think about this
GotDropped said:
Could it be, and this is just speculation, that the UCI had total control over everything. Even allowing the doping so that they could, at whim, create a positive on whoever they wanted, thus controlling everyone, even the winners of the races (e.g. Floyd at tour 2006, Contadar, Hamilton etc. etc...).
then this
Ferminal said:
Do we actually believe the death threats are from the inner circle? Sounds more like crazy fans.
then ask yourself how unusual it is to die at the hands of a garage door?
THEN ask yourself how unusual it is when that dead rider went to the police about a doping ring and was a teammate of a high profile convicted doper?
I think a death threat needs to be taken quite seriously and with the facts we know, it is not out of the realm of possibility that high placed people might resort to such desperate measures. It is called "omerta" for a reason.
People do sometimes kill when the false world they have created for themselves is in danger of being destroyed. The fact that most people find that behaviour reprehensible and implausible does not change the fact that people do commit murder when their reality is threatened.
When USADA talks about this being more than about Lance, i tend to believe that is true and he is more of convenient hero. Who better to bring attention to the sport, a cancer survivor rises from the dead to win the TDF. Then he does it again. Can he do it 3 times? Can he tie the record of 5? Can he become the greatest winner of all time? This conspiracy had HUGE financial implications, more viewers, more sponsors, moving cycling into the mainstream, taking cycling from the sports section to the front page. An american hero goes to the largest relatively untapped resource the US and turns on the financial spigot. And everyone profits from the lie. The media, the sponsors, the sport. Show business at it's best. One of the best "hooks" in television is the returning champion. People tune in to root for them and root against them. Gameshows are frequently rigged for this. Not in the traditionally accepted sense, but once a suitable champion with a good story is found, the producers rig the game not by giving the answers or cheating like in the old days but instead by lining up inferior competition so the champ will prevail.
Cycling did the same thing by turning the riders into mere puppets and pulling all the strings with dope tests. Allowing the chosen few to dope without fear and then catching some of the lessor players to try to put forth the illusion they wanted.