- Mar 13, 2009
- 16,853
- 2
- 0
Re: Re:
Last years Tour when Nibali handled the cobbles and the Arenburg, I was willing to give Nibali the jersey and the win right there. That stage was a thing of beauty, whereas you always doubted Wiggins could make a podium in Roubaix, that stage made you think that Nibali would be certain to make a podium in Roubaix if he had the intent, and pending on the day and the tactics, he might be able to beat Cancellara and/or Boonen. Did he come second to Dekker in the u23 worlds tt?
Nibali deserved last year on that stage alone. And I dont really like him that much. And Nibali is on one of those weightloss peptides too, or cocktail of peptides and AICAR and cortisone and GW. And even leaner by about 4lbs, he still handled the crosswinds and the cobbles.
But I agree, it might be implicit in my critique of the Anglophones sans elan, sans brio. I alleged a puritan MO on PEDs. Which would be correct, but your point also correct, and I also agree, I think of them in the johhny-come-lately calumny
The Hegelian said:blackcat said:The Hegelian said:Russian, British - the point is surely that when something looks that bloody suss, it's impossible to refrain from the doping imputation. Does the imputation drop like a stone because of race, ethnicity, culture, nation-state? Surely not. Surely it's because it actually just is unbelievable.
no, the Anglophones brought a puritanical edge to their MO and pro cycling. Therefore, the backlash is worse when folks allege emperor's clothes
I see what you're saying, but I think the backlash is more aesthetic. i.e. before all the moralising logic and judgement, it just looks awful to have Murdoch-owned black jerseyed-watt fundamentalists dominating a stage race, with the main star possibly the most ungainly and ugly thing ever put on a bicycle.
Interesting that Zakarin looks so bloody awful too - he basically pedals squares.
Yet Contador, perhaps Nibali - they have beautiful form. So juiced or not, they do not offend aesthetically.
I reckon the backlash is principally this, and only then do we turn to our reasons to justify it.
Last years Tour when Nibali handled the cobbles and the Arenburg, I was willing to give Nibali the jersey and the win right there. That stage was a thing of beauty, whereas you always doubted Wiggins could make a podium in Roubaix, that stage made you think that Nibali would be certain to make a podium in Roubaix if he had the intent, and pending on the day and the tactics, he might be able to beat Cancellara and/or Boonen. Did he come second to Dekker in the u23 worlds tt?
Nibali deserved last year on that stage alone. And I dont really like him that much. And Nibali is on one of those weightloss peptides too, or cocktail of peptides and AICAR and cortisone and GW. And even leaner by about 4lbs, he still handled the crosswinds and the cobbles.
But I agree, it might be implicit in my critique of the Anglophones sans elan, sans brio. I alleged a puritan MO on PEDs. Which would be correct, but your point also correct, and I also agree, I think of them in the johhny-come-lately calumny