the win. I presume that's the reason for some of the disappointing results like Tchekaleva ....
but then, i can see how some girls had to run, for a number of reasons including because that's what their coaching staff has ordered, perhaps to test different individual performances for a later relay selection...
so, as if i wore a coach hat, i checked the splits published on the fis site. some results are interesting..in the last stretch that included the monster hill (km 13.3 to 15) justyna and chekaleva went ski to ski, dropping only 19 seconds to the leading 4. other top 15, except wiken, were slow just on that stretch by at least 40 seconds...
also jessica diggins performed exceptionally well at the finish losing only 23 sec there..
what does it tell me ? that the top norwegian girls with kalla and saarinen, were head and shoulder above everyone in skating, and that justyna and chekaleva are 2nd echelon (keep in mind that justyna lost 7 seconds changing skis)...chekaleva should do better and better as the games warm up...
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
		
		 
		
		 
 
		 
 
		 
		
		 
 
		 
		
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter Instagram
Instagram