Re: Re:
Prosecution of criminal offenses often is said to be contingent on the presence of two factors: motive and opportunity. Was/Is Pharmastrong vindictive enough to pursue such a course? And did he have the power to pull it off?
I don't think there's anyone apart his hirelings, the sycophants still wearing those yellow rubber bands, and his mum who would argue he is not vindictive to a fault (and I'm not so sure about his mum). But the question of power is much more complex.
Did Pharmstrong himself have that sort of pull with UCI/WADA/ASO? Over the period of several years, someone (probably several someones) in a position of power obviously aided him by covering up his multiple PEDs positives. With their scruples obviously thus compromised, and in light of the fact that their earlier acts never were found out (not to mention Pharmstrong's "generosity"), could they then deny his request to fiddle with the results of others? And to cast the anoraki net even wider, considering the level of fanaticism Pharmstrong inspired in the many, one could speculate whether his minions might have acted independently, on what they saw as their master's (unspoken) best interests. IOW, What Would Lance Do? Or more to the point, what would Lance have me to do, if he were here, and if we could speak in secret. It's not like it wasn't common knowledge who his nemeses were.
Would he? Could he? Did he? Almost a question that answers itself. I think it is far more likely that Pharmstrong somehow influenced (directly or otherwise) what happened to FLandis (and Contador) than it is that Lemond fired the third shot from the grassy knoll.
That's the problem with being seen a villain, innit? It always will leave the masses pondering what great evil he might have committed had he not been stopped, or what great evils he did perpetrate but that were never found out.86TDFWinner said:Can we maybe assume or toss out the possibility that maybe Wonderboy might've had something to do with Floyd being busted? Maybe a punishment or a way to screw him over?
Prosecution of criminal offenses often is said to be contingent on the presence of two factors: motive and opportunity. Was/Is Pharmastrong vindictive enough to pursue such a course? And did he have the power to pull it off?
I don't think there's anyone apart his hirelings, the sycophants still wearing those yellow rubber bands, and his mum who would argue he is not vindictive to a fault (and I'm not so sure about his mum). But the question of power is much more complex.
Did Pharmstrong himself have that sort of pull with UCI/WADA/ASO? Over the period of several years, someone (probably several someones) in a position of power obviously aided him by covering up his multiple PEDs positives. With their scruples obviously thus compromised, and in light of the fact that their earlier acts never were found out (not to mention Pharmstrong's "generosity"), could they then deny his request to fiddle with the results of others? And to cast the anoraki net even wider, considering the level of fanaticism Pharmstrong inspired in the many, one could speculate whether his minions might have acted independently, on what they saw as their master's (unspoken) best interests. IOW, What Would Lance Do? Or more to the point, what would Lance have me to do, if he were here, and if we could speak in secret. It's not like it wasn't common knowledge who his nemeses were.
Would he? Could he? Did he? Almost a question that answers itself. I think it is far more likely that Pharmstrong somehow influenced (directly or otherwise) what happened to FLandis (and Contador) than it is that Lemond fired the third shot from the grassy knoll.