RownhamHill said:As I say, it stands to reason that Jens used to dope. It also stands to less reason (though not impossible) that he's doping now or in recent years. So I guess the first question is whether winning a race five years ago counts as recent.
<shrugs>
To be honest though I'm not really interested in speculating as to when Jens stopped doping. The question I'm asking is if someone (ie Obree) makes a judgement that someone else (ie Voigt) can be forgiven for past indiscretions if they think they've changed, then is that wrong?
As a thought experiment, who deserves the life time ban, a guy who gets popped too many times on low-octane drugs, or a guy who 10+ years doping but hasn't had anything the last 5? There is a lot of research about the long-term benefits of doping, even after going clean. Anecdotally, guys like Jens, Horner, 2009 Lance, Evans, Roriguez, or other guys pushing 35+ or runners like Geb, Lagat who do so well being so old, are only doing so well because they have been on the program for sooo long; it doens't matter if they're clean now. Their bodies didn't break down with time because they were rebuilt by dope. More than that, their decline is coming from such a higher peak, that their drop-off lands them right in the area of "level playing field" now.