first and foremost Austria and Estonia after the Seefeld World Champs...
I'm very critical of Johaug and definitively thinks it was the right desicion to ban her for such a long time and I also hate her coming back to the sport. Her story sounded strange, her beahviour in the first press conference was childish and embarrasing and to me the athletes responsibility for forbidden substances is clear and there was never a question whether she deserved a ban or not.
Sundby deserved a longer ban as well instead of his two month suspension. There are rules for limiting asthma medicine for a reason and he definetively broke those rules, but his case is definitively different than Johaugs case in my eyes and less serious than an anabole steroid or blood doping like EPO as the substance is legal and that he before and after the doping case could use the same substance without problem. I know that the Norwegian use of astmathic medicine is very questionable and a definitive grey zone that many people in Norwegian sport has a big problem with. I know top Norwegian athletes (not CC skiers) that has been offered the opportunity to get a TUE for asthma medicine by doctors at Olympiatoppen because they have found some limitations in the breathing that points towards the same problems that asthmatic people have, but still being quite clearly not asthmatic.
I think asthma medicine is definitively one point where WADA should look over the rules and the process of who can get TUE. It's not only a Norwegian "problem", as
SVT wrote some years ago, around half of Swedish medals won in Cross Country skiing between 1992-2018 was won by athletes that were open about their asthma. A
finnish study shows that also in Finnish cross country skiing there is a huge propotion of asthmatic skiers.
However, no matter how much one discuss the use of asthma medicine in skiing (and in that discussion it's definitively fair to point towards Norway and the other nordic countries), I dont think that remove the correctness in pointing the finger towards other countries when it comes to the bigger and heavier doping scandals. The doping scandal in Seefeld was one thing, obvious blood doping. Austria has generally had a lot of this types of cases, Johannes Duerr, Harald Wurm, the Torino2006 case etc...
When people are pointing towards Russia one have to accept that it is a fair thing to do. In defence of Russian athletes one can point the fingers towards Norway as much as one want, it doesnt change the basic fact that the history of doping in Russian XC is much bigger and clearer than the Norwegian history. As late as in 2007-2010 there was a big wave of Russian skiers being caught for EPO/blood doping. Shiriayev, Dementiev, Tschepalova, Sidko and Nina Rysina were all caught for heavy doping violations. In the same period there were also some big cases in biathlon where Iureva tested positive for EPO both in 2007 and 2014, and Jaroshenko who was caught for EPO in 2009. So even when we completely overlook the controversy about the Sochi Olympics the number of Russian athletes caught in doping cases in this period paints a picture of a massive doping problem in Russian skiing and biathlon.
Then if one wants it one can always claim that Norwegian skiers over many decades has been avoiding being caught. We dont know what potentially has happened, and therefore one can only speculate. But that doesnt change the fact that we know about widespread Russian doping in the past, and there is no question or discussion around most of the Russian doping problem from the past.
And in the last few years a couple of half anonymous Russian skiers has been banned for minor doping violations during the international ban, for example Sergei Volkov and Artem Nikolaev who both got shorter bans by Rusada. Especially Volkovs case is similar to Sundby's case, both used a substance they were allowed to use but Sundby used too much and Volkov used a substance not allowed in competitions too close to competitions. Volkov only got 6 months, which I think would've been a fair penalty also for Sundby instead of his 2 months ban. With Nikolaev I dont know the details, but he got 1 year and not 2, so probably not a heavy violation.
When it comes to Bolshunov it's fair to threat him as an athlete that currently has no strong ties to questionable things, more than being coached by Juri Borodavko which was suspended for 2 years by the Russian Ski Federation after the doping case of his athlete Dementiev. Guilt by association is not fair, but questioning him is fair only because of his coach.
So to summarize to your comment:
I think it's right to point out that Bolshunov's not been banned or that there are no hot leads pointing towards him being a cheater - but it's wrong to defend him (or other russian skiers) by pointing the fingers to Norway and claim that they are then number 1 dopers in XC.