rick james
BANNED
Looking for the latest race results? - We got you covered right here!
rick james said:LOL, Now Betsy is the enemy
That was the one he ran way crying from, wasn't it? Really stuck the knife in, so he did...Digger said:fmk_RoI said:Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.DamianoMachiavelli said:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
So you missed the part about him being sued by Hein for calling the UCI corrupt.![]()
rick james said:LOL, Now Betsy is the enemy
fmk_RoI said:Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.DamianoMachiavelli said:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
But he hasn't moved on. He's still out there, instaquoting on the latest controversy, showing today's bad boys are just as bad as he was, page 94 of the Doper's PR Handbook - if everyone's as bad as you were then you weren't so bad. Moving on would be ... well, moving on.thehog said:fmk_RoI said:Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.DamianoMachiavelli said:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
No, he doesn’t need to anything. The fact that he moved on is enough rather than going down the “Lance is responsible for all evil in this world route” that others have taken.
fmk_RoI said:But he hasn't moved on. He's still out there, instaquoting on the latest controversy, showing today's bad boys are just as bad as he was, page 94 of the Doper's PR Handbook - if everyone's as bad as you were then you weren't so bad. Moving on would be ... well, moving on.thehog said:fmk_RoI said:Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.DamianoMachiavelli said:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
No, he doesn’t need to anything. The fact that he moved on is enough rather than going down the “Lance is responsible for all evil in this world route” that others have taken.
fmk_RoI said:That was the one he ran way crying from, wasn't it? Really stuck the knife in, so he did...Digger said:fmk_RoI said:Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.DamianoMachiavelli said:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
So you missed the part about him being sued by Hein for calling the UCI corrupt.![]()
You're the one reading it as moving on since settlement - I'm saying he has never moved on, he has always been there for an instaquote.thehog said:Hmmm, one article since settlement. Think you’ve misread the situation.
So now I've gone from being wrong to only being maybe wrong...you'll get there eventually Digger, keep on digging.Digger said:I know you like to be contrary but you’re so far wrong it’s amusing. Like your claim Floyd won’t be taxed. Considering he doesn’t know this himself that’s quire a claim.
fmk_RoI said:You're the one reading it as moving on since settlement - I'm saying he has never moved on, he has always been there for an instaquote.thehog said:Hmmm, one article since settlement. Think you’ve misread the situation.
You seem to be obsessed with this idea and what I do off this board. I'd talk to someone about it, if I were you.thehog said:But again, you should make it in to a blog post or something
BTW fmk_RoI, you're not the topic of this thread.fmk_RoI said:So now I've gone from being wrong to only being maybe wrong...you'll get there eventually D..
fmk_RoI said:You seem to be obsessed with this idea and what I do off this board. I'd talk to someone about it, if I were you.thehog said:But again, you should make it in to a blog post or something
thehog said:rick james said:LOL, Now Betsy is the enemy
No, not really. I’m not sure what she is. Her recent Facebook post around Lance was that he referred to his fiancée as his wife and this wasn’t in line with gods principles! Taking issue with his children born out of wedlock is right up their with the rightest of right wing republicans. Stirring stuff.
Oh. My. ***. God. Have you no shame?thehog said:fmk_RoI said:You seem to be obsessed with this idea and what I do off this board. I'd talk to someone about it, if I were you.thehog said:But again, you should make it in to a blog post or something
No not really. Let’s stick on topic and not veer off when you can’t respond to a post, yes?![]()
Alpe73 said:thehog said:rick james said:LOL, Now Betsy is the enemy
No, not really. I’m not sure what she is. Her recent Facebook post around Lance was that he referred to his fiancée as his wife and this wasn’t in line with gods principles! Taking issue with his children born out of wedlock is right up their with the rightest of right wing republicans. Stirring stuff.
Rancor and a supple rosary ... is another nasty cocktail ... really nasty.
In all seriousness, this is the worst thing about all of this: for too many people it is black and white, for too many people it's if you're not with us you're ag'in us.Digger said:I know she likes to think anyone who criticizes her is doing lance’s Work for him and most be trying to impress lance
thehog said:Good article on Landis, post settlement.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/lance-armstrong-floyd-landis/556868/
Take Team Sky, from Manchester, England. “Team Sky looks exactly like what we were doing—exactly,” Landis said, referring to its current dominance of the cycling world. “So they were able to do that without drugs, but we weren’t? People haven’t evolved over the last eight years.” Sky has won five of the last six Tours, but the legitimacy of its champions has come under scrutiny.
thehog said:thehog said:Good article on Landis, post settlement.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/lance-armstrong-floyd-landis/556868/
Take Team Sky, from Manchester, England. “Team Sky looks exactly like what we were doing—exactly,” Landis said, referring to its current dominance of the cycling world. “So they were able to do that without drugs, but we weren’t? People haven’t evolved over the last eight years.” Sky has won five of the last six Tours, but the legitimacy of its champions has come under scrutiny.
From the Landis article, the Sky comments are interesting. Glad he can call a spade a spade which Armstrong can’t or won’t do on Sky.
Alpe73 said:thehog said:thehog said:Good article on Landis, post settlement.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/lance-armstrong-floyd-landis/556868/
Take Team Sky, from Manchester, England. “Team Sky looks exactly like what we were doing—exactly,” Landis said, referring to its current dominance of the cycling world. “So they were able to do that without drugs, but we weren’t? People haven’t evolved over the last eight years.” Sky has won five of the last six Tours, but the legitimacy of its champions has come under scrutiny.
From the Landis article, the Sky comments are interesting. Glad he can call a spade a spade which Armstrong can’t or won’t do on Sky.
Article is a piece of romantic shyte ... Clinic has an appetite for sugared donuts. Keeps confirmation bias chubby as she goes.
No matter the rebuttals Armstrong raised, he knew that the government usually wins its false claim cases or at least negotiates a settlement in which the defendant must pay a great deal of money. According to one recent analysis of false claim cases where the government has intervened, approximately 95% lead to a favorable judgment or settlement. These realities likely played a motivating force in Armstrong’s decision to settle in spite of his rebuttals and in spite of the fact that so few qui tam defendants possess the level of resources necessary to retain a legal team of top attorneys as Armstrong had assembled.
For its part, the Justice Department also had plenty of reason to settle after six years of going after Armstrong. As explained above, the government’s case was by no means airtight, particularly in regard to proving that Armstrong harmed USPS. A de facto loss in a trial this fall would have been a setback for the federal government. After all, the government had pursued Armstrong to stress that those who do business with the federal government must fulfill the contractual obligations. Losing to Armstrong would have sent the wrong message in a high-profile trial.