thehog said:
Wow
I hope Armstrong reads that....
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
thehog said:
mewmewmew13 said:Wow
I hope Armstrong reads ....
D-Queued said:Floyd and his hypothetical Harley had no competition.
Dave.
gregod said:
washedup said:Been a while since I have been reading this forum. Trying to catch up.
Any chance someone has a link to a stream or DL of the 60 Minutes Sports intereview?!?
BillytheKid said:
mewmewmew13 said:He may mean the Travis Tygart interview from last night
DirtyWorks said:What if the Oprah interview is trying to get ahead of some damning evidence in the not-yet released, but demanded since December 2012 (maybe earlier) Wonderboy documents?
The interview may not be about trying to return to WADA sanctioned sport. The reality is, law enforcement is as politically-charged system as everything else. So, maybe it's a ploy to stay out of jail?
Benotti69 said:Maybe it is a ploy to keep the feds from restarting their investigation.
Benotti69 said:But I think it is to try and take on the mantle of Cancer Jesus again and keep LieStrong alive.
Benotti69 said:He is not going to lessen his sporting ban by going on Oprah.
Page Mill Masochist said:Yes, and it might work. In a jury of twelve, all it takes is one. Even with Lance's credibility being shot to hell, he can probably count on 1 out of 12 believing his sappy story.
Don't think this works. Lance has lost the trust of big money. The people who watch Oprah are not big money. LiveStrong can't survive on donations from Oprah watchers.
True.
Basecase said:Where's your humanity - "let him rot" ????
OK this is the Clinic and all, and Lance abused himself, but should he now be subject to a life of castigation?
Where's your humanity? Or is it truly a witch hunt?
ebandit said:very noble to consider lance........................but when did he show others
any humanity?
lance won't literally rot in limbo...............he just deserves to be accountable
for his actions + it would be better all if he showed a little remorse apologising
to those he has insulted etc
Basecase said:So eye for an eye revenge is appropriate?
How can you value / quantify such things as remorse and contrition?
Basecase said:Granted, USADA have castigated Armstrong.
He is now in limbo land.
You could say he was a product of US cycling since his late teens.
Tygart has a degree in philosophy and is a knowledgeable man.
Did / Does USADA have an obligation to show Armstrong a path to rejuvenation, granted he did reject previous plea bargaining?
Where does the buck stop with Lance's liabilities?
ebandit said:no not an eye for an eye................. justice not revenge
may i ask why? 2 trolling lance threads from yourself recently
Fortyninefourteen said:Ah yes....the blame game.
FAIL