hrotha said:
That's all good and well, Betsy, but I honestly don't see any signs of the sport changing for the better in the last ~3 years or so. Quite the contrary. Since 2011 or thereabouts, I get the feeling much of whatever previous progress had taken place has been undone.
Good point. It is a confusing time.
On a macro level many elements of the sport are better. I do not hear as many stories of NeoPros being pressured to dope by their teams. Yeah, some may babble about what Andy Schleck did almost a decade ago but today I would not expect him to get the same pressure.
Teams have backed away from having programs because of the risk. Even Levi had to hassle and pressure Johan for months before he would authorize a team program in 2007. The Armstrong case, and others, showed that riders will flip. The Omerta can be broken. Team mangers, doctors, and DS' are scared of the risk. While Froome, Horner, Quintana, have some crazy numbers we don't see the large number of crazy performances we did 10 years ago
But enough of the good news. Doping has been forced underground in the Pro portion of the sport and has flooded the amateur portion. The stories I hear these days are very disturbing. Experimental drugs, Chinese and Russian labs making anything you want, Ricco's home transfusions. Ugh. The uneven enforcement is also a huge challenge. It is hard to ignore that some countries have a much bigger problem then others.
While overall speeds are down we still have Froome on the Madone, Horner and the Angrilu, and Quintana on the Semnoz. Not normal......oh, and Rebellin won one of my favorite races today
Ultimately Frankie is giving his opinion. One he developed via 12 years as a Pro, covering multiple Tours as Media, and managing a Pro team. While I may not agree with 100% of what he says I value it more then a handful of folks on the internet swinging handbags at windmills