merckx index, i think you missed my main point.
the [wada] scenarios that 'fall within the realm of possibilities' were never discounted by me.
i only compared their hypothetical probability, unknown to the public but possible for sure, to the much more sensitive to real verification entity of contador inventing the entire 'meat purchased by a friend' story.
that's my opinion on the basis of what i learned to this point. certainly, any news may change my opinion.
as regards the data/conclusions when an athlete was not tested, i'm afraid cas will take their usual stance - if not available, it's both irrelevant and inadmissible.
IOW, if contador or wada lack some data but articulate its importance, it is likely to be dismissed.
for example, if wada lacks 20, 21, 22 july blood tests, i reckon, it's to contador's advantage.
by the same token, if contador lacks sufficient number of negative clenbuterol tests pre-tdf (or a negative hair test) it's to his disadvantage.