The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Jack Aubrey said:Regardless of Armstrong's character, any sport at the very top level is alot more than physical. Much more than plugging values in a calculator. Whatever anyone thinks of him, he is almost universally acknowledged as being one of the absolute toughest mentally. Is that worth + 10 VO2 max? Read up on psychological intensification. You can be rabidly anti-Armstrong but claiming his performance is only due to doping is ignorant.
Jack Aubrey said:OK If I got this right now: Armstrong was just an average joe triathlete/cyclist who only succeeded because he was a bully, was doped to his gills on everything under the sun, and had all the authorities covering for him. Without all that, he could only manage 50th place in the Tour de Gila.
" When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal " Nixon.LeLanternRouge said:I try to only talk about things I know about, which is why I've been a lurker for so long. I am a cycling novice, but I'd say I know a thing or two about sports psychology. The story of Lance Armstrong is fascinating from a psychological perspective even for cycling know-nothings like myself.
Armstrong strikes me as a decent tactician - when everything is going for him and he doesn't have to think too deeply about his next step - but his overall demeanour and the sum of his actions, both in the cycling world and outside of it, lead me to believe that he is in fact mentally very weak and I think that this is perhaps caused by his over-competitive nature. An obsession with victory can often lead to desperate and poor decision-making when faced with adversity, which he seems to have displayed a lot of in recent times. He seems terrified at the mere thought of losing, whether it be a bike race, a court case or his reputation. That kind of fear does not speak to mental toughness.
Fatclimber said:UCI getting impatient waiting for USADA's evidence:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-questions-usada-on-armstrong-file-delay
Maybe USADA are just being courteous and giving Pat & Hein a chance to clear their lawsuits of their plates? USADA was more than happy to grant extensions to Armstrong when needed, not the case with fatPat.
neineinei said:There is no time limit for this in the World Anti Doping Code. He should save his growling till the full heat comes on, he might need his voice for squealing when the bristle comes off. USADA haven't spent more time writing this lengthy file than UCI spent sitting on Contadors positive.
Moose McKnuckles said:Have people not figured out who this Jack Aubrey character is? This guy has been banned here like 75 times.
Fatclimber said:UCI getting impatient waiting for USADA's evidence:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-questions-usada-on-armstrong-file-delay
Maybe USADA are just being courteous and giving Pat & Hein a chance to clear their lawsuits of their plates? USADA was more than happy to grant extensions to Armstrong when needed, not the case with fatPat.
Zam_Olyas said:http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/28/armstrong-sidesteps-doping-ban-coronado-triathlon/
Armstrong sidesteps doping ban at Coronado triathlon
Zam_Olyas said:http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/28/armstrong-sidesteps-doping-ban-coronado-triathlon/
Armstrong sidesteps doping ban at Coronado triathlon
Blind fanboys capacity for self humiliation has no limitshughmoore said:Good to see Lance competing, especially when the world knows the charges against him by are a joke and there is no evidence.
USADA, think they have found the elusive smoking gun but like scared little girls, they refuse to release the evidence, maybe it will come out after the superbowl.
USADA, yes we have evidence, sorry no we dont, yes we do, no we dont, what a joke they are.
Haters hate, but hope rides again!!!
Hugh
hughmoore said:Good to see Lance competing, especially when the world knows the charges against him by are a joke and there is no evidence.
USADA, think they have found the elusive smoking gun but like scared little girls, they refuse to release the evidence, maybe it will come out after the superbowl.
USADA, yes we have evidence, sorry no we dont, yes we do, no we dont, what a joke they are.
Haters hate, but hope rides again!!!
Hugh
hughmoore said:Good to see Lance competing, especially when the world knows the charges against him by are a joke and there is no evidence.
USADA, think they have found the elusive smoking gun but like scared little girls, they refuse to release the evidence, maybe it will come out after the superbowl.
USADA, yes we have evidence, sorry no we dont, yes we do, no we dont, what a joke they are.
Haters hate, but hope rides again!!!
Hugh
THE REPORT from the United States Anti-Doping Agency explaining why it stripped Lance Armstrong of seven Tour de France titles and imposed a life ban is expected to be sent to the world governing body of cycling, the Union Cycliste International, this week.
UCI will find the report is uncomfortable reading — it details the doping conspiracy that underpinned the success of the world’s top cycling team, US Postal Service and its leader Armstrong, from 1999 to 2004.
Two riders are believed to have given affidavits that Armstrong told them he had a positive test swept under the carpet at the 2001 Tour of Switzerland and another has sworn that Armstrong told him he could use his influence with UCI to circumvent cycling’s anti-doping laws.
UCI is suing the former Sunday Times journalist Paul Kimmage for suggesting Armstrong was protected, an action that has outraged cycling fans and prompted them
thirteen said:The Sunday Times:
Report makes tough reading for cycling’s rulers
bless David Walsh!
hopefully, somebody (RR?), will have this up so I don't have to wait until Monday when my news' agent is open.