Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

Page 90 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Heckler said:
I am a zero tolerance personality, But, I do feel that there is a difference between being a doper; being a team of dopers and being a team of dopers that gets a phone call to warn them of a raid or an out of competition test and collects intel on their competitors and turns them in.

I'm less offended by his doping and a lot more offended by his intimidation tactics, his dirty politics, the Livestrong whitewash.

Everyone was a doper, LA is a mob tactics criminal.

Yes, Armstrong was/is(?) a really ****ty character, criminal most likely, but he didn't force a needle into Ullrich's arm.

Really difficult to judge it on a sporting level only.
 
Aug 1, 2012
180
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
Yes, Armstrong was/is(?) a really ****ty character, criminal most likely, but he didn't force a needle into Ullrich's arm.

Really difficult to judge it on a sporting level only.

Agreed, sincerely, Ullrich was a doper. And, as some of the facts are revealed, it just starts to sculpt a view of what the sport was in reality. It's a mess.

I don't think there can or should ever be a consensus of opinion about the past.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Heckler said:
Agreed, sincerely, Ullrich was a doper. And, as some of the facts are revealed, it just starts to sculpt a view of what the sport was in reality. It's a mess.

I don't think there can or should ever be a consensus of opinion about the past.

the past is never dead. it's not even past.
faulkner
 
You guys'll love this.

Just had to replace my hard drive, so I lost all my auto-save passwords. I've (of course) forgotten every password I had, so I have to reset them all using the forgotten password links on every site.

When I did so on CN, I was asked a random question to confirm that I wasn't a bot. The question was "Has Lance Armstrong ever won the Tour de France?" I confidently replied "No." My application for a new password was rejected; instead, I was given the following response (paraphrased):

"The answer provided for the random question is incorrect."

Apparently Armstrong has won the Tour. :cool:
 
May 12, 2011
241
0
0
Heckler said:
Agreed, sincerely, Ullrich was a doper. And, as some of the facts are revealed, it just starts to sculpt a view of what the sport was in reality. It's a mess.

I don't think there can or should ever be a consensus of opinion about the past.

You can only know this. You can't know.

Personally, my opinion is that nearly everyone cheated but the numbers are so overwhelming that we'll never know the clean ones.
 
Aleajactaest said:
You can only know this. You can't know.

Personally, my opinion is that nearly everyone cheated but the numbers are so overwhelming that we'll never know the clean ones.

The clean ones are the ones who's names were not mentioned during Tour coverage because they were not racing there.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
mr. tibbs said:
You guys'll love this.

Just had to replace my hard drive, so I lost all my auto-save passwords. I've (of course) forgotten every password I had, so I have to reset them all using the forgotten password links on every site.

When I did so on CN, I was asked a random question to confirm that I wasn't a bot. The question was "Has Lance Armstrong ever won the Tour de France?" I confidently replied "No." My application for a new password was rejected; instead, I was given the following response (paraphrased):

"The answer provided for the random question is incorrect."

Apparently Armstrong has won the Tour. :cool:

CN will do anything to attract money. no better than the uci.