• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

Page 119 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
thehog said:
Funny enough the documentary in its original form was a celebration of Comeback 2.0.

It was meant to chronicle the comeback to winning Tour.

It was meant to be a love in for Armstrong.

Enter stage right Floyd Landis.

So they had to change the premise which Armstrong agreed to make sure everyone knows what a nice guy he is.

I am curious to know if Armstrong is gonna make a buck or 2 from this movie.

Wouldn't surprise me if he was.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Benotti69 said:
So why did he do it?

Is this film not gonna be bad for Armstrong?

He originally did it to promote his comeback. The film was edited and then it became clear to Alex a different story needed to be told. After Oprah Alex got Lance to talk to him for a few hours because he felt he was owed it after lance lied to him for so long. Lance is not happy with the film
 
Aug 7, 2010
1,247
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
He originally did it to promote his comeback. The film was edited and then it became clear to Alex a different story needed to be told. After Oprah Alex got Lance to talk to him for a few hours because he felt he was owed it after lance lied to him for so long. Lance is not happy with the film

With the messy legal aspect of this yet to be played out, there should be at least 1 more movie, a reality TV series, and a new range of 'home use' lie detectors.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Fortyninefourteen said:
With the messy legal aspect of this yet to be played out, there should be at least 1 more movie, a reality TV series, and a new range of 'home use' lie detectors.

I hope at least one of these has Honey Boo Boo's mom in it.
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
Visit site
More from the book.

Sheryl Crow was with Lance Armstrong when he went to receive an illicit blood transfusion and later told federal investigators about what she'd seen, according to a new book about the doping conspiracy that propelled Armstrong's cycling teams.

The musician accompanied Armstrong during a trip to Belgium in Armstrong's private jet for a 2004 procedure according to "Wheelmen," a book due out next Tuesday from Wall Street Journal reporters Reed Albergotti and Vanessa O'Connell.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/i-team/new-book-claims-crow-sang-feds-armstrong-article-1.1481152?
 
"Rather than try to hide the transfusion from her, Armstrong was completely open about it," the authors write. "He trusted that Crow would have no desire to tell the press or anyone else about the team's doping program. He explained that it was simply part of the sport - that all cyclists were doing the same thing."

I wonder how Crow feels about keeping silent about this all that time. If LA is such a fraud for cheating, then people like Crow were aiding and abetting a fraud.

The role of Armstrong's closest friends and supporters in perpetuating his deceptions is one of the central themes of the new book

A theme that richly deserves to be explored, IMO. For any kind of crime or infringement of rules, we recognize that people who knew what was going on and didn’t speak out are themselves guilty. If I were Crow, I’d be deeply ashamed of myself. But people have an almost infinite ability to rationalize, and I doubt that her silence bothers her in the slightest.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
Merckx index said:
I wonder how Crow feels about keeping silent about this all that time. If LA is such a fraud for cheating, then people like Crow were aiding and abetting a fraud.

Crow lives in LalaLand as an rock star celebrity. That she talked to the Feds probably means she feels no guilt.


Merckx index said:
A theme that richly deserves to be explored, IMO. For any kind of crime or infringement of rules, we recognize that people who knew what was going on and didn’t speak out are themselves guilty. If I were Crow, I’d be deeply ashamed of myself. But people have an almost infinite ability to rationalize, and I doubt that her silence bothers her in the slightest.


There is a whole gang around Armstrong who knew, Ligget and Sherwin are 2 who need to hang their heads in shame.
 
Jun 25, 2013
1,442
0
0
Visit site
gooner said:
We shouldn't lose sense of this aspect no matter what our stance on doping is. And even though he is a *** of the highest order, it has to be applied to Armstrong as well. Sometimes perspective in our criticism is needed.

Who says it isn't a ploy on his part to seek clemency from those in authoritative positions or even from your normal cycling observers? He's certainly capable of it :rolleyes:
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
RownhamHill said:
Can someone remind me what the joke about interns was all about?

The interns at lieStrong (and a PR agency) were trolling forums and comment sections pushing the "'we like our credibility", "never tested positive" and "too much good for too many" BS.
 
Benotti69 said:
The interns at lieStrong (and a PR agency) were trolling forums and comment sections pushing the "'we like our credibility", "never tested positive" and "too much good for too many" BS.

And it became a running joke that everytime some newbie would show up fawning all over Lance, it must have have been because someone got out the whip at Liestrong or Public Strategies.

Because nobody in their right mind would sign up and make first posts that were so 'extreme' one way or the other. Due to apparent concerns over litigation, and freedom of speech, and even a (misguided) apparent desire for a 'balanced' dialog, the moderators here and elsewhere were reluctant to shut these folks down quickly. In fact, the opposite often appeared to be the case - particularly when it came to vacation invitations for those who got caught up trying to argue the BS.

The use of interns with their 'talking points' was also one of the techniques that Dopestrong employed to inflate the number of tests from 100ish to 500+, for example. Just get some dumb interns to post whatever you want, then use that information for your talking points.

While it was obvious, paid interns tended to be somewhat relentless until they were fully revealed.

Dave.
 
Benotti69 said:
The interns at lieStrong (and a PR agency) were trolling forums and comment sections pushing the "'we like our credibility", "never tested positive" and "too much good for too many" BS.

This initiative was demonstrably positive for the cause of cancer "awareness" therefore funding by Liestrong was appropriate. Just like the lobbying by Liestrong to have American legislators intervene stop USADA's investigation.

Liestrong management had a ringside seat to the scam, they have no excuse. Worse, they aided, abetted and profited.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Benotti69 said:
So why did he do it?

Is this film not gonna be bad for Armstrong?
because HE WOULD HAVE made a truckload in the intangible marketing benefit to his profile and Q Rating/Score. Nike woulda then be paying him 8figures per when you pull in the Livestrong licencing that he was getting paid, more Trek stock, more more more, it would have contributed to.

Might have even got up the 2.0 ITs Not About the Bike feature film docudrama with MAtt Damon playing the Cancer Jesus. Stapleton's Armstrong apotheosis leitmotif
 
Benotti69 said:
The interns at lieStrong (and a PR agency) were trolling forums and comment sections pushing the "'we like our credibility", "never tested positive" and "too much good for too many" BS.

D-Queued said:
And it became a running joke that everytime some newbie would show up fawning all over Lance, it must have have been because someone got out the whip at Liestrong or Public Strategies.

Because nobody in their right mind would sign up and make first posts that were so 'extreme' one way or the other. Due to apparent concerns over litigation, and freedom of speech, and even a (misguided) apparent desire for a 'balanced' dialog, the moderators here and elsewhere were reluctant to shut these folks down quickly. In fact, the opposite often appeared to be the case - particularly when it came to vacation invitations for those who got caught up trying to argue the BS.

The use of interns with their 'talking points' was also one of the techniques that Dopestrong employed to inflate the number of tests from 100ish to 500+, for example. Just get some dumb interns to post whatever you want, then use that information for your talking points.

While it was obvious, paid interns tended to be somewhat relentless until they were fully revealed.

Dave.

Ahaa, it's all coming back to me now. Thanks for clarifying.

I must say, it's a depressingly prosaic revelation - I was hoping for more hookers and blow!