Dr. Maserati said:
Hi Chris.
It is all in the USADA report, including the SCA testimony. As you could not be bothered to read it, then there is little point in me linking to it.
Hi Chris,
If SCA had been aware that LA had been doping throughout his career they would not have insured or bet against him winning any races.
OK, I went back and read her SCA deposition, along with the one from the reasoned decision. What a zoo. I was able to read the whole thing in 4 beers, so I am proud of that.
She does allude more forcefully with more detail in USADA about knowledge of LA's drug use. She does admit in SCA that she stayed quiet about PED use because of FA in cycling on pg 2113. That is completely understandable. She admits she didn't take his anger at GL as an admission of drug use by LA, FA didn't want to use Ferrari because of PEDs, blah blah. On a side note it was pretty funny reading about how the Lemonds claimed she said a bunch of stuff, and she refuted it.
So, she did allude to more than the 96 hospital incident in her SCA deposition though not like in USADA. But, like I said that is understandable and I have no issue with that. My point is that she didn't go on the warpath until Walsh, and as usual it is more of my reaction to the clinic BS than the actual facts. Tendency in here is to build up LA's enemies and gloss over legitimate criticism.
Now as I stated before you can believe that were not "friends" with LA and Kristin after 99, but I don't believe that. **** hit the fan during Walsh's research.
I am not privy to the T&C's of the contract; I have also not seen that so I have no idea if you last statement is correct. If you have a link to that I would appreciate it. I've googled it and have not found it.