Jspear said:You can't rewrite history. You can try but it doesn't really work. I watched him win those Tours....it's that simple.
If Lance has so much "influence" that he can derail a criminal investigation, then why doesn't that influence derail the civil lawsuit that probably threatens him with bankruptcy?
The simplest answer is usually the best: Legal considerations drive both.
Jspear said:You can't rewrite history. You can try but it doesn't really work. I watched him win those Tours....it's that simple.
Oldman said:I watched those Tours and knew he was cheating. He never "won" them in my mind. Knew....he....was....cheating. It's that simple.
buckle said:Perhaps the only answer is to recognise LA as a 7x champion and let him return to his celebrity lifestyle. That's what the Americans want, so let them have it. At the moment he is coming across as a victim of European hypocrisy and double dealing. Let's all recognise him as the best doped rider at the Tour and move on. A career in politics would then beckon.
MarkvW said:If money is the measure of success, then I'm compelled to agree with you. If we're talking about "winning" in the sporting sense, though, Floyd is just another piece of cheating fecal matter. If we're talking about winning in the professional cycling sense, Floyd is a fucking champion!
MarkvW said:If Lance has so much "influence" that he can derail a criminal investigation, then why doesn't that influence derail the civil lawsuit that probably threatens him with bankruptcy?
The simplest answer is usually the best: Legal considerations drive both.
MarkvW said:If Lance has so much "influence" that he can derail a criminal investigation, then why doesn't that influence derail the civil lawsuit that probably threatens him with bankruptcy?
The simplest answer is usually the best: Legal considerations drive both.
That would make me very angry. Too many people get away with doing awful things, are even rewarded for it. Armstrong's devastation is so deserved it brings a smile to my face. I hope it's permanent.buckle said:Perhaps the only answer is to recognise LA as a 7x champion and let him return to his celebrity lifestyle. That's what the Americans want, so let them have it. At the moment he is coming across as a victim of European hypocrisy and double dealing. Let's all recognise him as the best doped rider at the Tour and move on. A career in politics would then beckon.
BradCantona said:Doped winners must love it when they're asked what should happen to other doped winners! Good test of the guilty conscience that one
The most effective 'dope test' in sport is the reaction of an inherited winner when a champion athlete is caught doping. The obviously human reaction is anger that you've been wrongfully cheated of your glorious moment of triumph, bitter that a chancer tried to steal what was righfully yours. Yet how often we see the Schleck reaction, exactly the opposite to that
Oldman said:I watched those Tours and knew he was cheating. He never "won" them in my mind. Knew....he....was....cheating. It's that simple.
bewildered said:He's been stripped of his tours. You can't re-write history
86TDFWinner said:I'm an American, and I don't want him anywhere near a record/history book. I want him punished, and flamed, and bashed for a very long time for what he's done to so many folks. Only his fan boys want him restored to that of Jesus like stature.
MarkvW said:If Lance has so much "influence" that he can derail a criminal investigation, then why doesn't that influence derail the civil lawsuit that probably threatens him with bankruptcy?
131313 said:You're really comparing the political capital of Lance in 2012 vs today? Umm..OK....
86TDFWinner said:I'm an American, and I don't want him anywhere near a record/history book. I want him punished, and flamed, and bashed for a very long time for what he's done to so many folks. Only his fan boys want him restored to that of Jesus like stature.
LOL on the second part. A career that definitely suits him should he go that route.![]()
131313 said:You're really comparing the political capital of Lance in 2012 vs today? Umm..OK....
Also...Psstt, he/Livestrong DOESN'T cure cancer, they're an AWARENESS foundation, they do NOTHING to cure cancer. They're similar to Scientology I guess.
buckle said:Perhaps the only answer is to recognise LA as a 7x champion and let him return to his celebrity lifestyle. That's what the Americans want, so let them have it. At the moment he is coming across as a victim of European hypocrisy and double dealing. Let's all recognise him as the best doped rider at the Tour and move on. A career in politics would then beckon.
buckle said:OK compromise - let him keep the jerseys but send him to jail on charges of fraud.
the sceptic said:Lance was the recognized winner at the time.
Berzin said:You know the answer to this, so stop with the trolling. Enough already.
As for everyone else in this and the other threads, could you control the expletives please?
TailWindHome said:That's not logical though.
We know Lance doped - he should be DQd
Surely the questions isn't we was he stripped, it's why weren't the tours reallocated
(Y'all must have done this before)
PosterBill said:Whats not logical is picking and choosing who to investigate in the last 50 years. If we are going to vacate Armstrong then lets be fair and get delgado, big mig, contador, merck, schleck. I am in favor of investigating them all rather then picking one era and I am pretty far from a fan boy
