Netserk said:Not that I have read anything else but the headline (Yes I Feel Like I Won Those Races) in the link, but I'd probably feel the same way if I was in his shoes. I certainly wouldn't feel like a Tour winner if I was Klöden. Or Schleck.
I agree with you, if I was in Lance's shoes I too would think I won those races. I understand what he is saying when he says "we all played by the same rules" But what Lance ignores is several things,
1. Unlike the other riders he had the benefit of Ferrari's help and Ferrari really understood when and how to use the drugs to maximize their effect which gave the doper Lance an advantage over the other dopers. I am sure Ferrari helped other cyclists but clearly LA was his premier client.
2. Lance had the money to create the best and most efficient doping program, while the others did not have nearly the efficiency or sophistication in their programs (at least from what we know publicly)
3. We know scientifically that dope physiologically affects cyclists differently. Clearly Lance responded to dope physiologically as well as any athlete ever did, whereas others may not have benefitted to the same degree.
4. Lance's team-mates were also doped to the degree they could lead him up climbs without tiring - Hincapie for example who before dope couldn't climb a ladder but after dope the sky (no pun intended) was the limit.